|
|
Post by dutchguy123 on May 8, 2016 7:35:39 GMT
I have undownload this game for many times to start over again, but should it be handy to play it on the computer as well? I mean if you link your account, you can play on the computer with the same things.  |
|
|
|
Post by Amatsukaze on May 8, 2016 9:59:17 GMT
I have undownload this game for many times to start over again, but should it be handy to play it on the computer as well? I mean if you link your account, you can play on the computer with the same things. MULTIPLAYER CONQUEST! ヽ（・∀・）ノ |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on May 8, 2016 11:12:47 GMT
Multiplayer mode would be awesome. Although the waiting time till the other one(s) make(s) their move would be long, i still think its doable, since computer is predictive and players arent. Anyhow, i think conquest would be too much. There are like 20 nations in the map, so 20 players. If they all need to do their turn, with as gap between them 1 hour. (Most will be shorter, but when one is offline or sleeping it could last a few hours) so basiccely 20 hours between a single phase... and knowing that a conquest wont be finished in a phase it would be way to long.
So only small campaign with 2-4 playersand it would be amazing
|
|
|
|
Post by dutchguy123 on May 8, 2016 11:23:21 GMT
Multiplayer mode would be awesome. Although the waiting time till the other one(s) make(s) their move would be long, i still think its doable, since computer is predictive and players arent. Anyhow, i think conquest would be too much. There are like 20 nations in the map, so 20 players. If they all need to do their turn, with as gap between them 1 hour. (Most will be shorter, but when one is offline or sleeping it could last a few hours) so basiccely 20 hours between a single phase... and knowing that a conquest wont be finished in a phase it would be way to long. So only small campaign with 2-4 playersand it would be amazing maybe do a little map, or do level changer (don't know how its called again) |
|
|
|
Post by Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel on May 8, 2016 13:00:49 GMT
Multiplayer mode would be awesome. Although the waiting time till the other one(s) make(s) their move would be long, i still think its doable, since computer is predictive and players arent. Anyhow, i think conquest would be too much. There are like 20 nations in the map, so 20 players. If they all need to do their turn, with as gap between them 1 hour. (Most will be shorter, but when one is offline or sleeping it could last a few hours) so basiccely 20 hours between a single phase... and knowing that a conquest wont be finished in a phase it would be way to long. So only small campaign with 2-4 playersand it would be amazing maybe do a little map, or do level changer (don't know how its called again) Why not just let the server AI do the job when a player gets tired? (I know it would make terrain based generals useless and fort-spam not happening). And since there are 500 active players/day, and only less than 10 of them are forum lurkers, I'm pretty sure there will be match between a guy that uses bad but expensive generals and a guy that uses Erich von Manstein-approved generals.  |
|
|
|
Post by cardbattler on May 8, 2016 13:06:27 GMT
Well, of course multiplayer with no more than 5 players (maybe 6, in case all are super-active and are friends that won't get angry because the other takes too long) is sure to be fun, like, a super-pro player plays a 1-star country against 4 friends using 3 star countries.
Or 6 friends all doing 1975 conquest.
Just thinking about it makes me excited.
|
|
|
|
Post by dutchguy123 on May 8, 2016 13:16:16 GMT
Multiplayer mode would be awesome. Although the waiting time till the other one(s) make(s) their move would be long, i still think its doable, since computer is predictive and players arent. Anyhow, i think conquest would be too much. There are like 20 nations in the map, so 20 players. If they all need to do their turn, with as gap between them 1 hour. (Most will be shorter, but when one is offline or sleeping it could last a few hours) so basiccely 20 hours between a single phase... and knowing that a conquest wont be finished in a phase it would be way to long. So only small campaign with 2-4 playersand it would be amazing maybe do a little map, or do level changer (don't know how its called again) level editor, I got it |
|
|
|
Post by dutchguy123 on May 8, 2016 13:18:21 GMT
Well, of course multiplayer with no more than 5 players (maybe 6, in case all are super-active and are friends that won't get angry because the other takes too long) is sure to be fun, like, a super-pro player plays a 1-star country against 4 friends using 3 star countries. Or 6 friends all doing 1975 conquest. Just thinking about it makes me excited. I agree, but alot of games are being played, so I don't think they would play with each other. I really hope they would do that! |
|
|
|
Post by wollesu on May 8, 2016 17:36:18 GMT
Online WC3 would be sooooo awesome. Imagine Conquest mode but more logical
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 8, 2016 17:58:30 GMT
We actually tried in in the Chinese forum, UK+USSR vs Germany+Italy, but it stopped soon because too many units and hard to control by 1 person.
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on May 8, 2016 18:32:11 GMT
If Easytech goes online for this, I am afraid soon they will be tempted into making DLC, paywalls, 'freemium' stuff, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by wollesu on May 8, 2016 18:39:49 GMT
If Easytech goes online for this, I am afraid soon they will be tempted into making DLC, paywalls, 'freemium' stuff, etc. Not really. Easytech does not have a history relating to abusive DLCs and fremuums. Manstein , Zhukov and Eisenhower are $19.99 because EasyTech needs at least some revenue. Since WC3 is WW2 and Cold War they could soon add content , such as new missions and generals. Its unlikely though , they havent updated since Aug 2015 EasyTech could add some DLC but it will mostly be harmless and doesnt hamper the game. |
|
|
|
Post by dutchguy123 on May 8, 2016 18:53:45 GMT
We actually tried in in the Chinese forum, UK+USSR vs Germany+Italy, but it stopped soon because too many units and hard to control by 1 person. 2 questions, you speak Chinese? How would you get Germany AND Italy in one hand?(Is there any modding?) |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 8, 2016 19:34:41 GMT
We actually tried in in the Chinese forum, UK+USSR vs Germany+Italy, but it stopped soon because too many units and hard to control by 1 person. 2 questions, you speak Chinese? How would you get Germany AND Italy in one hand?(Is there any modding?) I AM Chinese. There were 5 people involved in this game, one for each country, and one controls the movement. It is a modded version. We ended it because too hard for 1 single person.(we might can do it if we have 2~3 people controlling one country) |
|
|
|
Post by dutchguy123 on May 9, 2016 14:10:15 GMT
2 questions, you speak Chinese? How would you get Germany AND Italy in one hand?(Is there any modding?) I AM Chinese. There were 5 people involved in this game, one for each country, and one controls the movement. It is a modded version. We ended it because too hard for 1 single person.(we might can do it if we have 2~3 people controlling one country) But can't you make a level editor multiplayer, Belgium against the Netherlands (the rest is neutral or something), or UK against USA? That would be awesome?! What I mean is; make a room with different countries fighting against each other, then you wait till your room is full and you start! (I mean that would be awesome) |
|
