|
|
Post by 6Johnny23 on Feb 10, 2022 23:11:12 GMT
I think Guderian's Anti-Armor is effective to armored and Tide of Iron works on everything, I guess, and also Guderian's Blitzkrieg is very for survival. Rommel is very effective in the Africa but not in the other theater, so for me it's Guderian. He is effective in every theater. But it's your opinion. Blitzkrieg is trash, if you have an HT you should put your tanker on that instead of MT. In addition, HTs want to demolish infantry, making Anti-Armor less than good(erian). Rommel's Desert Fighting is even worse than Anti Armor, but PL is worth more than literally every other skill in the game on an HT (and, by extension, a tanker), and he completely blows Guderian out of the water. As for 6Johnny23 , I do hate when people pull the air stars argument, but Monty does do quite a bit more damage to infantry, the primary enemy of HTs and something that really works well with his PL. In addition, he does have the lineup advantage, which makes perfecting 1944 a lot easier. Guderian's job is MT, not HT, and Blitzkrieg is imperative for that job. Monty only does more damage to infantry and arty, while Roko's so stellar that his tank damage makes up for the lack of it. Machinist is also a horrible skill, and should almost never be used as an argument. No MT general is insanity. Rommel's PL is trash for MTs, because of the CAT damage. MTs are also the primary tank before 1941. |
|
|
|
Post by Manfred von Richthofen on Feb 11, 2022 0:01:49 GMT
Imo Guderian, Patton and Rommel are quite equal. Differences are Skills and Damage output.
|
|
|
|
Post by JustANormalAccount on Feb 11, 2022 1:17:56 GMT
Imo Guderian, Patton and Rommel are quite equal. Differences are Skills and Damage output. Patton is obviously gonna lose so that brings down to Guderian vs Rommel |
|
