|
Generals
May 2, 2016 19:41:24 GMT
via mobile
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on May 2, 2016 19:41:24 GMT
Sorry I mixed up my tier (I always fell they are actually 5 tiers (grey, green, 4 emblems blue, 6 emblems blue, purple) anyway tier 2 and 3 I think the consensus is Golitsyn or Sulkowski for cav, Oudinot or Dobeln for Infantry, scharnhorst for arty (for fort smashing, Drummond is a beast, speaking from experience here). For Navy I had my best experience with Sidney, but I am sure that Ushakov is pretty good. Sidney actually has better skills than Ushakov, but Ushakov is OK for Artillery and can fill the last slot. Kate is better than either, except as last slot. For EndEndEndgame, I find Victoria+Propellor is great as Navy-Infantry for me
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 2, 2016 19:59:11 GMT
Sorry I mixed up my tier (I always fell they are actually 5 tiers (grey, green, 4 emblems blue, 6 emblems blue, purple) anyway tier 2 and 3 I think the consensus is Golitsyn or Sulkowski for cav, Oudinot or Dobeln for Infantry, scharnhorst for arty (for fort smashing, Drummond is a beast, speaking from experience here). For Navy I had my best experience with Sidney, but I am sure that Ushakov is pretty good. Sidney actually has better skills than Ushakov, but Ushakov is OK for Artillery and can fill the last slot. Kate is better than either, except as last slot. For EndEndEndgame, I find Victoria+Propellor is great as Navy-Infantry for me For instant power, Ushakov>Sidney, both navy and army, after fully regrouped(navy, Ushakov's arty, Sidney's inf), Sidney>Ushakov on navy, Ushakov>>Sidney on army. Kate=Sidney+Collingwood(I basically ignored Sailor and Ballistics).
|
|
|
Post by Washington on May 2, 2016 20:11:21 GMT
Sidney actually has better skills than Ushakov, but Ushakov is OK for Artillery and can fill the last slot. Kate is better than either, except as last slot. For EndEndEndgame, I find Victoria+Propellor is great as Navy-Infantry for me For instant power, Ushakov>Sidney, both navy and army, after fully regrouped(navy, Ushakov's arty, Sidney's inf), Sidney>Ushakov on navy, Ushakov>>Sidney on army. Kate=Sidney+Collingwood(I basically ignored Sailor and Ballistics). Honestly 2* arty isnt great. (duckworth is better than ushakov on land)
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 2, 2016 20:28:55 GMT
For instant power, Ushakov>Sidney, both navy and army, after fully regrouped(navy, Ushakov's arty, Sidney's inf), Sidney>Ushakov on navy, Ushakov>>Sidney on army. Kate=Sidney+Collingwood(I basically ignored Sailor and Ballistics). Honestly 2* arty isnt great. (duckworth is better than ushakov on land) 2*arty+Accurate>3*inf imo. Duckworth and Hood are cheap and nice navy-arty generals though.
|
|
|
Post by Washington on May 2, 2016 20:42:44 GMT
Do note though sidney is more focused on his purpose
|
|