|
|
Post by ๐๐ณ๐ฐ๐ต๐ด๐ฌ๐บ on Dec 4, 2021 17:18:13 GMT
Yea we can time travel but can we stop time Btw , we shouldnt time travel because it might create time paradox that cause some alternative worlds we 100% dont want it to happen Time travel here, means aging slowly. This means that everything around you - stars, plants, trees, planets, humans, everything age faster/travel faster in time. So basically, you'll live your life in slow motion compared to others. This theory prevents any unnecessary complications and paradoxes like you mentioned  Once again John Marston explained it - at the point - It is possible to slow down time. Maybe it is even theoretical possible to "stand" in time imkhoa3, but: slower than standing is not possible. There is no "back" in time (slower than not mooving) - this is a liguistic trap. There is also no sidewards (left/right) or up/down in time. The "time-paradoxum" is one of the problems that results out of this mistake. You can use it, to find and explain the logical error of a "Back in time" - or as a brilliant Idea for an american movie. |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Nihilus on Dec 4, 2021 18:06:17 GMT
I think even if we could time travel that would cause some serious issues, since if you're moving back in time you'd essentially be removing your mass, and the mass of the time travelling device from the present, which would cause a catastrophic explosion
|
|
|
|
Post by ๐๐ณ๐ฐ๐ต๐ด๐ฌ๐บ on Dec 4, 2021 19:16:35 GMT
I think even if we could time travel that would cause some serious issues, since if you're moving back in time you'd essentially be removing your mass, and the mass of the time travelling device from the present, which would cause a catastrophic explosion You can use these effects, to proove mathematically! that timetravel back is a logical violation. IE: What is "flatter than flat" ?, What is a down the center ? With the help of these faslsifications you can eliminate problems that come from limitations in language. The common example: What was before the beginning of time and space at the big bang? You can spend lifetimes in brain-constructrions about this theme - not very intelligent. This is like all joke-questions: You make amusement, that someone tries with many efforts to find an answer to these questions, without understanding that the question was already the annswer. This is not gentile, but the common joke with the HillyBillys since centuries. |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Nihilus on Dec 4, 2021 19:34:53 GMT
You can use these effects, to proove mathematically! that timetravel back is a logical violation. IE: What is "flatter than flat" ?, What is a down the center ? With the help of these faslsifications you can eliminate problems that come from limitations in language. The common example: What was before the beginning of time and space at the big bang? You can spend lifetimes in brain-constructrions about this theme - not very intelligent. This is like all joke-questions: You make amusement, that someone tries with many efforts to find an answer to these questions, without understanding that the question was already the annswer. This is not gentile, but the common joke with the HillyBillys since centuries. Agreed, I think that most aspects of science "fiction" should just be studied as a hobby, and people shouldn't spend a lifetime trying to figure out something that other people didn't bother explaining. Which is what I think about Star Wars. If everything in Star Wars was explained perfectly it would not only take a really long time to solve plot holes but it would also ruin the "fantasy" aspect of it |
|
|
|
Post by ๐๐ณ๐ฐ๐ต๐ด๐ฌ๐บ on Dec 4, 2021 21:09:17 GMT
Agreed, I think that most aspects of science "fiction" should just be studied as a hobby, and people shouldn't spend a lifetime trying to figure out something that other people didn't bother explaining. Which is what I think about Star Wars. If everything in Star Wars was explained perfectly it would not only take a really long time to solve plot holes but it would also ruin the "fantasy" aspect of it You say it, Star Wars is nice Popcorn cinema with for it's time, phantasic special effects. An easy to understand plot and massive merchandizing - this is big american cinema - for the whole family. Nobody can asks seriously ask to explain the physic of Star Wars in detail. The Star Wars product and it's campaign adresses the consumer-clusters Age 6-9. For them it is reasonable and detailed enough - everything else destroys the magic. Leave the plotholes for Time-Bandits and enjoy the movie with your children. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitลก Voroลกilov on Dec 4, 2021 21:12:19 GMT
Agreed, I think that most aspects of science "fiction" should just be studied as a hobby, and people shouldn't spend a lifetime trying to figure out something that other people didn't bother explaining. Which is what I think about Star Wars. If everything in Star Wars was explained perfectly it would not only take a really long time to solve plot holes but it would also ruin the "fantasy" aspect of it You say it, Star Wars is nice Popcorn cinema with for it's time, phantasic special effects. An easy to understand plot and massive merchandizing - this is big cinema - for the whole family. Nobody can asks seriously ask to explain the physic of Star Wars in detail. The Star Wars product and it's campaign adresses the consumer-clusters Age 6-10. For them it is reasonable and detailed enough - everything else destroys the magic. Leave the plotholes and enjoy the movie with your children. What do you mean? I'm sure there are thousands of 30-year olds spending half of their time trying to figure out Star Wars physics. |
|
|
|
Post by ๐๐ณ๐ฐ๐ต๐ด๐ฌ๐บ on Dec 4, 2021 21:42:42 GMT
You say it, Star Wars is nice Popcorn cinema with for it's time, phantasic special effects. An easy to understand plot and massive merchandizing - this is big cinema - for the whole family. Nobody can asks seriously ask to explain the physic of Star Wars in detail. The Star Wars product and it's campaign adresses the consumer-clusters Age 6-10. For them it is reasonable and detailed enough - everything else destroys the magic. Leave the plotholes and enjoy the movie with your children. What do you mean? I'm sure there are thousands of 30-year olds spending half of their time trying to figure out Star Wars physics. If they like it - a hooby has not to be reasonable. Millions of people like to phantasize the what would be if's everyday. - Nobody ever will know, how the reality now would be, >> if it was a goal in minute 15. << but people like to discuss about it. Humans enjoy doing stupid things to pass with the time |
|
|
|
Post by Saltin on Dec 5, 2021 6:21:15 GMT
^ We were never the biggest on the net, Chinese forums were always way bigger. We were and are still the biggest and best outside of that though, no need to time travel for that!
|
|
|
|
Post by Manfred von Richthofen on Dec 6, 2021 0:02:18 GMT
We need the DeLorean from Back to the Future  nah just kidding. Time travel is impossible Don't you think you are travelling through time at 1second/second?  |
|
|
|
Post by ๆนๆ on Dec 6, 2021 11:05:08 GMT
Imagine time travelling only to end up you still be a student but in different times
|
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Dec 7, 2021 10:11:40 GMT
Don't you think you are travelling through time at 1second/second? Hence, you are travelling in time or time travelling. Hence Proved |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Revan_ on Dec 7, 2021 10:23:49 GMT
Hence, you are travelling in time or time travelling. Hence Proved From Your Explanation You Just Made Me Believe In Time Travel  |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Dec 7, 2021 10:27:38 GMT
Hence, you are travelling in time or time travelling. Hence Proved From Your Explanation You Just Made Me Believe In Time Travel Yep, that's what this thread is for |
|
|
|
Post by Manfred von Richthofen on Dec 8, 2021 23:49:50 GMT
John Marston From Your Explanation You Just Made Me Believe In Time Travel Yep, that's what this thread is for |
|
