|
|
Post by stoic on Feb 16, 2022 12:57:52 GMT
I don't think they have such preferences. My opinion they just don't know how to communicate with their fan base properly. If you remember we had one representative of ET here, and, no offense, the practical value of his activity was very limited. I don't know... Maybe it is a language barrier or they simply don't have PR or Support services, but they certainly should improve their attitude towards fans if they plan to grow. And the solution would be really simple: either release both versions at the same time or give some generic release date for Android. In the past weeks they've been swarmed by comments that range from a simple "when will ew7 be released?" to a batshit crazy "people will kill you if you don't release Android". No reply from et. They could have avoided all of this very easily, and yet they resorted to vague announcements that the "android version is coming soon"... Just now someone asked on fb for new conquests for ew7. They replied saying that it would take time. They chose to ignore a million comments about the Android release and answer the only one unrelated. I'm sure they don't mean to mock anyone, but this feels a bit like mockery. And it's not the first time they give this impression. True enough. If you don't know how to communicate with people, it's better not to communicate with them at all  |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Feb 16, 2022 13:02:38 GMT
Yes, obviously we have much time for reading while waiting for EW7 I recall there was a serious time gap between IOS and Android versions of WC4, but this one is even bigger. Yeah, I’m reading a lot too while waiting for IOS update Kierkegaard, which you recommended me earlier was hard to get because I’m not too familiar with Christian theology… But I enjoy reading (but not quite grasping) Postmodern philosophy  Sorry, again, that I left Discord quite abruptly, but the number of different discussions were just overwhelming there. You are on your own now Hopefully we had a good start  |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Feb 16, 2022 13:06:08 GMT
Well, I contacted the ET employee, and the Android version is coming out in two weeks. They’re super active on Discord. If anyone wants the employee’s tag, add me on discord via Govorov#8272. Correct me if I'm wrong, but two weeks means March rather than February 🤣 That makes their previous message "coming soon in February" rather misleading than clarifying. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Feb 16, 2022 13:09:16 GMT
Well, I contacted the ET employee, and the Android version is coming out in two weeks. They’re super active on Discord. If anyone wants the employee’s tag, add me on discord via Govorov#8272. Correct me if I'm wrong, but two weeks means March rather than February 🤣 That makes their previous message "coming soon in February" rather misleading than clarifying. Maybe he means within two weeks, although that obviously means nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by torvestareborn on Feb 16, 2022 13:14:47 GMT
everyone on discord is angry because they are making the premium generals iap, like otto was f2p, now he will cost money. Easytech are just scumbags because they are not transparent with fans, and they won't give any info before they make changes to the game. i already spent money buying richard but anyone who starts playing the game now, i recommend you to not spend any money. They will make f2p generals iap but we don't know the costs or the privilege bonuses you would get if you buy these generals
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Feb 16, 2022 13:21:48 GMT
everyone on discord is angry because they are making the premium generals iap, like otto was f2p, now he will cost money. Easytech are just scumbags because they are not transparent with fans, and they won't give any info before they make changes to the game. i already spent money buying richard but anyone who starts playing the game now, i recommend you to not spend any money. They will make f2p generals iap but we don't know the costs or the privilege bonuses you would get if you buy these generals I don't know, "Scumbags" is a strong word, and clearly they won't make anyone from House of Normandy back an IAP for obvious reasons. My idea is that they just needed an actual Infantry general in the IAP lineup (Olga is primarily Consul, Charlie and Arthur are Cavalry) and Otto was just the best one in the game. Anyway, at least he'll be available earlier.  |
|
|
|
Post by torvestareborn on Feb 16, 2022 13:30:25 GMT
everyone on discord is angry because they are making the premium generals iap, like otto was f2p, now he will cost money. Easytech are just scumbags because they are not transparent with fans, and they won't give any info before they make changes to the game. i already spent money buying richard but anyone who starts playing the game now, i recommend you to not spend any money. They will make f2p generals iap but we don't know the costs or the privilege bonuses you would get if you buy these generals I don't know, "Scumbags" is a strong word, and clearly they won't make anyone from House of Normandy back an IAP for obvious reasons. My idea is that they just needed an actual Infantry general in the IAP lineup (Olga is primarily Consul, Charlie and Arthur are Cavalry) and Otto was just the best one in the game. Anyway, at least he'll be available earlier.  no, that makes no sense. if they were going to make otto an iap, they would have done it in the first place. They are going to make atleast half of the remaining premium generals iap now. other than the changes to conquest, this update is just worse for the game. Easytech either know what they are doing and in that case they are scumbags or they are incompetent at communicating with the fans, look how long it's taking them to release android and not telling people when it will be released. either way this is bad for them. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleuzian on Feb 16, 2022 13:36:17 GMT
Correct me if I'm wrong, but two weeks means March rather than February 🤣 That makes their previous message "coming soon in February" rather misleading than clarifying. Maybe he means within two weeks, although that obviously means nothing. “Within” two weeks I presume - and the IOS update is coming out even later. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Feb 16, 2022 13:40:34 GMT
I don't know, "Scumbags" is a strong word, and clearly they won't make anyone from House of Normandy back an IAP for obvious reasons. My idea is that they just needed an actual Infantry general in the IAP lineup (Olga is primarily Consul, Charlie and Arthur are Cavalry) and Otto was just the best one in the game. Anyway, at least he'll be available earlier. no, that makes no sense. if they were going to make otto an iap, they would have done it in the first place. They are going to make atleast half of the remaining premium generals iap now. other than the changes to conquest, this update is just worse for the game. Easytech either know what they are doing and in that case they are scumbags or they are incompetent at communicating with the fans, look how long it's taking them to release android and not telling people when it will be released. either way this is bad for them. Sure they can decide to make Otto an IAP after a week of iOS play. Whaddaya think they did on 1914? They made 6 new IAP gens after the first few months. The idea that they are going to make half of premium gens IAP is a excellent example of the slippery slope fallacy. What evidence other than Otto that shows that? |
