|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Mar 25, 2016 13:48:29 GMT
Eisenhower is fine. He comes from a lvl. 3 port.
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Mar 25, 2016 14:32:03 GMT
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by cardbattler on Mar 25, 2016 15:27:47 GMT
Sometimes he appeared on a super tank in DC (which reminds me of the wizard Patton), but yes, he mostly appears on a carrier which makes things easy cuz submarine spam brings him down.
|
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Mar 25, 2016 15:29:14 GMT
Eisenhower appears in 1950 which is totally fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Mar 25, 2016 16:18:04 GMT
But wasnt eisenhower president and also RESIGN from the millitary?
|
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Apr 3, 2016 13:54:55 GMT
Yes he was president but he is also commander in cheif of the military.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 4, 2016 0:55:44 GMT
Yes he was president but he is also commander in cheif of the military. It's called mulitasking like that one time where I rekt both Austria and Russia |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 4, 2016 3:07:35 GMT
Neither US. But all of the 3 star country will spawn super tanks(Timoshenko, Vatutin and Bagramyan for USSR, me for Germany, Graziani for Italy, Montgomery for UK, a normal one for Japan(while poor Itagaki only has a heavy tank), Devers for US). Montgomery is already spawned at the start of the conquest in africa So is Graziani in Rome |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 4, 2016 3:24:37 GMT
Or Vatutin spawning more in the South |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 4, 2016 3:59:44 GMT
Or Vatutin spawning more in the South But he isn't there at turn 1, unlike Graziani and Monty |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 6, 2016 22:18:36 GMT
Or Vatutin spawning more in the South But he isn't there at turn 1, unlike Graziani and Monty But his placement is logical |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 6, 2016 22:19:01 GMT
And I just want to add that he should just vanish in the middle of Ukraine
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 6, 2016 22:35:44 GMT
And I just want to add that he should just vanish in the middle of Ukraine So should Rommel sometime in 1944 (sad clap) |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 6, 2016 22:37:17 GMT
Eisenhower appears in 1950 which is totally fine. Technically in 1950 he was between jobs. In 1960 he was President, and therefore officially Commander-In-Chief of the US armed forces. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 6, 2016 23:37:14 GMT
Eisenhower appears in 1950 which is totally fine. Technically in 1950 he was between jobs. In 1960 he was President, and therefore officially Commander-In-Chief of the US armed forces. But who cares about history amirite? |
|
