|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 12, 2016 11:04:29 GMT
If this many people have left I don't think it's worth dragging this war on any longer. It's disappointing but at least it didn't end in salt. I'm sorry The Light Bringer but if this many people have left I don't think its worth it. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2016 11:24:21 GMT
If this many people have left I don't think it's worth dragging this war on any longer. It's disappointing but at least it didn't end in salt. I'm sorry The Light Bringer but if this many people have left I don't think its worth it. Well actually nobody except bismarck (who was banned) has completely left yet, if we get people active this may go on, but only then... |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 12, 2016 11:58:47 GMT
If this many people have left I don't think it's worth dragging this war on any longer. It's disappointing but at least it didn't end in salt. I'm sorry The Light Bringer but if this many people have left I don't think its worth it. it was just four people in the end anyway. But this was the first one that didn't end in salt  (it actually had no salt) |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 12, 2016 12:03:01 GMT
If this many people have left I don't think it's worth dragging this war on any longer. It's disappointing but at least it didn't end in salt. I'm sorry The Light Bringer but if this many people have left I don't think its worth it. it was just four people in the end anyway. But this was the first one that didn't end in salt (it actually had no salt) Aside from some disputes but I feel everyone handled that every well, The Light Bringer did a pretty good job trying to fix the issues that arose and everyone seemed to keep their calm. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2016 12:24:10 GMT
it was just four people in the end anyway. But this was the first one that didn't end in salt (it actually had no salt) Aside from some disputes but I feel everyone handled that every well, The Light Bringer did a pretty good job trying to fix the issues that arose and everyone seemed to keep their calm. Yes, I think if all of us agree and nobody comes online, we shall consider this war a tie between all sides and ended with a peace declaration, it will become official in 24h Also I think I know why this ended, I'm not in RP leader group  |
|
|
|
Post by Haelicon on Aug 12, 2016 14:22:13 GMT
Wait? It's done?
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Aug 12, 2016 14:32:19 GMT
What if in the future, a TW has a short term goal and when it is met with satisfaction, the players may vote to end the war at that point (to make things end properly, you know?) Or... the players really wants to continue, then the GM and the players decides on what a new short term goal is set at (the GM has ultimately the veto power, of course) and the TW continues to the second short-term goalpost and a new vote comes up at that point. I think it helps people having a satisfying end but doesn't have to be a very huge and long, dragged out TW to satisfy everyone. Plus at those times of voting, if a player needs to step out or a new player wants to join, it would be a perfect time to make a swap or something. Tagging Ivan Kolev, Napoleon Bonaparte, Von Bismarck jr, and António Salazar |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 12, 2016 15:06:31 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Aug 12, 2016 15:09:21 GMT
What do you guys think of this short-term idea to make TWs better in the future?
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Aug 12, 2016 15:12:41 GMT
Ehm? So this tw is over? And i agrer with Desophaeus, going to make a poll about it now |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2016 15:18:20 GMT
Well if few guys came active we could continue, but doesn't look its gonna happen...
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Aug 12, 2016 15:20:17 GMT
A poll perhaps?
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Aug 12, 2016 15:23:27 GMT
It doesn't have to be set up now for this TW, it can be prepared in advance for TW13. Or we could experiment with this in TW12 now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 12, 2016 15:45:13 GMT
What if in the future, a TW has a short term goal and when it is met with satisfaction, the players may vote to end the war at that point (to make things end properly, you know?) Or... the players really wants to continue, then the GM and the players decides on what a new short term goal is set at (the GM has ultimately the veto power, of course) and the TW continues to the second short-term goalpost and a new vote comes up at that point. I think it helps people having a satisfying end but doesn't have to be a very huge and long, dragged out TW to satisfy everyone. Plus at those times of voting, if a player needs to step out or a new player wants to join, it would be a perfect time to make a swap or something. Tagging Ivan Kolev, Napoleon Bonaparte, Von Bismarck jr, and António Salazar did something similar in TW10, where we had to take one city instead of fighting a war of annihilation |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2016 15:49:09 GMT
What if in the future, a TW has a short term goal and when it is met with satisfaction, the players may vote to end the war at that point (to make things end properly, you know?) Or... the players really wants to continue, then the GM and the players decides on what a new short term goal is set at (the GM has ultimately the veto power, of course) and the TW continues to the second short-term goalpost and a new vote comes up at that point. I think it helps people having a satisfying end but doesn't have to be a very huge and long, dragged out TW to satisfy everyone. Plus at those times of voting, if a player needs to step out or a new player wants to join, it would be a perfect time to make a swap or something. Tagging Ivan Kolev, Napoleon Bonaparte, Von Bismarck jr, and António Salazar did something similar in TW10, where we had to take one city instead of fighting a war of annihilation You are next |
|
(it actually had no salt)
