|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 4, 2016 21:31:01 GMT
We've had a few members of the fairer sex with female characters on the forum @coolguy14. None are active nowadays tho (Haven't seen Amatsukaze since June) Dude she was online before 5 hours I haven't seen her post since June, anyway
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 21:31:28 GMT
We've had a few members of the fairer sex with female characters on the forum @coolguy14. None are active nowadays tho (Haven't seen Amatsukaze since June) I guess I just never knew, goes to show what happens when you assume things. Bad boy, you should not assume things *shows corner*
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 21:32:49 GMT
Dude she was online before 5 hours I haven't seen her post since June, anyway August 22
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Sept 4, 2016 21:39:04 GMT
Least spam and most on topic member is literally the exact same thing. The technical advisor I assume is for the modders. 1. We already have a category for that, and 2. Only about 4 people would qualify. Sorry, but which of these is about modders? Most Helpful: Won by Fritz Erich von Manstein RP Commander (currently voting): Best Profile: Least Spam: Most Active in Game Boards: Best Organizational Skills: Most Historically Knowledgeable: Forum Comedian: Least spam is not the same thing as on topic, as those are completely 2 different things I was mistaken about the modding thing but it will be added. And yes, least spam and most on topic are the same thing.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 21:45:02 GMT
Sorry, but which of these is about modders? Most Helpful: Won by Fritz Erich von Manstein RP Commander (currently voting): Best Profile: Least Spam: Most Active in Game Boards: Best Organizational Skills: Most Historically Knowledgeable: Forum Comedian: Least spam is not the same thing as on topic, as those are completely 2 different things I was mistaken about the modding thing but it will be added. And yes, least spam and most on topic are the same thing. How? Look at dudes like aa and aaa, they has never spammed as they has never posted, but look at Amatsukaze, she has never went out of topic and never spammed unlike most of us, I would award her not those 2
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 4, 2016 21:47:30 GMT
I was mistaken about the modding thing but it will be added. And yes, least spam and most on topic are the same thing. How? Look at dudes like aa and aaa, they has never spammed as they has never posted, but look at Amatsukaze , she has never went out of topic and never spammed unlike most of us, I would award her not those 2 Buddy, you're forgetting the human filter behind it. Mountbatten and I only picked active, contributing members Also, aaa is actually an account of the Batten spammer, so bad, very bad example
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 21:52:10 GMT
How? Look at dudes like aa and aaa, they has never spammed as they has never posted, but look at Amatsukaze , she has never went out of topic and never spammed unlike most of us, I would award her not those 2 Buddy, you're forgetting the human filter behind it. Mountbatten and I only picked active, contributing members Also, aaa is actually an account of the Batten spammer, so bad, very bad example OK then, but I think none of most active members deserves non spammer, actually none who has more than 1000 posts currently does
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 4, 2016 21:53:55 GMT
Buddy, you're forgetting the human filter behind it. Mountbatten and I only picked active, contributing members Also, aaa is actually an account of the Batten spammer, so bad, very bad example OK then, but I think none of most active members deserves non spammer, actually none who has more than 1000 posts currently does I can name several, but I don't want to leak award nominees
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 21:57:05 GMT
OK then, but I think none of most active members deserves non spammer, actually none who has more than 1000 posts currently does I can name several, but I don't want to leak award nominees As I said they should not be from members with over 1000 posts
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 4, 2016 21:58:29 GMT
I can name several, but I don't want to leak award nominees As I said they should not be from members with over 1000 posts Like I said, I can name several members with 1000+ posts who have never spammed. Erich von Manstein comes to mind, but he already won an award and is therefore ineligible
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 4, 2016 22:04:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 22:05:09 GMT
As I said they should not be from members with over 1000 posts Like I said, I can name several members with 1000+ posts who have never spammed. Erich von Manstein comes to mind, but he already won an award and is therefore ineligible I don't believe I've ever spammed, but I'm not entirely sure on the definition of spam for this forum.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 22:07:59 GMT
As I said they should not be from members with over 1000 posts Like I said, I can name several members with 1000+ posts who have never spammed. Erich von Manstein comes to mind, but he already won an award and is therefore ineligible Ask him, and he'll tell you he has spammed, not that much, but has, hell even saltin can't say he is white and fluffy(this is not racism, idk why sometimes people thinks it is), we don't deserve it, every one of us should understand that
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 22:10:00 GMT
Like I said, I can name several members with 1000+ posts who have never spammed. Erich von Manstein comes to mind, but he already won an award and is therefore ineligible I don't believe I've ever spammed, but I'm not entirely sure on the definition of spam for this forum. Believe me you have done it quite a lot
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 4, 2016 22:17:34 GMT
Like I said, I can name several members with 1000+ posts who have never spammed. Erich von Manstein comes to mind, but he already won an award and is therefore ineligible I don't believe I've ever spammed, but I'm not entirely sure on the definition of spam for this forum. You did some. Not as much as me, Napoleon Bonaparte, or The Light Bringer, but you did some
|
|