|
|
Post by yuanzhong on Sept 3, 2022 14:12:32 GMT
The game has an excellent potential indeed. Still many conquests to play... I hope they find solution how to extend campaigns too. European... uhm, and Friends War 7 😄 P/s: I hope ET will extend the PoH conquest (especially pts), that's the only reason I do conquest (I did only 1 conquest in Crusader Era for purple item 🤣, all other untouched). |
|
|
|
Post by playeruser37 on Sept 3, 2022 15:11:01 GMT
The game has an excellent potential indeed. Still many conquests to play... I hope they find solution how to extend campaigns too. . Maybe they will add new campaign . |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Sept 3, 2022 15:50:10 GMT
They are planning a discord event for Simeon, Basil II, Martel and Hardrada’s legends.
|
|
|
|
Post by nikomachos on Sept 3, 2022 16:17:09 GMT
that is great. we will have to see the new conquest features all in action and i am very excited.
also, halt unit production is what all autobattles need to ensure recruitment in the frontlines, nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 3, 2022 20:05:57 GMT
The game has an excellent potential indeed. Still many conquests to play... I hope they find solution how to extend campaigns too. . Maybe they will add new campaign . I mean campaign or two are nice, but they have to find out how to make endgame players busy. In EW5 you may play for half a year or even a year and you still can find a challenging content for your team. I would like actually to think over how to beat this or that mission. That was the case in EW5 and GoG Classic and Pacific. Even if you have best generals in the game you may fail if your strategy isn't good enough. I don't want just to deploy my best generals and literally smash everything around. There is also another way to increase the overall difficulty of the game. In EW6 1914 there were challenge conquests. It was really fun to play for such countries as Belgium or Serbia. I understand that the difficulty is probably not what most players seek  but I personally would like to see it. Victory is sweet only if difficulties are to overcome |
|
|
|
Post by hrabrimalitoster on Sept 3, 2022 20:43:31 GMT
. Maybe they will add new campaign . I mean campaign or two are nice, but they have to find out how to make endgame players busy. In EW5 you may play for half a year or even a year and you still can find a challenging content for your team. I would like actually to think over how to beat this or that mission. That was the case in EW5 and GoG Classic and Pacific. Even if you have best generals in the game you may fail if your strategy isn't good enough. I don't want just to deploy my best generals and literally smash everything around. There is also another way to increase the overall difficulty of the game. In EW6 1914 there were challenge conquests. It was really fun to play for such countries as Belgium or Serbia. I understand that the difficulty is probably not what most players seek but I personally would like to see it. Victory is sweet only if difficulties are to overcome The hardest for me was the Crimean War in EW6 1804 (to get 3 stars). I remember some mission where in order to get 3 stars you must not deploy a Cav General. I played it before there was no Med Pack in the game and only 8 or 10 slots for Generals and it was really challenging. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 4, 2022 1:51:03 GMT
I mean campaign or two are nice, but they have to find out how to make endgame players busy. In EW5 you may play for half a year or even a year and you still can find a challenging content for your team. I would like actually to think over how to beat this or that mission. That was the case in EW5 and GoG Classic and Pacific. Even if you have best generals in the game you may fail if your strategy isn't good enough. I don't want just to deploy my best generals and literally smash everything around. There is also another way to increase the overall difficulty of the game. In EW6 1914 there were challenge conquests. It was really fun to play for such countries as Belgium or Serbia. I understand that the difficulty is probably not what most players seek but I personally would like to see it. Victory is sweet only if difficulties are to overcome The hardest for me was the Crimean War in EW6 1804 (to get 3 stars). I remember some mission where in order to get 3 stars you must not deploy a Cav General. I played it before there was no Med Pack in the game and only 8 or 10 slots for Generals and it was really challenging. Yes, Crimean war was challenging too, but to some extent it was an artificial difficulty (the same is true for some EW6 1914 missions). To play a mission without particular type of generals or without generals at all was a bizarre winning condition, something like to play chess without a Rock or a Queen. It is challenging indeed but it was a winning condition not a mission itself that made it really challenging. In EW5 in comparison you may deploy your best generals and still struggle to win. I think that is more logical. You purchase a general, try to upgrade him and to improve his battle power and then he is your best tool to achieve success. It is somewhat a lame attempt to increase a difficulty when they allow players to have powerful generals but ban them for certain missions. |
|
|
|
Post by playeruser37 on Sept 5, 2022 10:57:10 GMT
=European War 7 Preview Time= Sir William Wallace will join the battlefield of European War 7 in the next update. With many other new contents and adjustments, we expect the 1.8 version will be released anytime in late September.  |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 5, 2022 11:38:42 GMT
I see they decided to give one of the weakest unit to him anyway... Quite strange if they are planning to sell him.
