|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 28, 2016 15:41:56 GMT
Now in this Serie we are going to talk Which war was something.
In the first Episode is about Which War was easiest won? With War I mean Battle not a full war
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 28, 2016 16:14:11 GMT
Battle of Zanzibar, the only battle of the Anglo-Zanzibar war, which ended after 38-45 minutes.
|
|
|
|
Post by polandballfan on Aug 28, 2016 23:11:09 GMT
Battle of Zanzibar, the only battle of the Anglo-Zanzibar war, which ended after 38-45 minutes. Surrendered like French |
|
|
|
Post by Franz von Hipper on Aug 29, 2016 2:31:56 GMT
Battle of Zanzibar, the only battle of the Anglo-Zanzibar war, which ended after 38-45 minutes. Surrendered like French That was uncalled for. Plus this joke is old and based on not much tbh |
|
|
|
Post by Franz von Hipper on Aug 29, 2016 2:33:18 GMT
Battle of Zanzibar, the only battle of the Anglo-Zanzibar war, which ended after 38-45 minutes. Cant disagree with Zanzibar, it was a walk in the park for the British |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 29, 2016 2:40:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Franz von Hipper on Aug 29, 2016 2:45:05 GMT
Exactly what I meant, plus if the french surrendered during ww1 (which they didn't, they bravely fought), most of Europe would have been under the German Empire |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 29, 2016 2:47:28 GMT
Exactly what I meant, plus if the french surrendered during ww1 (which they didn't, they bravely fought), most of Europe would have been under the German Empire Coming from EU4, France is something to be feared, not laughed at.  See? The Big Blue Blob strikes once again. |
|
|
|
Post by polandballfan on Aug 29, 2016 5:39:05 GMT
Exactly what I meant, plus if the french surrendered during ww1 (which they didn't, they bravely fought), most of Europe would have been under the German Empire Yeah but if Britain was not there then the war would truly ne over by Christmas |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 29, 2016 5:49:22 GMT
What about th Falklands War? It was a no brainer really a relatively weak nation (compared to Britain) against one of the biggest world powers (past its prime, yes but still very strong). I honestly have no idea why Argentina would attack the British, it's clear they had no chance.
|
|
|
|
Post by Franz von Hipper on Aug 29, 2016 5:57:52 GMT
Exactly what I meant, plus if the french surrendered during ww1 (which they didn't, they bravely fought), most of Europe would have been under the German Empire Yeah but if Britain was not there then the war would truly ne over by Christmas If you have anymore surrender jokes, send them to Austria, they litteraly welcomed the Germans in Vienna during WW2 |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 29, 2016 5:59:39 GMT
Yeah but if Britain was not there then the war would truly ne over by Christmas If you have anymore surrender jokes, send them to Austria, they litteraly welcomed the Germans in Vienna during WW2 ANSHCLUSSZEIT! |
|
|
|
Post by Franz von Hipper on Aug 29, 2016 6:00:27 GMT
Exactly what I meant, plus if the french surrendered during ww1 (which they didn't, they bravely fought), most of Europe would have been under the German Empire Yeah but if Britain was not there then the war would truly ne over by Christmas Yeah, but Britain was there. And if the USA and the Soviets didn't show up in WW2, no more Britain. |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 29, 2016 6:42:34 GMT
Yeah but if Britain was not there then the war would truly ne over by Christmas Yeah, but Britain was there. And if the USA and the Soviets didn't show up in WW2, no more Britain. Soviets yes America no. All America did in Europe was speed the allied victory up by a number of years. It was Te British who held on practically alone for most of the war and Britain who all but destroyed the Lufftwafe, it was Te Soviets who lost millions of men and defeated Germany. America just came in at the end. I will admit the pacific was a different story. The Americans (with massive help from the Chinese) won that. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivan Kolev on Aug 29, 2016 11:48:30 GMT
Yeah, but Britain was there. And if the USA and the Soviets didn't show up in WW2, no more Britain. Soviets yes America no. All America did in Europe was speed the allied victory up by a number of years. It was Te British who held on practically alone for most of the war and Britain who all but destroyed the Lufftwafe, it was Te Soviets who lost millions of men and defeated Germany. America just came in at the end. I will admit the pacific was a different story. The Americans (with massive help from the Chinese) won that. Europe: Militarily, we were strong forces in Operation Torch and the invasion of Italy which heavily weakened Germany. We also participated in D-Day, which, without it, much of Europe could've been swept over by the Soviets and become communist dictatorships. Aid-wise, however, we were VERY important. We were the arsenal of Democracy, supplying thousands of weapons such as tanks to the USSR, China and Britain, helping them enormously. Pacific: We didn't do much on mainland Asia apart from in New Guinea and Burma, but in the Pacific we were basically the main force over there. We destroyed four Japanese aircraft carriers at Midway, we died on Okinawa taking the island, and we would have died in Operation Downfall if not for the A-Bombs. |
|
