|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 4, 2016 17:17:11 GMT
True. That's also a pretty neat accomplishment That was one of hardest conquests in wc3 But not as hard as India 1975 |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 17:17:54 GMT
Or my USSR 1975  True. That's also a pretty neat accomplishment Oh and don't forget my Japan (50/60?) no gen, no ion guide |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 4, 2016 17:19:01 GMT
True. That's also a pretty neat accomplishment Oh and don't forget my Japan (50/60?) no gen, no ion guide That's huge too. Japan normally dies FAST |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 17:19:18 GMT
That was one of hardest conquests in wc3 But not as hard as India 1975 That one was interesting to do, China was even harder there, but nobody does China |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 4, 2016 17:20:40 GMT
But not as hard as India 1975 That one was interesting to do, China was even harder there, but nobody does China is actually doing PRC1950 right now |
|
|
|
Post by Ivan Kolev on Aug 4, 2016 17:21:35 GMT
I dont think we should have it be so that guides and such count as ten or thirty posts, because then you get into the terrible situation whee you need to determine how many posts one post counts as, and that could end up in eventual conflict. For example, someone makes a really detailed, really good, really awesome guide to Iraq 1975. Okay, they get 30 posts, the max, lets say. Then lets say someone makes a really awesome, detailed guide for GB 1815, but lets say he only gets 20 posts. Then the guy who made the GB guide is like "well, wait, he got 30 posts and I only got 20 posts? What is this?" and then goes on to complain about it, the guy who made the Iraq guide might fight back, etc. etc. etc., BAD SCENE.
Posts=Posts after all, not Post=Post
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 17:24:14 GMT
I dont think we should have it be so that guides and such count as ten or thirty posts, because then you get into the terrible situation whee you need to determine how many posts one post counts as, and that could end up in eventual conflict. For example, someone makes a really detailed, really good, really awesome guide to Iraq 1975. Okay, they get 30 posts, the max, lets say. Then lets say someone makes a really awesome, detailed guide for GB 1815, but lets say he only gets 20 posts. Then the guy who made the GB guide is like "well, wait, he got 30 posts and I only got 20 posts? What is this?" and then goes on to complain about it, the guy who made the Iraq guide might fight back, etc. etc. etc., BAD SCENE. Posts=Posts after all, not Post=PostThat is why saltin dropped that idea |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 17:24:51 GMT
That one was interesting to do, China was even harder there, but nobody does China is actually doing PRC1950 right now I was talking more of 1975 |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Aug 5, 2016 9:37:36 GMT
What a betrayal... (anyone remembers MARS?)  |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 5, 2016 9:56:26 GMT
What a betrayal... (anyone remembers MARS?) TWs? |
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Aug 5, 2016 10:04:16 GMT
What a betrayal... (anyone remembers MARS?) Yep I totally remember this. It was the medieval TW. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 5, 2016 10:05:16 GMT
What a betrayal... (anyone remembers MARS?) Yep I totally remember this. It was the medieval TW. and I totally don't as I was continuously being blitzed by Talleyrand. Netherfreek am I in the thread? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2016 10:11:18 GMT
That's team chat in tw7, we had the same idea when we fought there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 5, 2016 10:20:30 GMT
That's team chat in tw7, we had the same idea when we fought there. am I in that thread? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2016 10:24:42 GMT
That's team chat in tw7, we had the same idea when we fought there. am I in that thread? Honestly no idea, whose team chat it is... |
|
