|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Jun 7, 2016 20:25:35 GMT
Best speedrunning for 1809... Maybe Austria? They have Radetzky, Archduke C. and lots of other generals. And 1775 US is great for Lan-rushing. 1809 really isn't good for speedrunning at all. The shallowed Russia would make it easy on France, but Spain is coalition. Austria has to intervene in Poland and deal with Murat. Prussia is generally shrunk, and Russia's shallowness on the East-west axis truncates its Economy. That's true, I was just picking the best. And even if Prussia shrunks, it has more generals, including Scharnhorst and Blucher.(yes, I know he sucks, but at least he has 5*cav) |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jun 7, 2016 20:30:27 GMT
1809 really isn't good for speedrunning at all. The shallowed Russia would make it easy on France, but Spain is coalition. Austria has to intervene in Poland and deal with Murat. Prussia is generally shrunk, and Russia's shallowness on the East-west axis truncates its Economy. That's true, I was just picking the best. And even if Prussia shrunks, it has more generals, including Scharnhorst and Blucher.(yes, I know he sucks, but at least he has 5*cav) The shrinking results in poorer Econ and less units near Turkey. Plus Poniatowski, Dombrowski, and Sulkowski |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Jun 14, 2016 8:04:03 GMT
1809 could be a good speedrunning scenario with Austria but Denmark and Sweden are the problem
|
|
