|
|
Post by forumusername on Aug 12, 2015 2:24:39 GMT
No offense but if you're going to be censoring my stuff, I'd rather not have it up at all. Deleted.
And if you are going to touch my posts next time, I'd prefer you do the same as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by saltin on Aug 12, 2015 8:14:56 GMT
forumusername I didn't edit your post that would have been too much to change,I just added a few key words to the censor code of the forums and the edits happen automatically from now on and also retroactively . Never needed to do this before and we had thousands of visitors. For the record I liked your post,and I understand that often players are frustrated and feel the need to express that frustration,but I want to keep the forums open to all,and that mean I got to occasionally sanitize posts..hope you understand.
|
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Aug 12, 2015 15:48:27 GMT
Lol dude it's not like there aren't "substitutions" or other words for swears, everyone would know what you mean if you said frick or heck or even shiznit if anyone says that anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 12, 2015 17:19:21 GMT
But yeah we still need to check who's saying what.
I mean duh you can't allow a guy to write duck (not the bird) or stuff like that.
Too much auto-correct could become a nuisance though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Aug 12, 2015 19:37:40 GMT
But yeah we still need to check who's saying what. I mean duh you can't allow a guy to write duck (not the bird) or stuff like that. Too much auto-correct could become a nuisance though. The one invention that haunts us all, the bane of human existence...AUTOCORRECT. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Aug 12, 2015 19:50:11 GMT
When I don't want my auto correct to work, it works. But when I'm actually ( autocorrected 3 times to tally wtf) in need of it autocorrect sux
|
|
|
|
Post by The Armchair General on Aug 14, 2015 8:31:22 GMT
Challenge demanded.
Challenge given.
Challenge outcome?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Tic
.
.
.
Toc
.
.
.
Tic
.
.
.Toc
.
.
.
What's happening,who is winning,inquiring minds want to know!
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 14, 2015 10:12:10 GMT
Bah!! The guy who wanted a challenge got north korea but I think he is still occupying south korea.
|
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Aug 14, 2015 16:09:39 GMT
I tried South Korea. Within first few rounds, China nuked Seoul and dropped paratroop. I was GAME OVER.  |
|
|
|
Post by Newbie on Aug 14, 2015 17:37:54 GMT
When i played as north korea i was able to occupy south korea and all of japan, but after that the u.s. Sent 30 aircraft carriers and bombed all of my invasion troops  |
|
|
|
Post by saltin on Aug 15, 2015 7:16:42 GMT
I tried South Korea. Within first few rounds, China nuked Seoul and dropped paratroop. I was GAME OVER. I played it once and the exact same thing happened,it took me a few seconds to realize I actually really just LOST a conquest  I am sure we can win it,we would just need to secure a second city really fast to make sure the nuke/paratroopers doesnt take our only city. newbie it was a worthy try,we just have to find a better strategy and we can win these challenges! |
|
|
|
Post by Moreau on Aug 15, 2015 23:26:25 GMT
Germany 1960
|
|