|
|
|
Post by torvestareborn on Feb 16, 2022 13:43:35 GMT
no, that makes no sense. if they were going to make otto an iap, they would have done it in the first place. They are going to make atleast half of the remaining premium generals iap now. other than the changes to conquest, this update is just worse for the game. Easytech either know what they are doing and in that case they are scumbags or they are incompetent at communicating with the fans, look how long it's taking them to release android and not telling people when it will be released. either way this is bad for them. Sure they can decide to make Otto an IAP after a week of iOS play. Whaddaya think they did on 1914? They made 6 new IAP gens after the first few months. The idea that they are going to make half of premium gens IAP is a excellent example of the slippery slope fallacy. What evidence other than Otto that shows that? your judgement of time is laughable, it's not been a week of ios play, it has been released for nearly a month now. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Feb 16, 2022 13:54:53 GMT
everyone on discord is angry because they are making the premium generals iap, like otto was f2p, now he will cost money. Easytech are just scumbags because they are not transparent with fans, and they won't give any info before they make changes to the game. i already spent money buying richard but anyone who starts playing the game now, i recommend you to not spend any money. They will make f2p generals iap but we don't know the costs or the privilege bonuses you would get if you buy these generals It is quite strange to call then scumbags. They are commercial company. They are not kind of a charity fund. They give You the possibility to play same game without paying. Premium means premium. Use non-premium, what's the problem? The guys paying for IAP's provided You with the possibility to play it for free. I think You simply don't understand that. Have You ever seen free entertainment which You can enjoy for quite a while and which takes significant time to prepare? I don't think so. |
|
|
|
Post by torvestareborn on Feb 16, 2022 14:02:37 GMT
everyone on discord is angry because they are making the premium generals iap, like otto was f2p, now he will cost money. Easytech are just scumbags because they are not transparent with fans, and they won't give any info before they make changes to the game. i already spent money buying richard but anyone who starts playing the game now, i recommend you to not spend any money. They will make f2p generals iap but we don't know the costs or the privilege bonuses you would get if you buy these generals It is quite strange to call then scumbags. They are commercial company. They are not kind of a charity fund. They give You the possibility to play same game without paying. Premium means premium. Use non-premium, what's the problem? The guys paying for IAP's provided You with the possibility to play it for free. I think You simply don't understand that. Have You ever seen free entertainment which You can enjoy for quite a while and which takes significant time to prepare? I don't think so. no you are the one not understanding, no one said they are a charity, and premium does not mean they cost money, alfred and belisarius are free. If they were going to make these generals iap, why not do it at the beginning with the other IAP. it was safe to assume that all the premium generals are free except the starting 6 IAPs, it's only now that they started changing free generals to IAP. consumers deserve the right to have full information before they spend money on anything, in this case we don't know which of the locked generals will be iap, and if their stats will be changed. This makes it harder to make decisions on which generals to buy with money stop trying to defend them, they know what they are doing |
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on Feb 16, 2022 14:09:05 GMT
It is quite strange to call then scumbags. They are commercial company. They are not kind of a charity fund. They give You the possibility to play same game without paying. Premium means premium. Use non-premium, what's the problem? The guys paying for IAP's provided You with the possibility to play it for free. I think You simply don't understand that. Have You ever seen free entertainment which You can enjoy for quite a while and which takes significant time to prepare? I don't think so. no you are the one not understanding, no one said they are a charity, and premium does not mean they cost money, alfred and belisarius are free. If they were going to make these generals iap, why not do it at the beginning with the other IAP. it was safe to assume that all the premium generals are free except the starting 6 IAPs, it's only now that they started changing free generals to IAP. consumers deserve the right to have full information before they spend money on anything, in this case we don't know which of the locked generals will be iap, and if their stats will be changed. This makes it harder to make decisions on which generals to buy with money stop trying to defend them, they know what they are doing Lol, I saw this style in some trash games (Joynow Studio - a Chinese game developer), at begin many good generals are free but after some updates, all of best free gens become IAPs. Never think ET become like this. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Feb 16, 2022 14:11:14 GMT
no you are the one not understanding, no one said they are a charity, and premium does not mean they cost money, alfred and belisarius are free. If they were going to make these generals iap, why not do it at the beginning with the other IAP. it was safe to assume that all the premium generals are free except the starting 6 IAPs, it's only now that they started changing free generals to IAP. consumers deserve the right to have full information before they spend money on anything, in this case we don't know which of the locked generals will be iap, and if their stats will be changed. This makes it harder to make decisions on which generals to buy with money stop trying to defend them, they know what they are doing Lol, I saw this style in some trash games (Joynow Studio - a Chinese game developer), at begin many good generals are free but after some updates, all of best free gens become IAPs. Never think ET become like this. Pardon my verbage, but ET quite frankly has never been like that, is not like that now and likely will not become like that. The only change is one general (who was locked in any case) becoming IAP. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleuzian on Feb 16, 2022 14:15:53 GMT
Lol, I saw this style in some trash games (Joynow Studio - a Chinese game developer), at begin many good generals are free but after some updates, all of best free gens become IAPs. Never think ET become like this. Pardon my verbage, but ET quite frankly has never been like that, is not like that now and likely will not become like that. The only change is one general (who was locked in any case) becoming IAP. Come on, this is deceiving the consumers of the game. Be it one general or all the generals, deceiving is deceiving. |
|
