|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2016 20:58:35 GMT
Australia: For every conquest you can bomb your way to Port Moresby and Darwin through paratrooping. In '39 watch out for Brisbane, usually you can generate carriers by capturing Hawaii to stop him.
Canada: Honestly I'm slightly surprised you need help conquering Canada. If you actually need help with Canada, reply below and I'll add it.
England: For the majority of all conquests, London will be used as a major strategic-bombing source. To dismantle the UK, simply take out London and the UK can't fight back.
France:
1939 = Go for Paris as it is the only source of economy. Avoid the Maginot Line.
1943 = Avoid their generals and capture their one city, destroying them.
1950/60 = Leon is the only nuclear facility. Destroy it to stop nukes.
Germany: Almost always, Germany will produce loads of generals. Capture their cities before they can. Be quick!
India: The strategy is the same as France 1939. Go for New Delhi. They don't have any other armored unit producing facilities.
Italy: The strategy is the same as France 1939. Go for Rome. This will prevent them from producing more units.
Japan:
1939/43 = This version of Japan likes to make loads of paratroopers. Take their oil sources and you'll cripple this principle and their navy too.
1950/60 = Both their oil production and economy are suffering. Take those, and you'll turn them into a nation not ready for military use.
Poland: Just follow the 1939 France strategy. Take Warsaw and your good.
PRC: The PRC likes making nukes. Take as many cities as possible to prevent them. Stealing nuclear facilities is also a huge bonus.
ROC: Same strategy as Germany.
Romania: Same strategy as France 1939. Take Bucharest
Spain: Same strategy as France 1939. Take Madrid.
Sweden: I must turn your attention to the tutorials found under campaign mode. There you can learn how to play this game.
Turkey: Same strategy as 1939 France. Take Ankara.
USA: Take any large cities. The USA succeeds because of economy.
In 1939/43, you will usually make a tank train to get to them. In 1950/60, take Alaska (easiest way) and nuke your way to the big cities.
USSR:
1939/43 = Same strategy as Germany.
1950/60 = Same strategy as PRC.
For further strategic information, reply below. Think you have a better strategy than one up here or think I missed something? You can also reply below.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2016 21:08:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 21, 2016 22:11:08 GMT
Romanian cap is Bucuresti (Romanian) or Bucharest (English).
Sweden, to put it more clearly: You do know they have no Gens and only 1 city, no? How did you even get to 1950?
Canadia and US should be conquerorered together. 1939/43 tank train/mass inf from 1 coast to the other, 1950/60/75 nuke/para. Canadans only have 2 gens and usually finish spawning and dying before you get there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2016 22:22:09 GMT
Romanian cap is Bucuresti (Romanian) or Bucharest (English). Sweden, to put it more clearly: You do know they have no Gens and only 1 city, no? How did you even get to 1950? Canadia and US should be conquerorered together. 1939/43 tank train/mass inf from 1 coast to the other, 1950/60/75 nuke/para. Canadans only have 2 gens and usually finish spawning and dying before you get there. I included Sweden because they're two star in 1950. My strategy for their defeat... it makes since. |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 21, 2016 22:28:55 GMT
Romanian cap is Bucuresti (Romanian) or Bucharest (English). Sweden, to put it more clearly: You do know they have no Gens and only 1 city, no? How did you even get to 1950? Canadia and US should be conquerorered together. 1939/43 tank train/mass inf from 1 coast to the other, 1950/60/75 nuke/para. Canadans only have 2 gens and usually finish spawning and dying before you get there. I included Sweden because they're two star in 1950. My strategy for their defeat... it makes since. No, that was intended for the guys who couldn't understand your strat. It would be amazing to see a person to play for that long that 1950 is unocked yet still has no idea about the basic strat. I mean, I got past Kursk when 1950 was unlocked. |
|
|
|
Post by cardbattler on Sept 6, 2016 0:44:05 GMT
For USSR in 1939/1943, one strategy for countries to the east (Japan, and Thailand) is to "backdoor" them, with squads of motorized infantry attacking Moscow when USSR is busy in central Europe.
