|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 1, 2016 16:28:09 GMT
st thing Guys I played EW 4 for a looooong time but i never found out the best way to defeat them or even if they are that useful because they are expensive and the coastal forts just destroy them and that is just a waste but the big thing is that they are limited on water.
2nd I dont know when you step lets say a desert 5% inf -5% cav art so is it worse defence or better on inf or I deal bigger damage
3rd Are rivers just hinderances because they make you slower but when I plat conquest as the UK in America 1775 there are some ships stuck in lakes and there are rivers so is there a hidden way to transport ships via rivers
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 1, 2016 16:33:59 GMT
Tito, You can't transport ships via rivers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 1, 2016 16:43:44 GMT
And what about a navy should I buy one oe are they just a waste of money
And still if it shows -5 inf is it that I have better defence or worse or I have a weaker attack as infantry I dont get the firests and hills and deserts
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 1, 2016 16:56:17 GMT
The -x% is a deduction in the attack (if a cav unit attacks a unit on a hex with -x% cav, it will deal less damage
|
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 1, 2016 17:26:28 GMT
What is the best way to defeat a navy ship I played 1775 UK three ships were stuck in lakes but two ships were in the lakes but they are no match against the russian and the other one was with a general in the antlantic great my plan is to defeat the United States and support jessen and portugal then crush the Dutch Poles And French I suck on naval battles so the Russians are a hard nutand Navy waste of supplies ? BTW If an unit is low on health should I just let it die
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 1, 2016 17:49:41 GMT
What is the best way to defeat a navy ship I played 1775 UK three ships were stuck in lakes but two ships were in the lakes but they are no match against the russian and the other one was with a general in the antlantic great my plan is to defeat the United States and support jessen and portugal then crush the Dutch Poles And French I suck on naval battles so the Russians are a hard nutand Navy waste of supplies ? BTW If an unit is low on health should I just let it die TO defeat enemy ships, spam coastal forts if they're near your land, and privateers if they're far. Dying units that aren't generals should be used in suicide charges routinely, both sea and land. And save ships for near the end on non-rushing conquest |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 1, 2016 18:03:09 GMT
What is the best way to defeat a navy ship I played 1775 UK three ships were stuck in lakes but two ships were in the lakes but they are no match against the russian and the other one was with a general in the antlantic great my plan is to defeat the United States and support jessen and portugal then crush the Dutch Poles And French I suck on naval battles so the Russians are a hard nutand Navy waste of supplies ? BTW If an unit is low on health should I just let it die TO defeat enemy ships, spam coastal forts if they're near your land, and privateers if they're far. Dying units that aren't generals should be used in suicide charges routinely, both sea and land. And save ships for near the end on non-rushing conquest Is it worth that Troops heal in Cities because wgn I played a prussian conquest I put damaged forces even Millita in Berlin (Blucher was a strong general he didnt need to heal) Let's say Idk Andrade (1lvl ranks) he fights a short time but he is almost dead is it really worth him healing if he is going to lose a lot of HP fast |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 1, 2016 18:04:14 GMT
TO defeat enemy ships, spam coastal forts if they're near your land, and privateers if they're far. Dying units that aren't generals should be used in suicide charges routinely, both sea and land. And save ships for near the end on non-rushing conquest Is it worth that Troops heal in Cities because wgn I played a prussian conquest I put damaged forces even Millita in Berlin (Blucher was a strong general he didnt need to heal) Let's say Idk Andrade (1lvl ranks) he fights a short time but he is almost dead is it really worth him healing if he is going to lose a lot of HP fast A good general (not Andrade) deals so much better output that he is worth preserving for the next time he is needed |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 1, 2016 18:15:40 GMT
Is it worth that Troops heal in Cities because wgn I played a prussian conquest I put damaged forces even Millita in Berlin (Blucher was a strong general he didnt need to heal) Let's say Idk Andrade (1lvl ranks) he fights a short time but he is almost dead is it really worth him healing if he is going to lose a lot of HP fast A good general (not Andrade) deals so much better output that he is worth preserving for the next time he is needed Andrade was the first General that came to my mind |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 6, 2016 13:24:57 GMT
The -x% is a deduction in the attack (if a cav unit attacks a unit on a hex with -x% cav, it will deal less damage So what is the point of a ttench if it says +20 |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 6, 2016 15:18:08 GMT
The -x% is a deduction in the attack (if a cav unit attacks a unit on a hex with -x% cav, it will deal less damage So what is the point of a ttench if it says +20 No, it says -20% |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 6, 2016 16:07:40 GMT
So what is the point of a ttench if it says +20 No, it says -20% When the trench is buikt it says 20 % inf If I build a fence it sats 10 % inf -25% cav And bunker 10 % inf and -30% Art |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 6, 2016 16:11:20 GMT
It is intended to be -20%
|
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 6, 2016 16:13:24 GMT
It is intended to be -20% So if it says 20 % uts the opposite |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 6, 2016 16:15:26 GMT
It is intended to be -20% So if it says 20 % uts the opposite Typo by Easytech? |
|
