|
|
Post by theprimeminister on Mar 5, 2016 14:17:15 GMT
Now, I know this question is basic and nooby but please help me out, I just started about a week ago. How do you unlock De Gaule? Mission? Level? And how much is he?
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 5, 2016 14:19:12 GMT
HQ level. He is 1010 and not very strong.
|
|
|
|
Post by theprimeminister on Mar 5, 2016 14:25:29 GMT
Thanks. I guess I should stay away then. Early missions make him look powerful
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 5, 2016 17:14:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Mar 10, 2016 19:52:48 GMT
I feel sad for De Gaulle, I mean he was a nice leader and all while beating the germans unlike others (For a while) during fall gelb created by the legendary Erich von Manstein, so I do feel Gaulle was neglected by easytech |
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Mar 11, 2016 1:33:12 GMT
Yeah they did that just so people can waste money on a famous general.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Mar 11, 2016 3:23:07 GMT
Easytech did the same to half of the German Academy
|
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Mar 11, 2016 12:22:33 GMT
Yeah lots of generals Easytech makes them suck way more then what they actually were.
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Mar 11, 2016 14:49:54 GMT
i think montgomery is overrated. he had way more tanks and technologie and air support than rommel had. Still he failed several times
|
|
|
|
Post by Horatio Nelson on Mar 11, 2016 16:55:02 GMT
i think montgomery is overrated. he had way more tanks and technologie and air support than rommel had. Still he failed several times I agree, he's only well known for being Rommel's "adversary in the desert". He should have more humble stats in WC3. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Mar 11, 2016 17:03:46 GMT
Overrated generals eh? anyone heard Eisenhower? Best example of overrated
|
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Mar 11, 2016 18:07:08 GMT
Well, I guess make general stat based on who they are remembered. Famous generals are strong in WC3 while others who were remembered as 'loser' received underrated stat. Well, for making a game, you need some good and bad generals.
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 12, 2016 4:00:03 GMT
Overrated generals eh? anyone heard Eisenhower? Best example of overrated He was a five-star general in the United States Army during World War II and served as Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in Europe. He was responsible for planning and supervising the invasion of North Africa in Operation Torch in 1942–43 and the successful invasion of France and Germany in 1944–45 from the Western Front. In 1951, he became the first Supreme Commander of NATO. Wiki disagrees with you. Eisenhower was also a President of... the greatest country in the world! |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Mar 12, 2016 5:36:53 GMT
Overrated generals eh? anyone heard Eisenhower? Best example of overrated He was a five-star general in the United States Army during World War II and served as Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in Europe. He was responsible for planning and supervising the invasion of North Africa in Operation Torch in 1942–43 and the successful invasion of France and Germany in 1944–45 from the Western Front. In 1951, he became the first Supreme Commander of NATO. Wiki disagrees with you. Eisenhower was also a President of... the greatest country in the world! I know that....but isn't his stars too much? |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 12, 2016 5:51:46 GMT
Hmm idk... because even with all of those stars, Manstein and Zhukov both are still considered better than Eisenhower. If anything, at least Eisenhower is a flexible general with stronger stars in weaker areas (such as navy). That's somewhat making up the difference. I'm not saying that Easytech made WC3 balanced as a game, but at least it's sorta a decent way to set that up with 3 different choices for purchasing a marshal.
Back to Eisenhower and his stats
I would say Eisenhower is legitimately a very good general in real life, especially coordinating vastly complicated operations with multi-national forces, dealing with logistics.
|
|