This is because you usually won't be able to stop them spawning generals anyway so flanking them sounds better.
|
|
|
|
Post by cardbattler on Sept 6, 2016 9:57:46 GMT
Also, for countries with isolated small cities (e.g. that one city north of Canada, Novosibirsk in Siberia, a British Arabian city, Hawaii (and Midway), Lhasa (Tibet) and Dihua (Sinkiang), African cities), make sure to deploy a group of units to take them out as you proceed on their main base.
|
|
|
|
Post by Amatsukaze on Sept 8, 2016 8:13:16 GMT
For USSR in 1939/1943, one strategy for countries to the east (Japan, and Thailand) is to "backdoor" them, with squads of motorized infantry attacking Moscow when USSR is busy in central Europe. This is because you usually won't be able to stop them spawning generals anyway so flanking them sounds better. I'm using some Armored Car too in this case 0u0 |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Sept 9, 2016 1:14:40 GMT
For USSR in 1939/1943, one strategy for countries to the east (Japan, and Thailand) is to "backdoor" them, with squads of motorized infantry attacking Moscow when USSR is busy in central Europe. This is because you usually won't be able to stop them spawning generals anyway so flanking them sounds better. I want to add to this: If you aren't a country in the east, and you must face Russia from the west, don't freak out. The southern flank of Russia is softer than head on in the middle. Think of modern-day Ukraine plus Romania and Stalingrad. This entire area surrounding the northern edge of Black Sea is pretty soft once the first one or two generals are gone. USSR tend to spawn a lot more from Kiev and up to Moscow, but almost nothing south of that, maybe one single light infantry or none. It would be extremely rare to even see one boat produced by the Russian docks in any era too. Poland is a major battlefield, it's best to stay away from it in most situations (unless you have a large group of very powerful generals clustered together in a fast blitzkrieg tactical group). I normally take the central Europe after I manage to dominate the airfield network of cities in the European theater overall. |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Sept 9, 2016 1:25:03 GMT
For USSR in 1939/1943, one strategy for countries to the east (Japan, and Thailand) is to "backdoor" them, with squads of motorized infantry attacking Moscow when USSR is busy in central Europe. This is because you usually won't be able to stop them spawning generals anyway so flanking them sounds better. I want to add to this: If you aren't a country in the east, and you must face Russia from the west, don't freak out. The southern flank of Russia is softer than head on in the middle. Think of modern-day Ukraine plus Romania and Stalingrad. This entire area surrounding the northern edge of Black Sea is pretty soft once the first one or two generals are gone. USSR tend to spawn a lot more from Kiev and up to Moscow, but almost nothing south of that, maybe one single light infantry or none. It would be extremely rare to even see one boat produced by the Russian docks in any era too. Poland is a major battlefield, it's best to stay away from it in most situations (unless you have a large group of very powerful generals clustered together in a fast blitzkrieg tactical group). I normally take the central Europe after I manage to dominate the airfield network of cities in the European theater overall. Agreed. I usually take on USSR along the Finland-Minsk or Kyev-Volgograd (or Kiev-Stalingrad) Axis, then head to Moskva. Then take on the gens by surgically striking them. Especially in 39/43, where the furtherest city is Yekatrinburg. |
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on Sept 13, 2016 15:04:07 GMT
Not sure if it can be widely used, but in 1939 for Egypt worked fine such strategy: I didn't attack Adolf before he have sent his generals to UK/lost fighting with Stalin. Before that I took care for Italy, during that time Adolf lost most of his generals, and it was no problems to attack him.
Very nice works blitzkrieg strategy, like you proceed forward as fast as you can capturing airports and don't care too much for other cities if don't have money for that (sure you have to beat all armies around captured cities so not to lose them). And these cities can be captured later, as anyway enemies will not be able to do anything significant without major cities, and you will be able to capture them very quickly when have enough money for bombing or launching paratroopers. Possibly these cities can be taken by slow forces, which go slower than you capture cities.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Sept 13, 2016 16:09:35 GMT
For USSR in 1939/1943, one strategy for countries to the east (Japan, and Thailand) is to "backdoor" them, with squads of motorized infantry attacking Moscow when USSR is busy in central Europe. This is because you usually won't be able to stop them spawning generals anyway so flanking them sounds better. I want to add to this: If you aren't a country in the east, and you must face Russia from the west, don't freak out. The southern flank of Russia is softer than head on in the middle. Think of modern-day Ukraine plus Romania and Stalingrad. This entire area surrounding the northern edge of Black Sea is pretty soft once the first one or two generals are gone. USSR tend to spawn a lot more from Kiev and up to Moscow, but almost nothing south of that, maybe one single light infantry or none. It would be extremely rare to even see one boat produced by the Russian docks in any era too. Poland is a major battlefield, it's best to stay away from it in most situations (unless you have a large group of very powerful generals clustered together in a fast blitzkrieg tactical group). I normally take the central Europe after I manage to dominate the airfield network of cities in the European theater overall. In cold war era if you kill Bagramyan and Konev then the southern Russian offensive is destroyed. Germany is the main battlefield also, especially Berlin. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2016 17:15:21 GMT
I'd like to remind everyone that none of these strategies are perfect. Every one of these strategies is focusing on the weaknesses of specific countries. Do certain countries perform better at these strategies than others? Yes, they do, so I had to focus on major weaknesses. Will I eventually focus on minor weaknesses? It could happen, but right now I'm focusing on my country analysis guide.
|
|
