|
|
Post by kanue on Jun 23, 2016 15:53:30 GMT
is there any point of having murat if sophia is better than him at fort cracking? even though he is good, he seems useless to have if you only have 5 or 6 slots. Two fort crackers is better than one and I find forts are much more annoying than anything else.  So both of them would be in my lineup if I bought emblems, but I did not. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Jun 24, 2016 13:02:08 GMT
Better than lasalle and lan right? Waaay better than Lasalle. A faster, low output version of Lan. So this Lannes vs Lan is speed vs punch Which is both right and wrong. Lannes went more for output but also lead the advanced corps in his most famous time |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Jun 24, 2016 13:02:46 GMT
yea but it's better for cavalry. Who is better in your opinion, suvurov or lannes on infantry? On infantry, Suvorov in general, Lannes |
|
|
|
Post by Torvesta on Jun 24, 2016 16:29:37 GMT
Players should stop comparing suvurov with lannes. Lannes isn't an infantry general, he is more of a hybrid. He is a good hybrid but he is pretty much the same as poniatowski (best hybrid in game) who only costs 6 shields. I think lannes costs 8 shields so it's better to go for poniatowski
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jun 27, 2016 18:29:23 GMT
Yup. Lannes is more bang, but Mass Fire vs Fireproof doesn't justify 2 EMBLEMS
|
|
|
|
Post by Torvesta on Jun 27, 2016 18:32:59 GMT
Do you mean Suvurov is more bang? Not Lannes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jun 27, 2016 18:37:41 GMT
Do you mean Suvurov is more bang? Not Lannes. I was talking about Poniatowski vs Lannes. Suvorov vs Lannes, in addition to having been a tearful debate months ago, is a dumb one since they don't fill the same role |
|
|
|
Post by Torvesta on Jun 27, 2016 18:41:05 GMT
yea mass fire isn't worth 2 emblems,
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jun 27, 2016 18:42:40 GMT
yea mass fire isn't worth 2 emblems, Easytech seem to value it at 45 medals (Zakrevsky-Latour=45 medals+Mass Fire) |
|
|
|
Post by lansalle on Jun 27, 2016 19:51:11 GMT
i think the best hybrid general is poniatowski.
geography: cavalry and artillery (infantry movement always unaffected by terrain without geography skill or warhorse)
fireproof: all
assault art: all
leadership: all
but poniatowski needs more effort to be fully developed hybrid. i'm not interested in him though
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jun 27, 2016 20:30:53 GMT
i think the best hybrid general is poniatowski. geography: cavalry and artillery (infantry movement always unaffected by terrain without geography skill or warhorse) fireproof: all assault art: all leadership: all but poniatowski needs more effort to be fully developed hybrid. i'm not interested in him though I personally think he's worth it, but to each his own |
|
|
|
Post by Yi Sun Sin on Jun 30, 2016 22:23:55 GMT
Davout is pretty good in cav and artillery
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jun 30, 2016 22:28:21 GMT
Davout is pretty good in cav and artillery Finally! Someone gets me! 6 hex heavy cav club, Assault Art, and output skills! |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Jul 1, 2016 2:02:06 GMT
My best hybrid in imagination: Siege Master+Leadership+Assault Art+Geography/Spy.
Siege Master: we need to attack someone in cities, always.
Leadership: no more problems with cav charging, flanking or surrounding.
Assault Art: s&l when necessary.
Geography: Light/Heavy cav&Light arty&Rocket can run faster.
Spy: Fort smasher is always great.
|
|
|
|
Post by lansalle on Jul 1, 2016 9:51:54 GMT
My best hybrid in imagination: Siege Master+Leadership+Assault Art+Geography/Spy. does siege master increase damage to all troops? sometimes i just think that it is a building-oriented skill. but there is "against troops" in the description. still doubtful though |
|
