|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 10, 2016 18:41:33 GMT
I dont call: "iran has to leave saudi arabia" as a fair treaty Iran gets an equal number of provinces in return. So yes, it's fair |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 10, 2016 18:42:54 GMT
I dont call: "iran has to leave saudi arabia" as a fair treaty well great, all my effort is useless ,you already get 6 total provinces (you already have 4 as Iran) and you STILL want more? STILL? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 10, 2016 18:45:59 GMT
What the feck NetherFreek?! Get real. You gain nothing from the continuation of this argument |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 10, 2016 18:52:27 GMT
What the feck NetherFreek?! Get real. You gain nothing from the continuation of this argument true, after all you caused the mess Instead of giving land to UN as a sign of reparations you want more!!! Nope |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 10, 2016 18:53:36 GMT
It's weird that people kill the war 99% then they want more land? Wow!
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Apr 10, 2016 19:05:37 GMT
First, i wasnt forced to sign that stupid peace treaty. Second, i didnt cause the mess, all my turns were perfectly fair. Third, im not the one who cries for more, i dont want peace in the middle east at all, but if you want it, fine. But dont expect me to lose saudi arabia and basically declare all my turns invalid. I dont want afghanistan and oman, i want Tabuk and north sharqiyah, and WTH can gb keep syria but cant india keep north yemen?!?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 10, 2016 19:11:55 GMT
First, i wasnt forced to sign that stupid peace treaty. Second, i didnt cause the mess, all my turns were perfectly fair. Third, im not the one who cries for more, i dont want peace in the middle east at all, but if you want it, fine. But dont expect me to lose saudi arabia and basically declare all my turns invalid. I dont want afghanistan and oman, i want Tabuk and north sharqiyah, and WTH can gb keep syria but cant india keep north yemen?!? I wasn't aware of the North Yemen thing when I wrote Antwerp. India cam have it, if Tabuk is UN |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 10, 2016 19:15:01 GMT
First, i wasnt forced to sign that stupid peace treaty. Second, i didnt cause the mess, all my turns were perfectly fair. Third, im not the one who cries for more, i dont want peace in the middle east at all, but if you want it, fine. But dont expect me to lose saudi arabia and basically declare all my turns invalid. I dont want afghanistan and oman, i want Tabuk and north sharqiyah, and WTH can gb keep syria but cant india keep north yemen?!? I wasn't aware of the North Yemen thing when I wrote Antwerp. India cam have it, if Tabuk is UN I just want to clarify for people, on the map, a part of Yemen is called Abyan, that's where Saudi Arabia took over, then India took it. That's exactly where I did my latest India turn before the second peace summit. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 10, 2016 19:17:50 GMT
So technically it never should have been Saudi.
Mazal Tov India!
NATO rep at the table approves it
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Apr 10, 2016 19:25:43 GMT
First, i wasnt forced to sign that stupid peace treaty. Second, i didnt cause the mess, all my turns were perfectly fair. Third, im not the one who cries for more, i dont want peace in the middle east at all, but if you want it, fine. But dont expect me to lose saudi arabia and basically declare all my turns invalid. I dont want afghanistan and oman, i want Tabuk and north sharqiyah, and WTH can gb keep syria but cant india keep north yemen?!? I wasn't aware of the North Yemen thing when I wrote Antwerp. India cam have it, if Tabuk is UN Tabuk can be UN, but suez channel must be untor wto regime, nato troops in europe have to move al the coast in africa to move to asia. Also if the UN wants Tabuk, i want 7 inf as compensation for the lost province and for the troops i lost at the iran-saudi war. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 10, 2016 19:33:01 GMT
I wasn't aware of the North Yemen thing when I wrote Antwerp. India cam have it, if Tabuk is UN Tabuk can be UN, but suez channel must be untor wto regime, nato troops in europe have to move al the coast in africa to move to asia. Also if the UN wants Tabuk, i want 7 inf as compensation for the lost province and for the troops i lost at the iran-saudi war. , you almost broke the war. Your moves, albeit legal, were immoral. I'm willing to offer a shutdown of the Suez Canal, but stop asking for more rewards |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Apr 10, 2016 19:34:46 GMT
Tabuk can be UN, but suez channel must be untor wto regime, nato troops in europe have to move al the coast in africa to move to asia. Also if the UN wants Tabuk, i want 7 inf as compensation for the lost province and for the troops i lost at the iran-saudi war. , you almost broke the war. Your moves, albeit legal, were immoral. I'm willing to offer a shutdown of the Suez Canal, but stop asking for more rewards Can you tell me what i did wrong? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 10, 2016 19:38:24 GMT
NetherFreek , you almost broke the war. Your moves, albeit legal, were immoral. I'm willing to offer a shutdown of the Suez Canal, but stop asking for more rewards Can you tell me what i did wrong? Your invasion. It was legal, but it was slimy. WTO got duly compensated in that treaty. You just didn't like it. Instead of being mature and talking to Peron, or Khurram, or anyone, you invaded. And now you're asking for gains way beyond what your attack made. You fully took 2 provinces, you fully get 2 provinces. You don't get 4 provinces or 3 Provinces and 7 armies. GROW UP |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Apr 10, 2016 19:45:28 GMT
Can you tell me what i did wrong? Your invasion. It was legal, but it was slimy. WTO got duly compensated in that treaty. You just didn't like it. Instead of being mature and talking to Peron, or Khurram, or anyone, you invaded. And now you're asking for gains way beyond what your attack made. You fully took 2 provinces, you fully get 2 provinces. You don't get 4 provinces or 3 Provinces and 7 armies. GROW UP I never said that i want more provinces. But as you said i took those provinces. Why cant i just control the provinces i took? Why do i need to take 2 random provinces in the map which i didnt need to. And if there wasnt peace, the wto would have rekt nato in the middle east, its just dumb if you denie that. So yes, i want some compensation for the provinces i would have conquered, and if you cant even see that, im not the one who needs to grow up and start acting mature, but you are. So my final offer I get tabuk and north sharqiyah and israel needs to pay me 5 inf for me being kind to keep them alive |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 10, 2016 19:49:27 GMT
Your invasion. It was legal, but it was slimy. WTO got duly compensated in that treaty. You just didn't like it. Instead of being mature and talking to Peron, or Khurram, or anyone, you invaded. And now you're asking for gains way beyond what your attack made. You fully took 2 provinces, you fully get 2 provinces. You don't get 4 provinces or 3 Provinces and 7 armies. GROW UP I never said that i want more provinces. But as you said i took those provinces. Why cant i just control the provinces i took? Why do i need to take 2 random provinces in the map which i didnt need to. And if there wasnt peace, the wto would have rekt nato in the middle east, its just dumb if you denie that. So yes, i want some compensation for the provinces i would have conquered, and if you cant even see that, im not the one who needs to grow up and start acting mature, but you are. So my final offer I get tabuk and north sharqiyah and israel needs to pay me 5 inf for me being kind to keep them alive Unrealistic. It would take you longer to kill Israel. And GB is still there. And why are you so emotionally attached to Tabuk? Short answer: NO |
|
