Philly Cheese Steak
Guest
|
Post by Philly Cheese Steak on Apr 4, 2016 2:26:48 GMT
How do I get ET (Extra Terrestial) as a general? I've heard he is at the Alien Military Academy but I can't find it.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2016 3:00:04 GMT
I don't think we can't use that General
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 4, 2016 3:25:50 GMT
There is no Alien General. There are the three Marshals though (what I find funny because Göring had the highest rank out of everybody in the whole game) who are Manstein, Zhukov, and Eisenhower
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 4, 2016 5:39:11 GMT
There is no Alien General. There are the three Marshals though (what I find funny because Göring had the highest rank out of everybody in the whole game) who are Manstein, Zhukov, and Eisenhower from wiki for Esienhower: You can't beat being in command of the biggest international forces gathered together (TWICE, 1 for WW2, then other for cold war). Nobody has a higher level of authority than Eisenhower, nobody.  |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Apr 4, 2016 5:46:45 GMT
the russian did do more in europe however
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Apr 4, 2016 5:48:27 GMT
its hard to say which army was stronger, ofx number 1 should be germany, but number 2 gets confusing, either russia or usa.
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 4, 2016 6:09:38 GMT
its hard to say which army was stronger, ofx number 1 should be germany, but number 2 gets confusing, either russia or usa. Numbers alone doesn't determine the actual achievements, Russia was pure quantity over quality. How about USA + UK + Commonwealth + almost every ally on the Allies combined (both inside Europe and outside), that's what Eisenhower had been in charge of? That's quite a lot, plus this quanity was accompanied by quality as well. |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Apr 4, 2016 6:14:12 GMT
i got to agree with the fact that the us had much more quality than russia, but when you mean the commonwealth (with no doubt the nimber 4 imo) than yes, the us + the commonwealth was stronver
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 4, 2016 6:19:20 GMT
i got to agree with the fact that the us had much more quality than russia, but when you mean the commonwealth (with no doubt the nimber 4 imo) than yes, the us + the commonwealth was stronver Eisenhower was also in command of the forces of ANZAC, S. Africa, Canada, so forth... so I shortened it to the Commonwealth. Also the South America countries joined their side, and was in cooperation with his command. Basically the Allies were under the cooridated command of Eisenhower in-lieu of agreements. Nobody has a bigger command than him because he was also the supereme commander of NATO forces in the cold war as well in a different time. |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Apr 4, 2016 7:27:56 GMT
I think the Russians would have defeated Germany on thier own. By the time D-Day was launched the Soviets already had the Germans reatreating and practicly defeated. It would have taken a few years longer and more lives would have been lost but the Soviets would have won eventully. The Russians not only had quantity but shuch great manufactoring power as well not to mention the willpower of thier troops.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 4, 2016 12:40:39 GMT
its hard to say which army was stronger, ofx number 1 should be germany, but number 2 gets confusing, either russia or usa. After WW2 clearly the Soviet Union. Operation Unthinkable would've been crushed |
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Apr 5, 2016 19:06:41 GMT
I think the Russians would have defeated Germany on thier own. By the time D-Day was launched the Soviets already had the Germans reatreating and practicly defeated. It would have taken a few years longer and more lives would have been lost but the Soviets would have won eventully. The Russians not only had quantity but shuch great manufactoring power as well not to mention the willpower of thier troops. Negative partner, the Sovjets were fighting a defencive war against Germany, huge artilleries and a massive peoples army, they Also had fast tanks, but not nearly as powerful as the German Panzer. The reason Sovjet union took Berlin, was because Hitler had ordered all his generals, to defend München and Hamburg, the big cities, by the time the generals were defeated, The Sovjets were at Berlins doorstep, After realising his fault he ordered young, sick or old (the people at Berlin) To fight for him and to defend the capital, if you need to see this in depth go watch the movie "Der Untergang" it explains the last days of Hitler and Berlin. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2016 3:03:12 GMT
I think the Russians would have defeated Germany on thier own. By the time D-Day was launched the Soviets already had the Germans reatreating and practicly defeated. It would have taken a few years longer and more lives would have been lost but the Soviets would have won eventully. The Russians not only had quantity but shuch great manufactoring power as well not to mention the willpower of thier troops. Negative partner, the Sovjets were fighting a defencive war against Germany, huge artilleries and a massive peoples army, they Also had fast tanks, but not nearly as powerful as the German Panzer. The reason Sovjet union took Berlin, was because Hitler had ordered all his generals, to defend München and Hamburg, the big cities, by the time the generals were defeated, The Sovjets were at Berlins doorstep, After realising his fault he ordered young, sick or old (the people at Berlin) To fight for him and to defend the capital, if you need to see this in depth go watch the movie "Der Untergang" it explains the last days of Hitler and Berlin. "Der Untergang" was a very good movie |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jul 23, 2016 1:34:50 GMT
i got to agree with the fact that the us had much more quality than russia, but when you mean the commonwealth (with no doubt the nimber 4 imo) than yes, the us + the commonwealth was stronver Eisenhower was also in command of the forces of ANZAC, S. Africa, Canada, so forth... so I shortened it to the Commonwealth. Also the South America countries joined their side, and was in cooperation with his command. Basically the Allies were under the cooridated command of Eisenhower in-lieu of agreements. Nobody has a bigger command than him because he was also the supereme commander of NATO forces in the cold war as well in a different time. Not to mention that he commanded Montgomery and Patton's huge egos |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2016 4:07:40 GMT
There is no Alien General. There are the three Marshals though (what I find funny because Göring had the highest rank out of everybody in the whole game) who are Manstein, Zhukov, and Eisenhower from wiki for Esienhower: You can't beat being in command of the biggest international forces gathered together (TWICE, 1 for WW2, then other for cold war). Nobody has a higher level of authority than Eisenhower, nobody. You know it, pal. |
|
