|
|
Post by Torvesta on Jun 29, 2016 6:17:37 GMT
but in the game, lannes is not the best infantry, blame easytech for not making him as good as he actually was. The only way he beats suvurov is if his assault art triggers (s/l)
|
|
|
|
Post by Torvesta on Jun 29, 2016 6:19:12 GMT
but you said he can do 200 damage on MG, if lanne's assault art doesnt trigger, dobeln does more damage.
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Jun 29, 2016 6:20:00 GMT
Victoria>Suvorov>Lannes>Dobeln>Oudinot>Picton>Hull IMO Put that Lannes first will you  , leadership ftw REASON: MORALE CAN NOT DROP + HEALTH DOES NOT INFLUENCE FIGHTING ABILITY =DEATH MACHINE, nothing can decrease his output Others may start with a higher output but will lose that when they get damaged and flanked. |
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Jun 29, 2016 6:22:01 GMT
but you said he can do 200 damage on MG, if lanne's assault art doesnt trigger, dobeln does more damage. Leadership + snare drums/I forgot how the skill was called = immortal death machina, nothing can decrease his output, if I surround Döbeln with some horses and damage him with some artillery he is done. Lannes keeps the same output and will wipe all units out. |
|
|
|
Post by Torvesta on Jun 29, 2016 6:25:22 GMT
but why would you make yourself surrounded, cav generals benefit more from leadership than infantry. If you consider the history, shouldn't Napoleon be on the top of your list? Surely he is better than Lannes
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Jun 29, 2016 6:45:27 GMT
but why would you make yourself surrounded, cav generals benefit more from leadership than infantry. If you consider the history, shouldn't Napoleon be on the top of your list? Surely he is better than Lannes I hate Napoleon. (as EW4 general) |
|
|
|
Post by Torvesta on Jun 29, 2016 7:11:27 GMT
He is terrible in the game because of his unfocused skills but historically, he was the greatest general, better than lannes
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Jun 29, 2016 9:33:13 GMT
He is terrible in the game because of his unfocused skills but historically, he was the greatest general, better than lannes Maybe, he has shown really brilliant strategy, but he also was the man behind the invasion of Russia yknow. |
|
|
|
Post by Torvesta on Jun 29, 2016 13:50:53 GMT
He deserves to be the strongest general.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mao Ze Dong on Jul 6, 2016 16:47:52 GMT
He deserves to be the strongest general. I know right.. He is nerfed way too much |
|
, leadership ftw 