And "anytime in late September" doesn't sound encouraging either. I think they should, at the very least, refresh "daily" login rewards and unlock all available units in recruiting pool. Otherwise it is a great waiting time for those who like Territory battles and Expeditions. That means for no-one, actually, if you missed my irony 😀
|
|
|
|
Post by zabadanov86 on Sept 5, 2022 11:56:36 GMT
Or je will be cheapest general or his skills and privilege will be on fire 😊
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Sept 5, 2022 12:58:07 GMT
I see they decided to give one of the weakest unit to him anyway... Quite strange if they are planning to sell him. And "anytime in late September" doesn't sound encouraging either. I think they should, at the very least, refresh "daily" login rewards and unlock all available units in recruiting pool. Otherwise it is a great waiting time for those who like Territory battles and Expeditions. That means for no-one, actually, if you missed my irony 😀 Weakest unit?! Also, It is more than likely that he will be the cheap version of Su Dingfand, like Arthur is the cheap version of Charlie, or Olga is the cheap version of Otto. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 5, 2022 13:17:09 GMT
I see they decided to give one of the weakest unit to him anyway... Quite strange if they are planning to sell him. And "anytime in late September" doesn't sound encouraging either. I think they should, at the very least, refresh "daily" login rewards and unlock all available units in recruiting pool. Otherwise it is a great waiting time for those who like Territory battles and Expeditions. That means for no-one, actually, if you missed my irony 😀 Weakest unit?! Also, It is more than likely that he will be the cheap version of Su Dingfand, like Arthur is the cheap version of Charlie, or Olga is the cheap version of Otto. Well, perhaps, it is possible to use another, less offensive, term for T2 unit, but I don't know many terms for weak T2 units Besides, do I understand it correctly, that he will be the cheap version of a general with almost (and I demonstrate my tolerance by using "almost" ) useless privileges and who is basically good for hard PvP battles that are easily avoidable or winnable by other means? And do they try to convince players to pay for this "cheap version"? Unless his active skill is somewhat "to smash three quarters of health of every enemy within sight" I predict that only andrei and descendants of Wallace in Northern Scotland will purchase him. I am not sure about descendants of Wallace though maybe they skip it too |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Sept 5, 2022 13:58:27 GMT
Weakest unit?! Also, It is more than likely that he will be the cheap version of Su Dingfand, like Arthur is the cheap version of Charlie, or Olga is the cheap version of Otto. Well, perhaps, it is possible to use another, less offensive, term for T2 unit, but I don't know many terms for weak T2 units Besides, do I understand it correctly, that he will be the cheap version of a general with almost (and I demonstrate my tolerance by using "almost" ) useless privileges and who is basically good for hard PvP battles that are easily avoidable or winnable by other means? And do they try to convince players to pay for this "cheap version"? Unless his active skill is somewhat "to smash three quarters of health of every enemy within sight" I predict that only andrei and descendants of Wallace in Northern Scotland will purchase him. I am not sure about descendants of Wallace though maybe they skip it too Hey, $3 for a strong Counter Infantry is better than $7 for an amazing Counter Infantry. I would probably buy him depending on his 2 unknown skills if I redownload the game. |
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on Sept 5, 2022 15:00:26 GMT
Weakest unit?! Also, It is more than likely that he will be the cheap version of Su Dingfand, like Arthur is the cheap version of Charlie, or Olga is the cheap version of Otto. Well, perhaps, it is possible to use another, less offensive, term for T2 unit, but I don't know many terms for weak T2 units Besides, do I understand it correctly, that he will be the cheap version of a general with almost (and I demonstrate my tolerance by using "almost" ) useless privileges and who is basically good for hard PvP battles that are easily avoidable or winnable by other means? And do they try to convince players to pay for this "cheap version"? Unless his active skill is somewhat "to smash three quarters of health of every enemy within sight" I predict that only andrei and descendants of Wallace in Northern Scotland will purchase him. I am not sure about descendants of Wallace though maybe they skip it too You missed me . I also buy him for sure |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 5, 2022 15:59:09 GMT
Well, perhaps, it is possible to use another, less offensive, term for T2 unit, but I don't know many terms for weak T2 units Besides, do I understand it correctly, that he will be the cheap version of a general with almost (and I demonstrate my tolerance by using "almost" ) useless privileges and who is basically good for hard PvP battles that are easily avoidable or winnable by other means? And do they try to convince players to pay for this "cheap version"? Unless his active skill is somewhat "to smash three quarters of health of every enemy within sight" I predict that only andrei and descendants of Wallace in Northern Scotland will purchase him. I am not sure about descendants of Wallace though maybe they skip it too You missed me . I also buy him for sure I know, but I wanted to emphasize my point yuanzhong, andrei, descendants of Wallace and Gerdy... Too many buyers already I have lost an argument 🙃 |
|
but I personally would like to see it. Victory is sweet only if difficulties are to overcome 
