|
|
Post by Neltrase Vectore on Mar 12, 2016 12:59:12 GMT
Working on my way with Thailand 1939. Since Thailand always get toasted at early game before they even join the war, so I give Thailand a go  . And ........  |
|
|
|
Post by A newb on Mar 12, 2016 13:46:40 GMT
Brisbane is almost always the reason why I don't manage to finish a conquest in less than 65 turns =/
Ps: Can what 1-start country is great for 65 turns or less in 1939? (Preferably allies)
|
|
|
|
Post by Horatio Nelson on Mar 12, 2016 14:09:41 GMT
Working on my way with Thailand 1939. Since Thailand always get toasted at early game before they even join the war, so I give Thailand a go . And ........ Welcome to hell, aka Brisbane. |
|
|
|
Post by TK421 on Mar 12, 2016 16:33:51 GMT
Actually, I had no problems with Australia XD Africa was the real issue, especially with Egypt:P
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 12, 2016 19:27:20 GMT
Brisbane is almost always the reason why I don't manage to finish a conquest in less than 65 turns =/ Ps: Can what 1-start country is great for 65 turns or less in 1939? (Preferably allies) 1939 is more friendly to Axis even with the infamous Brisbane. I suggest Hungary 1939 as 1 star just for the medals (and not to mention 2k industry given as well). I don't really understand why you wanted to finish under 65 turns with a single star country. Once you've achieved it with a 3 star (Japan for Axis, Russia for allies - good recommendations), you got all of the wonders given for the under 65 turn thing. It doesn't matter if you achieved it again, because the wonders are already awarded to you. The resources like Industry, Energy, and Atom (and one-time medal award per star tier) is given to you when you achieve a win regardless of how many turns it takes long as it's under 300 turns. |
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Mar 14, 2016 22:05:56 GMT
Japan is the best for handling Brisbane just bring Yamamoto down to wreck Blamey.
|
|
|
|
Post by cardbattler on Mar 15, 2016 3:03:50 GMT
Actually Brisbane 1939 is the most troublesome, because it's the only year with Blamey+FieldArty there.
And Thailand stronk! (see how the country survives all those conflicts as a minor country).
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Mar 15, 2016 4:12:05 GMT
Whenever I play 1939 I just send an army to quickly get rid of Brisbane while my main troops are somewhere else. That army is normally carriers recruited in the Pacific
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 15, 2016 6:58:59 GMT
Whenever I play 1939 I just send an army to quickly get rid of Brisbane while my main troops are somewhere else. That army is normally carriers recruited in the Pacific That would be annoyingly ineffective considering the anti-air defenses there in Brisbane. A whole pack of carriers would be somewhat effective but they cost 550 gold each, so it's best in mid-game when you already have a decent chunk of the world on your hands. But then... a pack of carriers is quite helpful in dominating the Pacific. ANYTHING in the waters would just get blown out. |
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Mar 15, 2016 11:09:34 GMT
Also bring Yamamoto to speed up the conquest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Mar 15, 2016 15:32:48 GMT
I hate that you can't paradrop into Brisbane, and its only one tile aveible that can attack the city, its the worst thing it slows everyone down!
|
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Mar 15, 2016 15:34:48 GMT
Whenever I play 1939 I just send an army to quickly get rid of Brisbane while my main troops are somewhere else. That army is normally carriers recruited in the Pacific And its Also ineffective because only a smal portion of nations have III-Star ports aviable in that time. |
|
|
|
Post by cardbattler on Mar 15, 2016 16:16:00 GMT
Whenever I play 1939 I just send an army to quickly get rid of Brisbane while my main troops are somewhere else. That army is normally carriers recruited in the Pacific And its Also ineffective because only a smal portion of nations have III-Star ports aviable in that time. One of the III port is Hawaii, which is pretty close to Australia, a carrier will still need 2-3 moves to get in range, though. |
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Mar 15, 2016 18:07:34 GMT
Yeah thats true. By the way I like your profile picture  |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Mar 15, 2016 20:39:40 GMT
Whenever I play 1939 I just send an army to quickly get rid of Brisbane while my main troops are somewhere else. That army is normally carriers recruited in the Pacific And its Also ineffective because only a smal portion of nations have III-Star ports aviable in that time. It is ineffective if you do it incorrectely. The plan isn't to kill Blamey, it's to weaken him as much as possible until your actual troops come in. I also build fortifications next to him. And there's more than enough flight carriers to recruit from the US Pacific and what's left of what you used to conquer it. |
|
. And ........
