|
|
Post by jimtgaming on Jul 24, 2022 3:02:41 GMT
Do yall feel that this game is rather underdeveloped
Wld love to see new features, generals, and DEFINITELY new conquest + army group + (maybe) campaign scenarios
Just have the feeling that et has given up on this game; after all their hype for it on their social media platforms only lasted for a month or two after release (for GCR came out subsequently)
|
|
|
|
Post by Zaxer Unixan on Oct 23, 2022 3:33:02 GMT
A map editor or a sandbox mode  Allows you to make your own WW2 scenarios (place terrain, place AI units including yours, equip with Special Forces, set level of every unit, place generals on any unit, set scripted rain/snow event, set AI units to attack/defend) and even create other real conflicts/battles in WW2 that aren't playable/present in the game itself like Operation Dragoon, and including fictional missions like the Antarctic campaign. You can upload your scenarios online so that other players can try and beat them (and provide a rating). It would be an interesting and exciting feature. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Oct 24, 2022 14:00:46 GMT
A map editor or a sandbox mode Allows you to make your own WW2 scenarios (place terrain, place AI units including yours, equip with Special Forces, set level of every unit, place generals on any unit, set scripted rain/snow event, set AI units to attack/defend) and even create other real conflicts/battles in WW2 that aren't playable/present in the game itself like Operation Dragoon, and including fictional missions like the Antarctic campaign. You can upload your scenarios online so that other players can try and beat them (and provide a rating). It would be an interesting and exciting feature. They insist that they will not do it, because that could give them... pretty hefty fining due to Chinese Law, so unless Chinese Law changes in the near future, I think we can discount that. |
|
|
|
Post by Theron of Acragas on Oct 25, 2022 8:37:07 GMT
A map editor or a sandbox mode Allows you to make your own WW2 scenarios (place terrain, place AI units including yours, equip with Special Forces, set level of every unit, place generals on any unit, set scripted rain/snow event, set AI units to attack/defend) and even create other real conflicts/battles in WW2 that aren't playable/present in the game itself like Operation Dragoon, and including fictional missions like the Antarctic campaign. You can upload your scenarios online so that other players can try and beat them (and provide a rating). It would be an interesting and exciting feature. They insist that they will not do it, because that could give them... pretty hefty fining due to Chinese Law, so unless Chinese Law changes in the near future, I think we can discount that. Now I'm curious what law exactly this violates and why. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Oct 25, 2022 12:49:24 GMT
They insist that they will not do it, because that could give them... pretty hefty fining due to Chinese Law, so unless Chinese Law changes in the near future, I think we can discount that. Now I'm curious what law exactly this violates and why. I don't know, but that's why they say they won't do it. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Oct 26, 2022 15:36:06 GMT
It is rather strange that they continue to update EW5 but entirely stopped their work on EW6 1914 and GoG3. These two games have a lot of potential, imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimtgaming on Oct 28, 2022 16:31:24 GMT
It is rather strange that they continue to update EW5 but entirely stopped their work on EW6 1914 and GoG3. These two games have a lot of potential, imo. updating wc3 (which is what they are focusing on now) helps revive nostalgia but its a significantly smaller player base than wc4 ew6 1914 and gog3 which have been imo their signature games in the past few years (not to mention their most popular ones) like ig im not too hyped abt wc4 updates cuz game mechanics arent the best, but leaving (esp) gog3 and ew6:1914 untouched when they could be so much more? sadly a waste |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Oct 28, 2022 17:31:19 GMT
It is rather strange that they continue to update EW5 but entirely stopped their work on EW6 1914 and GoG3. These two games have a lot of potential, imo. updating wc3 (which is what they are focusing on now) helps revive nostalgia but its a significantly smaller player base than wc4 ew6 1914 and gog3 which have been imo their signature games in the past few years (not to mention their most popular ones) like ig im not too hyped abt wc4 updates cuz game mechanics arent the best, but leaving (esp) gog3 and ew6:1914 untouched when they could be so much more? sadly a waste I think it is a question of priorities. My suspicion EW7 is the most profitable game they ever made. So, I can understand why it is their top priority at the moment. On the other hand, their other updates and decisions are beyond my comprehension. I personally like EW5 and I am glad they continue to work on it. But "why"? I simply don't have an answer. Only a handful of hard-core players ever completed it or continue to play. I agree that both GoG3 and EW6 1914 have an excellent potential for further development. And definitely both of them have/had a broader fan base than EW5. This new GoG update makes me speechless, in fact. No new content and 4 new IAP generals. Who on earth will buy them? Majority of players (p2w or f2p) completed the game months ago. What is the purpose of new generals or badges? No answers whatsoever... |
|
|
|
Post by jimtgaming on Oct 30, 2022 0:58:32 GMT
same thing applies to wc3? and yea the updates were really perfunctory
|
|
|
|
Post by tecnoghost on Oct 30, 2022 3:46:28 GMT
