|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 13, 2016 17:02:51 GMT
Movement on land is as it was in TW10.
Battles required to win a province are and remain 3
The Picard formula is used for calculating dice roll, it is: 7+(DefenderBP-attackerBP)/attackerBP×5
At that dice roll, both take 30% casualties. Any 1 dice roll deviation makes a 5% deviation in casualties.
Any number of troops can cross the seas, assuming it is allowed by techs.
Anything I missed?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 13, 2016 17:19:40 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2016 18:08:59 GMT
Movement on land is as it was in TW10. Battles required to win a province are and remain 3 The Picard formula is used for calculating dice roll, it is: 7+(DefenderBP-attackerBP)/attackerBP×5 At that dice roll, both take 30% casualties. Any 1 dice roll deviation makes a 5% deviation in casualties. Any number of troops can cross the seas, assuming it is allowed by techs. Anything I missed? And taking country remains 3 phases as minimum? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 13, 2016 18:17:28 GMT
Movement on land is as it was in TW10. Battles required to win a province are and remain 3 The Picard formula is used for calculating dice roll, it is: 7+(DefenderBP-attackerBP)/attackerBP×5 At that dice roll, both take 30% casualties. Any 1 dice roll deviation makes a 5% deviation in casualties. Any number of troops can cross the seas, assuming it is allowed by techs. Anything I missed? And taking country remains 3 phases as minimum? Yes, as always |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 19, 2016 3:26:00 GMT
New addition: The Persian Gulf is now considered to border the Red Sea
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 19, 2016 9:32:28 GMT
New addition: The Persian Gulf is now considered to border the Red Sea huh? So no Arab? |
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Aug 20, 2016 1:10:21 GMT
Using The Picard formula sometimes you get unit with only part of its BP left.
Unless there is special rule for them i think they should still count towards unit storage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Aug 20, 2016 2:30:52 GMT
Using The Picard formula sometimes you get unit with only part of its BP left. Unless there is special rule for them i think they should still count towards unit storage. You mean if the unit is still alive? Yes. But if it's dead along with the other casualties, then no, dead is dead. Unusable. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 22, 2016 10:03:55 GMT
Formula is killing 65 infantries in two attacks Jean-Luc Picard , need another alteration. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2016 12:02:28 GMT
Formula is killing 65 infantries in two attacks Jean-Luc Picard , need another alteration. The old one or mine, I know mine had 3 times more dices, but you could clearly see loses there... |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 22, 2016 12:29:18 GMT
Formula is killing 65 infantries in two attacks Jean-Luc Picard , need another alteration. The old one or mine, I know mine had 3 times more dices, but you could clearly see loses there... the one made by picard |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Aug 22, 2016 12:54:33 GMT
Formula is killing 65 infantries in two attacks Jean-Luc Picard , need another alteration. Out of 370, that's not bad, right? And you did apply the negative impact of sabotage on your rolls right? |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 22, 2016 14:11:31 GMT
Formula is killing 65 infantries in two attacks Jean-Luc Picard , need another alteration. Out of 370, that's not bad, right? And you did apply the negative impact of sabotage on your rolls right? its nothing for me, but we do have small countries too you know? I don't care much about it, but the formula has some issue I think? 65 in 2 battles? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 22, 2016 14:39:20 GMT
You're thinking in absolutes instead of percents. A high roll assumes a great plan that gets many killed among the enemy
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Aug 23, 2016 7:52:06 GMT
Jean-Luc Picard , On the rule that base number can be reduced to 12 if number is above 12. I have problem with losses to defending side. This example Attacking force 10bp vs defending force 100bp. Roll a 12. Win . Defending force lose 30bp Attacking force 10bp vs defending force 50bp.. Roll a 12. Win Defending force lose 15bp Larger defending force more lost. Can the losses for the defending force in such a situation be scaled in comparison to the amount of force the attacker has?
|
|
