|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2016 17:14:04 GMT
George S Patton jr 0* infantry
5* panzer 2* artillery 3* Air 0* navy
4* movement
Skills: Lv4 panzer, lv4 ace forces,lv3 blitzkrieg, Lv4 explosives,lv2 street fighting
PAS: Desert fighting (lv2/3) and Tide of iron
Reason: Slapped shell shocked soldiers and almost killed them, he is definitely not infantry! However, bulge shows he deserves 5* tanks and although he was not a street fighter but great at cracking SS strong points He should have got some desert skills like his counterparts Don't give this guy more than 3* stars anywhere, he was terrible commander, but was always very lucky when it comes to his high standing officers, they always saved terrible loses from defeat (almost always) |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2016 17:15:30 GMT
Japanese Navy was the best around at that time, so why 0 navy? He was no navy gen He didn't command any navy unit, but every Japanese general was thought how to fight with navy units |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Aug 27, 2016 8:34:35 GMT
@coolguy14 will you start or shall I?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2016 9:53:23 GMT
@coolguy14 will you start or shall I? I'll get to it soon. Don't worry. I just need some time. |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 27, 2016 12:57:09 GMT
@coolguy14 will you start or shall I? ?? |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Aug 27, 2016 18:50:29 GMT
@coolguy14 will you start or shall I? ?? Do u want to do generals Soviet Union in my type of format |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2016 20:26:38 GMT
Do u want to do generals Soviet Union in my type of format I will. Just give me a little to research them. |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Aug 27, 2016 20:59:22 GMT
Oh I was saying to guisan
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 27, 2016 21:09:23 GMT
Oh I was saying to guisan I still don't get it. |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Aug 27, 2016 23:38:36 GMT
Oh I was saying to guisan I still don't get it. See the first page and I'm asking you to do it like me as to what you have thought that wc3 generals stars and skills should be like |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 27, 2016 23:40:35 GMT
See the first page and I'm asking you to do it like me as to what you have thought that wc3 generals stars and skills should be like I can do an academy, sure. International would be interesting, but Frunze is gut as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2016 23:44:45 GMT
See the first page and I'm asking you to do it like me as to what you have thought that wc3 generals stars and skills should be like I can do an academy, sure. International would be interesting, but Frunze is gut as well. I'll PM you as to which ones I'm doing. Wouldn't want us to do the same |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Aug 27, 2016 23:45:54 GMT
See the first page and I'm asking you to do it like me as to what you have thought that wc3 generals stars and skills should be like I can do an academy, sure. International would be interesting, but Frunze is gut as well. I'm doing kusenetsov Timoshenko choe rokkosovsky and Voroshilov @coolguy14 is doing Zhukov Konev bagramayan and potent voronov and budyonny You can choose to do with the others |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 27, 2016 23:46:34 GMT
I can do an academy, sure. International would be interesting, but Frunze is gut as well. I'm doing kusenetsov Timoshenko choe rokkosovsky and Voroshilov @coolguy14 is doing Zhukov Konev bagramayan and potent voronov and budyonny You can choose to do with the others I can do International on top of that. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2016 23:47:50 GMT
I can do an academy, sure. International would be interesting, but Frunze is gut as well. I'm doing kusenetsov Timoshenko choe rokkosovsky and Voroshilov @coolguy14 is doing Zhukov Konev bagramayan and potent voronov and budyonny You can choose to do with the others I thought you told me to do Vasilevsky. |
|
