|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jul 27, 2016 4:28:32 GMT
EW5: Austro-Prussian War Rule: No AC and MG. Austria: Maria+ Archduke C.+ Radetzky+ Johann I+ Merveldt+ Archduke J.+ Klenau+ Wurmser+ Leiberich+ Blasius+ Bubna+ Weyrother+ Heinrich XV+ Hotze+ Melas+ Quosdanovih+ Rosenberg+ Vecsey+ Davidovich+ Keinmayer+ Kollowrat+ Latour+ Lusignan. Prussia: Blucher+ Scharnhorst+ Bulow+ Yorck+ Wilhelm III+ Clausewitz+ Kleist+ L'Estocq+ Dornberg. Who should win? I bet Austria!  But if you use the generals from 1939 onward, Germany/Prussia completely crushes Austria, not that many quality Austrian generals in the more modern era. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Jul 27, 2016 15:15:42 GMT
EW5: Austro-Prussian War Rule: No AC and MG. Austria: Maria+ Archduke C.+ Radetzky+ Johann I+ Merveldt+ Archduke J.+ Klenau+ Wurmser+ Leiberich+ Blasius+ Bubna+ Weyrother+ Heinrich XV+ Hotze+ Melas+ Quosdanovih+ Rosenberg+ Vecsey+ Davidovich+ Keinmayer+ Kollowrat+ Latour+ Lusignan. Prussia: Blucher+ Scharnhorst+ Bulow+ Yorck+ Wilhelm III+ Clausewitz+ Kleist+ L'Estocq+ Dornberg. Who should win? I bet Austria! But if you use the generals from 1939 onward, Germany/Prussia completely crushes Austria, not that many quality Austrian generals in the more modern era. Guderian and Erich von Manstein will get every enemy standing rekt. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jul 27, 2016 15:20:37 GMT
But if you use the generals from 1939 onward, Germany/Prussia completely crushes Austria, not that many quality Austrian generals in the more modern era. Guderian and Erich von Manstein will get every enemy standing rekt. In-game, Goring will too. Not in reality though |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2016 15:21:35 GMT
In-game, Goring will too. Not in reality though Göring was a horrible person. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jul 27, 2016 15:23:57 GMT
In-game, Goring will too. Not in reality though Göring was a horrible person. And a junkie, and an imbecile |
|
|
|
Post by Der Kaiserreich on Jul 27, 2016 21:52:22 GMT
Göring was a horrible person. And a junkie, and an imbecile #HateGöring |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jul 27, 2016 22:04:42 GMT
*cough* moving on... I believe we can safely say that the 1960 Conquest isn't accurate at all. There we go.  |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jul 27, 2016 22:33:14 GMT
*cough* moving on... I believe we can safely say that the 1960 Conquest isn't accurate at all. There we go. It's not inaccurate, it's an alternate timeline that forked 65 million years ago, when the asteroid caused Brazil to somehow shift north |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2016 22:35:58 GMT
*cough* moving on... I believe we can safely say that the 1960 Conquest isn't accurate at all. There we go. It's not inaccurate, it's an alternate timeline that forked 65 million years ago, when the asteroid caused Brazil to somehow shift north And caused countries that wouldn't care to care. |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jul 27, 2016 23:14:43 GMT
It's not inaccurate, it's an alternate timeline that forked 65 million years ago, when the asteroid caused Brazil to somehow shift north And caused countries that wouldn't care to care. I suppose you two are right, how else it can be?! All of this bizarre "history"! |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jul 27, 2016 23:16:25 GMT
And caused countries that wouldn't care to care. I suppose you two are right, how else it can be?! All of this bizarre "history"! And the existence of the magical West Ponit, or MAnteuffel not spending 1960 in his 2-year jail sentence |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2016 23:17:23 GMT
And caused countries that wouldn't care to care. I suppose you two are right, how else it can be?! All of this bizarre "history"! And they left some crazy history out too. Like the Vietnam War. What even happened to Vietnam? I'd rather them not have Australia then Vietnam. |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jul 27, 2016 23:18:46 GMT
I suppose you two are right, how else it can be?! All of this bizarre "history"! And they left some crazy history out too. Like the Vietnam War. What even happened to Vietnam? I'd rather them not have Australia then Vietnam. But they did leave out half of Australia!  It's gone into the mysterious void! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2016 23:19:29 GMT
I suppose you two are right, how else it can be?! All of this bizarre "history"! And the existence of the magical West Ponit, or MAnteuffel not spending 1960 in his 2-year jail sentence Not to mention how @coolguy14 was retired by then. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2016 23:20:23 GMT
And they left some crazy history out too. Like the Vietnam War. What even happened to Vietnam? I'd rather them not have Australia then Vietnam. But they did leave out half of Australia! It's gone into the mysterious void! Same with Scandinavia, Africa, and South America. |
|
It's gone into the mysterious void!
