|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on May 7, 2016 9:37:49 GMT
Why early? I had already stuck with missions. Mannerheim let me clear some five more and now I have one mission, which my genarals make 27%, so they will make it soon or late. And in challenges he is very usefull. I have cleared the last 5th challenge - accumulate supplies, which was impossible without him. Sure, I could build oil wonder to do that, but anyway first 6th challenge I have tried now seems clearable, and before there were no chance to win. Not sure about campaign, there will likely any tank or artillery general would be much better, but anyway campaign was ok even without him (till aliens), so infantry will be ok. In conquest game... don't know, in 39 I have got 150 medals and all 4 wonders, 43 haven't tried, but I think I will not regret my choice. If you need infantry in some challenges or missions while others unavailable, you better have Guderian, Crerar or Konev that could do infantry, which can also be use on other types of unit. For me I see no point having an infantry-only general on any stage. When noticed you haven't try 1943 I think the missions I am reaching is much far and harder compared to yours, while I don't even need a pure infantry general. 0.0 Hmm... As I remember, I haven't write, which missions I can clear an which I can't. Also, as I figured out, if you have 20 or less percents, you can't clear it. If you have 21 or more, than you can, only depends the chance of success. And the only criteria there is appropriate skills. |
|
|
|
Post by Amatsukaze on May 7, 2016 10:02:18 GMT
If you need infantry in some challenges or missions while others unavailable, you better have Guderian, Crerar or Konev that could do infantry, which can also be use on other types of unit. For me I see no point having an infantry-only general on any stage. When noticed you haven't try 1943 I think the missions I am reaching is much far and harder compared to yours, while I don't even need a pure infantry general. 0.0 Hmm... As I remember, I haven't write, which missions I can clear an which I can't. Also, as I figured out, if you have 20 or less percents, you can't clear it. If you have 21 or more, than you can, only depends the chance of success. And the only criteria there is appropriate skills. No matter how, a pure infantry general is not in need. 0.0 |
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on May 7, 2016 10:32:22 GMT
Hmm... As I remember, I haven't write, which missions I can clear an which I can't. Also, as I figured out, if you have 20 or less percents, you can't clear it. If you have 21 or more, than you can, only depends the chance of success. And the only criteria there is appropriate skills. No matter how, a pure infantry general is not in need. 0.0 If I have only 21% even with 5 stars infantry general, it means without him I will have less and mission will be unclearable. Possibly, if I had better other guys, it could be worth to sacrifice a bit infantry in order to get better tank or artillery, but as my composite budget for all generals for now is not worth even Guderian and Konev, I have to make such pervertions. |
|
|
|
Post by Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel on May 7, 2016 10:37:42 GMT
Why early? I had already stuck with missions. Mannerheim let me clear some five more and now I have one mission, which my genarals make 27%, so they will make it soon or late. And in challenges he is very usefull. I have cleared the last 5th challenge - accumulate supplies, which was impossible without him. Sure, I could build oil wonder to do that, but anyway first 6th challenge I have tried now seems clearable, and before there were no chance to win. Not sure about campaign, there will likely any tank or artillery general would be much better, but anyway campaign was ok even without him (till aliens), so infantry will be ok. In conquest game... don't know, in 39 I have got 150 medals and all 4 wonders, 43 haven't tried, but I think I will not regret my choice. If you need infantry in some challenges or missions while others unavailable, you better have Guderian, Crerar or Konev that could do infantry, which can also be use on other types of unit. For me I see no point having an infantry-only general on any stage. When noticed you haven't try 1943 I think the missions I am reaching is much far and harder compared to yours, while I don't even need a pure infantry general. 0.0 Ah, yes. Plain fighters are the best fighter. But Mannerheim, when used wisely is better than Vasilevsky. Supply lv 2 makes him recyclable. Raider makes him really tough. However, Vasilevsky could double as arty gen. |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on May 7, 2016 11:09:06 GMT
I prefer yamashita, why?
His firepower is good enough, not epic. But good enough.
I rarely use inf for attacking purpose. since inf is weak. Even valivesky cant stand a tank general. I use inf for speeding things up. I want my inf to be there every single time, i want my inf to be quick.
