|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 18, 2016 14:00:57 GMT
Which one is more of a tactical masterpiece- Austerlitz or Cannae? Austerlitz |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Aug 18, 2016 15:04:31 GMT
Which was more strategic Stalingrad or Kursk?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 18, 2016 15:13:24 GMT
Which was more strategic Stalingrad or Kursk? Kursk of course |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2016 16:19:36 GMT
Which was more strategic Stalingrad or Kursk? Kursk of course No, if Germans at Stalingrad striked further ≈30km was Moscow |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 18, 2016 16:27:20 GMT
Stalingrad duh?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 18, 2016 17:02:38 GMT
No, if Germans at Stalingrad striked further ≈30km was Moscow Sorry for the missunderstanding I thought he said wich one was more brilliant kursk Remeber Operation Citadel but stalingrad was just a meatgrinder bassicly like the Battle of Verdun in WW1 |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 18, 2016 17:09:09 GMT
Cannae over Austerlitz, Volgograd = Kursk.
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Aug 18, 2016 17:28:22 GMT
Which had more effect : Yorktown or Waterloo?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 18, 2016 18:21:47 GMT
Which had more effect : Yorktown or Waterloo? Texas Waterloo or Belgium Waterloo? |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Aug 18, 2016 19:26:32 GMT
If Belgian, then it's Waterloo. The best way to finally finish off Napoleon for once is a decisive loss.
Yorktown was simply a culmination of British eventually becoming more worn out year by year with a war far beyond the convenient reach of the Royal Navy. George Washington was a genuine and capable leader, and he knew that he had to avoid major confrontation and try to win through grinding attrition and outlast the redcoats.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 18, 2016 19:29:38 GMT
Is it better to be strict as Arthur Wellesley or Kinda Nice to your men so they would be loyal that is what Napoleon did but ge was too soft and the guard needed to retreat at waterloo but he actually lost becayse he gace his command to Ney
|
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 18, 2016 19:32:18 GMT
Also how could have Napoleon won at Waterloo
|
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 19, 2016 8:49:45 GMT
Which was more strategic Stalingrad or Kursk? Stalingrad was the most significant strategically but Kursk was more significant tactically. There is a difference. |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 19, 2016 10:19:51 GMT
Which was more strategic Stalingrad or Kursk? Stalingrad was the most significant strategically but Kursk was more significant tactically. There is a difference. That is what I said Kursk a brilliant plan of deffence and stalingrad a giant meatgrinder but stalingrad was won by USSR but if germans won they could get Doviet Oil aswell |
|
