Bismarck
First Lieutenant
Orange
Posts: 19 
|
Post by Bismarck on Oct 26, 2015 13:03:03 GMT
Half tempted to spam for an increased Rank.
Imagine if I get General Bismarck.
Heh.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 26, 2015 13:50:01 GMT
That's not recommended. I speak from experience :/
|
|
|
|
Post by Rahul Santiago on Mar 12, 2016 18:52:37 GMT
Thanks bro for that tactics but
I completed 1943 conquest with cuba
I'll use this strategy
Can you post about 1960 Indian campaign
In 40 rounds in west I captured saudi arabia and reached the Brazilian border
And in east I successfully resists Australian attack in north west I entered south east Europe but after this I'm running out of money and too much Nato forces are coming and I can't resist Americans in far east asia and in europe
Also failing to conquer Brazil's mainland
|
|
|
|
Post by exodus71 on Dec 21, 2016 18:39:56 GMT
I more prefer using germany in 1939&1943. I finished both in 51 turns. In 1939 it was really easy for germany, you can Put your forces to defense from soviet and allied countries in africa. While you defense in there,put your main forces to the north, Conquer the easy Countries and slowly invade uk. If UK is conquered it's your win. At this point japan almost conquered almost half of the soviet and axis power almost dominate africa. Just need a bit of forces then you go conquer the soviet and remaining allies in africa. After that's done, conquer ottawa, washington and NY. It pretty much takes 3-5 turns because you already have so much gold. 5-7 more turns you can conquer all the america lands. At this point, only midway,hawaii,australia and southeast asia remained (japan failed to conquer southeast asia for me). March your forces from asia to southeast asia and australia while forces from america march to midway and hawaii and done. For 1943 there wasn't any big difference, just it was really hard at the beginning because soviet was putting best Generals to attack my lands and allied forces in africa was really strong too. Same as 1939, destroying UK was the main point. BUT when destroying UK you must keep the east from soviet no matter what because that's the key to conquer soviet and india. After UK is conquered, destroy the remaining allied forces in africa. March your troops to brazil,cuba,mexico,america,and Canada. At this point america and canada was easy to beat with air forces. After the america is fully conquered, i take japan mainland first because america defeat it in thr start. Finally go to australia and done.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Dec 21, 2016 19:22:25 GMT
I more prefer using germany in 1939&1943. I finished both in 51 turns. In 1939 it was really easy for germany, you can Put your forces to defense from soviet and allied countries in africa. While you defense in there,put your main forces to the north, Conquer the easy Countries and slowly invade uk. If UK is conquered it's your win. At this point japan almost conquered almost half of the soviet and axis power almost dominate africa. Just need a bit of forces then you go conquer the soviet and remaining allies in africa. After that's done, conquer ottawa, washington and NY. It pretty much takes 3-5 turns because you already have so much gold. 5-7 more turns you can conquer all the america lands. At this point, only midway,hawaii,australia and southeast asia remained (japan failed to conquer southeast asia for me). March your forces from asia to southeast asia and australia while forces from america march to midway and hawaii and done. For 1943 there wasn't any big difference, just it was really hard at the beginning because soviet was putting best Generals to attack my lands and allied forces in africa was really strong too. Same as 1939, destroying UK was the main point. BUT when destroying UK you must keep the east from soviet no matter what because that's the key to conquer soviet and india. After UK is conquered, destroy the remaining allied forces in africa. March your troops to brazil,cuba,mexico,america,and Canada. At this point america and canada was easy to beat with air forces. After the america is fully conquered, i take japan mainland first because america defeat it in thr start. Finally go to australia and done. Now that's different. Playing as a major country (Germany) is a very different experience than a minor like India. Germany is easier, but smaller countries like India can be much more fun |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2016 6:57:26 GMT
I more prefer using germany in 1939&1943. I finished both in 51 turns. In 1939 it was really easy for germany, you can Put your forces to defense from soviet and allied countries in africa. While you defense in there,put your main forces to the north, Conquer the easy Countries and slowly invade uk. If UK is conquered it's your win. At this point japan almost conquered almost half of the soviet and axis power almost dominate africa. Just need a bit of forces then you go conquer the soviet and remaining allies in africa. After that's done, conquer ottawa, washington and NY. It pretty much takes 3-5 turns because you already have so much gold. 5-7 more turns you can conquer all the america lands. At this point, only midway,hawaii,australia and southeast asia remained (japan failed to conquer southeast asia for me). March your forces from asia to southeast asia and australia while forces from america march to midway and hawaii and done. For 1943 there wasn't any big difference, just it was really hard at the beginning because soviet was putting best Generals to attack my lands and allied forces in africa was really strong too. Same as 1939, destroying UK was the main point. BUT when destroying UK you must keep the east from soviet no matter what because that's the key to conquer soviet and india. After UK is conquered, destroy the remaining allied forces in africa. March your troops to brazil,cuba,mexico,america,and Canada. At this point america and canada was easy to beat with air forces. After the america is fully conquered, i take japan mainland first because america defeat it in thr start. Finally go to australia and done. Now that's different. Playing as a major country (Germany) is a very different experience than a minor like India. Germany is easier, but smaller countries like India can be much more fun I'm not trying to go off topic, but I agree that sometimes playing as countries like India make this game interesting! Challenges are amazing and seeing how quick you can do something is so much fun! I definitely agree with you on that Jean-Luc Picard!  |
|
|
|
Post by genghiskhan on Jan 22, 2017 3:55:37 GMT
I have never won a conquest yet and this is really working! Thank You.
|
|
|
|
Post by benjamin on Jan 31, 2017 19:39:53 GMT
One thing I will say for all players playing as germany in 1939. Do not try to build up your army then go after your enemys. I am good but not the best in WC3. This is just a advice.
|
|
|
|
Post by tiger27 on May 25, 2017 3:22:31 GMT
in 1939 bulgaria, finland, germany, japan. if you want a challenge poland.943 japan, germany. i have personally completed these conquests with those countrys
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on May 25, 2017 20:52:03 GMT
in 1939 bulgaria, finland, germany, japan. if you want a challenge poland.943 japan, germany. i have personally completed these conquests with those countrys WHY are you necroing this old thread?  This is about playing India 1943, nothing more. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2017 18:15:58 GMT
This strategy really works.You don't need strong generals for it.Thanks for posting it.
|
|
This is about playing India 1943, nothing more. 