And guess what? Yamashita has 5* movement
|
|
|
|
Post by dutchguy123 on May 7, 2016 11:37:14 GMT
I prefer yamashita, why? His firepower is good enough, not epic. But good enough. I rarely use inf for attacking purpose. since inf is weak. Even valivesky cant stand a tank general. I use inf for speeding things up. I want my inf to be there every single time, i want my inf to be quick. And guess what? Yamashita has 5* movement ok, then you'll need him! |
|
|
|
Post by Amatsukaze on May 7, 2016 11:57:38 GMT
No matter how, a pure infantry general is not in need. 0.0 If I have only 21% even with 5 stars infantry general, it means without him I will have less and mission will be unclearable. Possibly, if I had better other guys, it could be worth to sacrifice a bit infantry in order to get better tank or artillery, but as my composite budget for all generals for now is not worth even Guderian and Konev, I have to make such pervertions. Wonder if what generals do you have for now, and medal wonders?0.0 |
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on May 7, 2016 12:19:52 GMT
If you need infantry in some challenges or missions while others unavailable, you better have Guderian, Crerar or Konev that could do infantry, which can also be use on other types of unit. For me I see no point having an infantry-only general on any stage. When noticed you haven't try 1943 I think the missions I am reaching is much far and harder compared to yours, while I don't even need a pure infantry general. 0.0 Ah, yes. Plain fighters are the best fighter. But Mannerheim, when used wisely is better than Vasilevsky. Supply lv 2 makes him recyclable. Raider makes him really tough. However, Vasilevsky could double as arty gen. Worst thing is that Raider may occure and may not occure. But I think they are very close and in some situation one has advantages, in other - other one. |
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on May 7, 2016 12:25:57 GMT
Ah, yes. Plain fighters are the best fighter. But Mannerheim, when used wisely is better than Vasilevsky. Supply lv 2 makes him recyclable. Raider makes him really tough. However, Vasilevsky could double as arty gen. Worst thing is that Raider may occure and may not occure. But I think they are very close and in some situation one has advantages, in other - other one. I have Weichs, Badoglio, Bradley, Mannerheim and just bought Koga to get extra 5 air/sea stars. Medal wonders I have +1 and +2 and wonder +2 I have just built. |
|
|
|
Post by Amatsukaze on May 7, 2016 13:26:12 GMT
Worst thing is that Raider may occure and may not occure. But I think they are very close and in some situation one has advantages, in other - other one. I have Weichs, Badoglio, Bradley, Mannerheim and just bought Koga to get extra 5 air/sea stars. Medal wonders I have +1 and +2 and wonder +2 I have just built. I think I know what's the problem them. |
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on May 7, 2016 13:47:29 GMT
I have Weichs, Badoglio, Bradley, Mannerheim and just bought Koga to get extra 5 air/sea stars. Medal wonders I have +1 and +2 and wonder +2 I have just built. I think I know what's the problem them. Me too. But this problem persists from the very, very begining, and seems like globally it is impossible to solve it . |
|
|
|
Post by dutchguy123 on May 7, 2016 14:15:53 GMT
I think I know what's the problem them. Me too. But this problem persists from the very, very begining, and seems like globally it is impossible to solve it . I have no clue, maybe saying it now helps me providing it. pls? |
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on May 7, 2016 16:14:30 GMT
Me too. But this problem persists from the very, very begining, and seems like globally it is impossible to solve it . I have no clue, maybe saying it now helps me providing it. pls? Hmm... how to explain it... Just there are such objects, which always cause the problems. |
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on May 7, 2016 17:49:59 GMT
Proceeding with missions just let me get terracota army . So it was really worth. The only problem, I just colleted 140 000 industry for City of Cuzco and Angkor Wat and thought that at last I will be able to upgrade something... The only good thing, that I will collect some tech during that time and will not have to choose to upgrade aircraft or tanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on May 10, 2016 3:52:27 GMT
I prefer yamashita, why? His firepower is good enough, not epic. But good enough. I rarely use inf for attacking purpose. since inf is weak. Even valivesky cant stand a tank general. I use inf for speeding things up. I want my inf to be there every single time, i want my inf to be quick. And guess what? Yamashita has 5* movement As long as you only use him for Motor Infantry you should be fine. I suppose pairing him with someone like Guderian with latter just clearing every city and Yamashita taking it could be a good tactic but well...nukes |
|
