|
|
Post by generalmalaise on Jul 9, 2022 5:00:46 GMT
I’ve been playing this series since 2-3. I’ve heard a lot of people think the conquests are too easy and the Ai is weak but I think this is the most realistic version I’ve seen. You can steamroll any conquest ( easy to win but time consuming to dominate) but it always has sneaky armies in the rear to distract you.
This is more accurate to how a person would play when losing, just annoy the opponent as much as possible for fun. It’s like a person that doesn’t tire out and leave . Very annoying .
The conquests are pretty easy with proper preparation it’s easy to win but the computer just hangs on ( on the other hand is also makes stupid decisions like leaving a defended city without troops to attack a juicy target, but giving up ground is a valid strategy It just works better without countries having a stable economy)
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by awsome4444 on Jul 9, 2022 21:56:24 GMT
I’ve been playing this series since 2-3. I’ve heard a lot of people think the conquests are too easy and the Ai is weak but I think this is the most realistic version I’ve seen. You can steamroll any conquest ( easy to win but time consuming to dominate) but it always has sneaky armies in the rear to distract you. This is more accurate to how a person would play when losing, just annoy the opponent as much as possible for fun. It’s like a person that doesn’t tire out and leave . Very annoying . The conquests are pretty easy with proper preparation it’s easy to win but the computer just hangs on ( on the other hand is also makes stupid decisions like leaving a defended city without troops to attack a juicy target, but giving up ground is a valid strategy It just works better without countries having a stable economy) Thoughts? I mean AI in ET games are pretty bad in general. However, it to counteract this the game buffs their troops and income immensely to counteract the player and their troops. Although I agree that the game does a better job at moderating diffculty compared to hard games like Wc4 and Ew4. Although much enjoyable for new players, this game may not be as engaging for veteran players as most can clear one or two chapters within a single day. Therefore, I believe that the game should be have hard mode conquest and hell mode campaign designed for veteran players for enjoyment and greater rewards. |
|
|
|
Post by generalmalaise on Jul 10, 2022 4:00:53 GMT
I’ve been playing this series since 2-3. I’ve heard a lot of people think the conquests are too easy and the Ai is weak but I think this is the most realistic version I’ve seen. You can steamroll any conquest ( easy to win but time consuming to dominate) but it always has sneaky armies in the rear to distract you. This is more accurate to how a person would play when losing, just annoy the opponent as much as possible for fun. It’s like a person that doesn’t tire out and leave . Very annoying . The conquests are pretty easy with proper preparation it’s easy to win but the computer just hangs on ( on the other hand is also makes stupid decisions like leaving a defended city without troops to attack a juicy target, but giving up ground is a valid strategy It just works better without countries having a stable economy) Thoughts? I mean AI in ET games are pretty bad in general. However, it to counteract this the game buffs their troops and income immensely to counteract the player and their troops. Although I agree that the game does a better job at moderating diffculty compared to hard games like Wc4 and Ew4. Although much enjoyable for new players, this game may not be as engaging for veteran players as most can clear one or two chapters within a single day. Therefore, I believe that the game should be have hard mode conquest and hell mode campaign designed for veteran players for enjoyment and greater rewards. I know what you mean. Personally I’m expecting a different experience on a mobile game so before I respond I have to ask….how would you design hard and hell mode for conquest? I’m picking up what you are putting down. I’ve played every easy tech game on free mode except for world conquerer 4 |
|
|
|
Post by awsome4444 on Jul 10, 2022 13:11:08 GMT
I mean AI in ET games are pretty bad in general. However, it to counteract this the game buffs their troops and income immensely to counteract the player and their troops. Although I agree that the game does a better job at moderating diffculty compared to hard games like Wc4 and Ew4. Although much enjoyable for new players, this game may not be as engaging for veteran players as most can clear one or two chapters within a single day. Therefore, I believe that the game should be have hard mode conquest and hell mode campaign designed for veteran players for enjoyment and greater rewards. I know what you mean. Personally I’m expecting a different experience on a mobile game so before I respond I have to ask….how would you design hard and hell mode for conquest? I’m picking up what you are putting down. I’ve played every easy tech game on free mode except for world conquerer 4 Higher unit levels, limited amount of generals deployed, stronger enemy economy, and overpowered enemy gens like in Wc4. |
|