It may be that they just don't have much faith in GOG 3 and are just testing in a silly way if it's worth developing something decent for that game, I don't think they have much love for that game either, I mean WC has decent updates although some of the new generals are a bit bad, in any case I say that if they wanted to put only new IAPs, they should make the medals farmable in the conquest, I say now the daily rewards bring fewer medals and those that were obtained in the conquest for technology and specials now they are only obtained once per faction so they reduced the farming to finish off the joke, also to compensate a little the IAP they could have put the upgradeable general of GOG 1 as free, I say for stars use normal medals, and for skills force medals specials, I say it is not a mechanic that looks bad if you make the change of farming, and it is still a weak solution but more acceptable than this
|
|
|
|
Post by jimtgaming on Oct 30, 2022 8:30:06 GMT
It may be that they just don't have much faith in GOG 3 and are just testing in a silly way if it's worth developing something decent for that game, I don't think they have much love for that game either, I mean WC has decent updates although some of the new generals are a bit bad, in any case I say that if they wanted to put only new IAPs, they should make the medals farmable in the conquest, I say now the daily rewards bring fewer medals and those that were obtained in the conquest for technology and specials now they are only obtained once per faction so they reduced the farming to finish off the joke, also to compensate a little the IAP they could have put the upgradeable general of GOG 1 as free, I say for stars use normal medals, and for skills force medals specials, I say it is not a mechanic that looks bad if you make the change of farming, and it is still a weak solution but more acceptable than this then ironically enough the game they do not have much love for is one of their most successful and promising ones to date  investing in wc3 instead of wc4 seems to target the older player generation with many fond memories, but the fact still stands that wc4 is still their flagship, albeit an ailing one |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Oct 30, 2022 12:56:15 GMT
It may be that they just don't have much faith in GOG 3 and are just testing in a silly way if it's worth developing something decent for that game, I don't think they have much love for that game either, I mean WC has decent updates although some of the new generals are a bit bad, in any case I say that if they wanted to put only new IAPs, they should make the medals farmable in the conquest, I say now the daily rewards bring fewer medals and those that were obtained in the conquest for technology and specials now they are only obtained once per faction so they reduced the farming to finish off the joke, also to compensate a little the IAP they could have put the upgradeable general of GOG 1 as free, I say for stars use normal medals, and for skills force medals specials, I say it is not a mechanic that looks bad if you make the change of farming, and it is still a weak solution but more acceptable than this then ironically enough the game they do not have much love for is one of their most successful and promising ones to date investing in wc3 instead of wc4 seems to target the older player generation with many fond memories, but the fact still stands that wc4 is still their flagship, albeit an ailing one WC3 was a very popular game, but, in my opinion, it is rather boring in comparison to other ET games. WC4 was an improvement but I haven't ever any desire to replay WC4 after completing it. As Frederick the Great said once: "he who tries to defend everything - defends nothing". I have nothing against futuristic conflicts but to fight against aliens on Tanks - it is "too much" to my taste. |
|
|
|
Post by jimtgaming on Oct 31, 2022 11:08:47 GMT
yea i rarely replay wc4 cuz the mechanics are boring too, even though it was my best game with a lot of fond memories and achievements
|
|
|
|
Post by gladiator on Nov 30, 2022 23:15:58 GMT
Do yall feel that this game is rather underdeveloped Wld love to see new features, generals, and DEFINITELY new conquest + army group + (maybe) campaign scenarios Just have the feeling that et has given up on this game; after all their hype for it on their social media platforms only lasted for a month or two after release (for GCR came out subsequently) I agree. I'd suggest: 1.Eastern front 1944. 10 Stalin hits (beside ones of 1941 campaign) + Prussian operation + Budapest siege + Viena siege + liberation of Yugoslavia and Greece. 2.Kuril Islands and Sakhalin operations for Pacific 1945. 3.Middle east battle (French Levant-Iraq-Iran) for Northern Africa 1941. 4.Elite battles: Budapest, Koenigsberg, Bagration. 5.New features: landmines, fuel (gonna be hardcore), limitation of population in conquest (I'd advice to look at the experience of Strategy and Tactics game in this case). |
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Dec 1, 2022 14:33:51 GMT
Do yall feel that this game is rather underdeveloped Wld love to see new features, generals, and DEFINITELY new conquest + army group + (maybe) campaign scenarios Just have the feeling that et has given up on this game; after all their hype for it on their social media platforms only lasted for a month or two after release (for GCR came out subsequently) I agree. I'd suggest: 1.Eastern front 1944. 10 Stalin hits (beside ones of 1941 campaign) + Prussian operation + Budapest siege + Viena siege + liberation of Yugoslavia and Greece. 2.Kuril Islands and Sakhalin operations for Pacific 1945. 3.Middle east battle (French Levant-Iraq-Iran) for Northern Africa 1941. 4.Elite battles: Budapest, Koenigsberg, Bagration. 5.New features: landmines, fuel (gonna be hardcore), limitation of population in conquest (I'd advice to look at the experience of Strategy and Tactics game in this case). 1. Man, how long have you played the game for? Eastern Front 1944 is integrated into 1944 Western Front! 2. These campaigns are minor 3. Sure 4. Sure 5. Why? Why change core mechanics when they work just fine? |
|
