|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 20:31:09 GMT
Actually Itagaki is not that bad Yeah... but Vatutin. Way cheaper. Given a choice, who would you choose? Also, his IRL track record. Actually Itagaki is good enough for campaign and most conquests, so he is good enough to replace vatutin |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 4, 2016 20:32:26 GMT
Yeah... but Vatutin. Way cheaper. Given a choice, who would you choose? Also, his IRL track record. Actually Itagaki is good enough for campaign and most conquests, so he is good enough to replace vatutin But Vatutin is stronger, with lvl 4 tide |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 4, 2016 20:33:56 GMT
Yeah... but Vatutin. Way cheaper. Given a choice, who would you choose? Also, his IRL track record. Actually Itagaki is good enough for campaign and most conquests, so he is good enough to replace vatutin Compared to what else is there in Asia, yes. COmpared to Mr. Madman, no. Look at the guide of Erich von Manstein. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 20:37:03 GMT
Actually Itagaki is good enough for campaign and most conquests, so he is good enough to replace vatutin But Vatutin is stronger, with lvl 4 tide I did test few times, and with my endgame tech vatutin died like graziani against Itagaki |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 20:38:00 GMT
Actually Itagaki is good enough for campaign and most conquests, so he is good enough to replace vatutin Compared to what else is there in Asia, yes. COmpared to Mr. Madman, no. Look at the guide of Erich von Manstein. I made a test, it's somewhere in one of these boards. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 4, 2016 20:38:28 GMT
But Vatutin is stronger, with lvl 4 tide I did test few times, and with my endgame tech vatutin died like graziani against Itagaki That's because of supply, and in normal combat Vatutin fares better |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 20:42:55 GMT
I did test few times, and with my endgame tech vatutin died like graziani against Itagaki That's because of supply, and in normal combat Vatutin fares better I know that it was because of supply, and he is good enough to replace Vatutin, especially on supertank if you want alternatives |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 4, 2016 20:44:15 GMT
That's because of supply, and in normal combat Vatutin fares better I know that it was because of supply, and he is good enough to replace Vatutin, especially on supertank if you want alternatives He is good enough for #3 or #4 tank slot, unlike Graziani or Rokkossovsky |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 20:45:05 GMT
I know that it was because of supply, and he is good enough to replace Vatutin, especially on supertank if you want alternatives He is good enough for #3 or #4 tank slot, unlike Graziani or Rokkossovsky Yep, that's what I'm saying |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Aug 5, 2016 1:00:27 GMT
No one wins Rommel for No.3 tank slot though. And with that test The Light Bringer I remember you said your tank tech is maxed out? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 5, 2016 2:26:15 GMT
No one wins Rommel for No.3 tank slot though. And with that test The Light Bringer I remember you said your tank tech is maxed out? Rommel is a pro unless you can't save for ****. Itagaki qualifies for #4 or #5 |
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Aug 5, 2016 4:59:06 GMT
Here's my opinion about Montgomery...
- At first, he's suck; weak skills, expensive
- Only starts with high rank. Since other can be promoted, this is just to save some medals (well, already paid a lot in the first place).
But after I find myself playing a lot of 50/60 conquests
- I prefer Supply skill to other skills by a large margin because however strong your generals are, they will be crippled with nukes in a few rounds.
- Strong general such as Guderian or Patton would be not so useful when they are near dead.
- That's when Montgomery did pop into my head. Since AI rarely nuke injured general, Lv 4 Supply allow the nuked general to be able to get back in action.
- What I normally do is to put a general w lv4 supply on super tank in a city. He'll be nuked in no time. With the defense from the city, he will not be almost dead but injured enough to not lure another nuke.
- This means in 50/60 era, I can keep Montgomery active in the front line until the end of conquest.
- So now, Montgomery is my top pick for my tank generals since I mostly play 50/60 conquests.
- Well, I did not buy Montgomery since I decided to spend the medals on another eye-covered dude. But if I had not build my eye-covered dude, I would have bought Montgomery.
PS. In 50/60 era, I usually pick my third eye-covered dude (2* tank, supply4, plain2, explosive2) over Guderian for commanding super tank for the reason stated above.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2016 9:35:05 GMT
Here's my opinion about Montgomery... - At first, he's suck; weak skills, expensive - Only starts with high rank. Since other can be promoted, this is just to save some medals (well, already paid a lot in the first place). But after I find myself playing a lot of 50/60 conquests - I prefer Supply skill to other skills by a large margin because however strong your generals are, they will be crippled with nukes in a few rounds. - Strong general such as Guderian or Patton would be not so useful when they are near dead. - That's when Montgomery did pop into my head. Since AI rarely nuke injured general, Lv 4 Supply allow the nuked general to be able to get back in action. - What I normally do is to put a general w lv4 supply on super tank in a city. He'll be nuked in no time. With the defense from the city, he will not be almost dead but injured enough to not lure another nuke. - This means in 50/60 era, I can keep Montgomery active in the front line until the end of conquest. - So now, Montgomery is my top pick for my tank generals since I mostly play 50/60 conquests. - Well, I did not buy Montgomery since I decided to spend the medals on another eye-covered dude. But if I had not build my eye-covered dude, I would have bought Montgomery. PS. In 50/60 era, I usually pick my third eye-covered dude (2* tank, supply4, plain2, explosive2) over Guderian for commanding super tank for the reason stated above. And Itagaki is the same story because of supply. |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Aug 5, 2016 9:40:21 GMT
Even with that i would say itagaki>montgommery sonce itagaki also has explosives which fit him more than montgommery on conquest. Especially for his price
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2016 12:43:55 GMT
Even with that i would say itagaki>montgommery sonce itagaki also has explosives which fit him more than montgommery on conquest. Especially for his price Itagaki is in my top 4 tank generals. |
|
