|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 16, 2016 10:53:56 GMT
Since many have done this I thought maybe I should do one too?
Scenario; 2017
Countries Involved; Side 1) China. Pakistan
Side 2) India USA
Keep politics out. Only four countries battle (I think this one is the most realistic till date?).
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Aug 16, 2016 10:59:47 GMT
USA is very far away from the main point of conflict so I think side 1 has better chance due to that.
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 16, 2016 11:01:27 GMT
USA is very far away from the main point of conflict so I think side 1 has better chance due to that. USA has bases all around the world.....
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Aug 16, 2016 11:06:52 GMT
USA is very far away from the main point of conflict so I think side 1 has better chance due to that. USA has bases all around the world..... That changes it than. USA has most advance army and they will likely win in a normal battle with Pakistan and China. But I don't think they will be able to hold all the land they captured for a long time as both pakistan and china have quite a large population.
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 16, 2016 11:15:00 GMT
NUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKS
Aside from that I still think India/USA would win because of the US Air Power and technology and sound wave death beam weapons. Unfortunately I have no amusing camo for this war.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2016 11:53:13 GMT
NUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKS Aside from that I still think India/USA would win because of the US Air Power and technology and sound wave death beam weapons. Unfortunately I have no amusing camo for this war. India has pretty big and advanced army too, so if USA comes around then Pakistan and China is no match, as China has low air capabilities and low naval power, Pakistan has good inf, but they can't match USA, most likely it would be India vs China and Pakistani vs USA, if no nukes are used China is no match for long warfare as they wouldn't be capable to fight navy and air from India, as overall India and China has armies of the same size, just China has abit more armored units. USA would neutralize Pakistan very fast in this situation.
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 16, 2016 11:56:59 GMT
NUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKS Aside from that I still think India/USA would win because of the US Air Power and technology and sound wave death beam weapons. Unfortunately I have no amusing camo for this war. India has pretty big and advanced army too, so if USA comes around then Pakistan and China is no match, as China has low air capabilities and low naval power, Pakistan has good inf, but they can't match USA, most likely it would be India vs China and Pakistani vs USA, if no nukes are used China is no match for long warfare as they wouldn't be capable to fight navy and air from India, as overall India and China has armies of the same size, just China has abit more armored units. USA would neutralize Pakistan very fast in this situation. looks like you forgot all our intelligence agencies and all those Special Service Groups? Mind you? We have the 6th biggest standing army on the planet and really patriotic people in here (moderate Pakistani speaking).
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2016 11:58:55 GMT
India has pretty big and advanced army too, so if USA comes around then Pakistan and China is no match, as China has low air capabilities and low naval power, Pakistan has good inf, but they can't match USA, most likely it would be India vs China and Pakistani vs USA, if no nukes are used China is no match for long warfare as they wouldn't be capable to fight navy and air from India, as overall India and China has armies of the same size, just China has abit more armored units. USA would neutralize Pakistan very fast in this situation. looks like you forgot all our intelligence agencies and all those Special Service Groups? Mind you? We have the 6th biggest standing army on the planet and really patriotic people in here (moderate Pakistani speaking). Wait a minute, I'll add numbers in a minute
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2016 12:07:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 16, 2016 13:13:45 GMT
India has pretty big and advanced army too, so if USA comes around then Pakistan and China is no match, as China has low air capabilities and low naval power, Pakistan has good inf, but they can't match USA, most likely it would be India vs China and Pakistani vs USA, if no nukes are used China is no match for long warfare as they wouldn't be capable to fight navy and air from India, as overall India and China has armies of the same size, just China has abit more armored units. USA would neutralize Pakistan very fast in this situation. looks like you forgot all our intelligence agencies and all those Special Service Groups? Mind you? We have the 6th biggest standing army on the planet and really patriotic people in here (moderate Pakistani speaking). I remembered the SSG and ISI!
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 16, 2016 13:25:31 GMT
looks like you forgot all our intelligence agencies and all those Special Service Groups? Mind you? We have the 6th biggest standing army on the planet and really patriotic people in here (moderate Pakistani speaking). I remembered the SSG and ISI! nice
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Aug 17, 2016 6:22:47 GMT
Honestly, if Pakistan and "People's Republic" of China does threaten nuclear warfare, none of the infantry or armored divisions matter whatsoever. But let's say if no such warhead has denoated, Pakistan would dig into their mountains and form a brutal resistance in their own homeland but is unable to press forward outside their borders very well. India and China would be isolated from each other by the Himalayan mountains. Most of the fighting would be done between India and Pakistan on their border, and the South China Sea for China. Of course, India/USA would win with near 99% certainty in the naval aspect of this war.
Stalemate - China can't invade anyone with their ships sunk, but it's not a good idea to invade China. Pakistani contained to their mountains but might be suffering massive casualties from bunker buster missles designed to inflict massive damage to underground bunkers. The Pakistani will continue to defend every speck of sand in their homeland with blood though.
So, pretty much, a stalemate but nukes dicates who wins (or more of who loses the less? Lol).
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Aug 17, 2016 7:13:51 GMT
Well I think that the USA teamed with any country (within reason) would win these matchups. Unless it's something like China and Russia
|
|
|
Post by Yi Sun Sin on Aug 17, 2016 8:23:10 GMT
But aren't naval powers ( excluding aircraft carriers) useless if the enemy doesn't decide to fight in the sea. And China makes like half of the worlds stuff. My I pad I'm using is made in China , the t shirt I'm wearing is made in China etc. if China decided shut down the factories, I think it would be not just a big blow to the us but the world.
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Aug 17, 2016 8:25:57 GMT
But aren't naval powers ( excluding aircraft carriers) useless if the enemy doesn't decide to fight in the sea. And China makes like half of the worlds stuff. My I pad I'm using is made in China , the t shirt I'm wearing is made in China etc. if China decided shut down the factories, I think it would be not just a big blow to the us but the world. That would destroy China's economy. With no export of goods there is no import of money. That would lose them the war before it starts
|
|