|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 18:11:45 GMT
I know I'm not the only one who does not like the way nominations and candidates are selected, for example best profile, how it is decided who the candidates are, I could take 3 random members from the list and make you vote. Also least spam? I know that all 3 candidates will tell they has spammed enough, not to earn such thing, why? because honestly I have already told that, none of members with over 1000 posts hasn't spammed, OK I could agree Singlemalt (not 1000 posts yet BTW) hasn't spammed that much, but how comes that members like Amatsukaze, yuanzhong, Der Kaiserreich aren't there? There is something wrong if the system chooses only between 20 active members, as this is not always the best part of membership I hope that at least saltin, Erich von Manstein, Ivan Kolev, kanue, Napoleon Bonaparte, Jean-Luc Picard will read this. Sincerely yours The Light Bringer |
|
|
|
Post by Ivan Kolev on Sept 5, 2016 18:30:28 GMT
I can sorta agree with least spam, and I do believe that the "Best Profile" one should be decided by the masses as that one is basically a popularity contest and is supposed to be one, but for the rest of them, idc really.
But about least spam, this is one of those things where it's bound to cause controversy imo. Because while some members have joined and never said a word, could that be considered "Least spam"? Sure...I guess, but that doesn't really mean much at all if that's the case, and that's basically supporting the idea that members shouldn't post much by handing out an award for it.
Well okay, how about we restrict to only people who have over X amount of posts? Well that still doesn't work because then it only reserves it to members who have stayed longer than others, which isn't very fair imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 18:38:13 GMT
I can sorta agree with least spam, and I do believe that the "Best Profile" one should be decided by the masses as that one is basically a popularity contest and is supposed to be one, but for the rest of them, idc really. But about least spam, this is one of those things where it's bound to cause controversy imo. Because while some members have joined and never said a word, could that be considered "Least spam"? Sure...I guess, but that doesn't really mean much at all if that's the case, and that's basically supporting the idea that members shouldn't post much by handing out an award for it. Well okay, how about we restrict to only people who have over X amount of posts? Well that still doesn't work because then it only reserves it to members who have stayed longer than others, which isn't very fair imo. That's what I'm saying, this is more a popularity contest then fair fight |
|
|
|
Post by Ivan Kolev on Sept 5, 2016 18:40:51 GMT
I can sorta agree with least spam, and I do believe that the "Best Profile" one should be decided by the masses as that one is basically a popularity contest and is supposed to be one, but for the rest of them, idc really. But about least spam, this is one of those things where it's bound to cause controversy imo. Because while some members have joined and never said a word, could that be considered "Least spam"? Sure...I guess, but that doesn't really mean much at all if that's the case, and that's basically supporting the idea that members shouldn't post much by handing out an award for it. Well okay, how about we restrict to only people who have over X amount of posts? Well that still doesn't work because then it only reserves it to members who have stayed longer than others, which isn't very fair imo. That's what I'm saying, this is more a popularity contest then fair fight I'm disagreeing with you completely, I'm saying that for "Best Profile", it should be a popularity contest. The rest of them are determined by only two, presumably unbiased, people, them being Mountbatten and Jean-Luc Picard. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Sept 5, 2016 19:04:43 GMT
If it bothers you that much then we will just cancel the whole thing. Will that float your boat better The Light Bringer? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 19:47:03 GMT
If it bothers you that much then we will just cancel the whole thing. Will that float your boat better The Light Bringer? For the least spam, perhaps call it least spam posts for high-post members. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 19:48:01 GMT
That's what I'm saying, this is more a popularity contest then fair fight I'm disagreeing with you completely, I'm saying that for "Best Profile", it should be a popularity contest. The rest of them are determined by only two, presumably unbiased, people, them being Mountbatten and Jean-Luc Picard. I kinda said that should be like that, but not like it is for now... |
|
|
|
Post by Singlemalt on Sept 5, 2016 19:48:54 GMT
The Light Bringer, you made you point yesterday didnt you? I did the same and wont change it now my name is on there.... You disagree with the current strategy and you made it clear. I doubt the contest is good for the forum which i stated (emotions are hurt). This should be enough.. My question for you is just stop and accept others (mods) decided to do it their way, which is not yours.. Sincerely
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 19:49:52 GMT
I'm disagreeing with you completely, I'm saying that for "Best Profile", it should be a popularity contest. The rest of them are determined by only two, presumably unbiased, people, them being Mountbatten and Jean-Luc Picard. I kinda said that should be like that, but not like it is for now... Question: Is the only reason that you're complaining about it, because you weren't nominated? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 5, 2016 19:51:33 GMT
I think it is good enough as is. Maybe we can add a "rising star" category for new members who are doing well
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 19:53:46 GMT
If it bothers you that much then we will just cancel the whole thing. Will that float your boat better The Light Bringer? Im talking about proper way to make it, not canceling it.. . |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 19:55:58 GMT
If it bothers you that much then we will just cancel the whole thing. Will that float your boat better The Light Bringer? Im talking about proper way to make it, not canceling it.. . Well if you think the other is so bad, don't complain. Start offering suggestions. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 19:57:25 GMT
I kinda said that should be like that, but not like it is for now... Question: Is the only reason that you're complaining about it, because you weren't nominated? No, I'm nominated, but I'm talking about those nominations, that aren't possible for high rank members, as it is wrong to do it that way when we have members that would had been better fit for that |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 19:59:21 GMT
Question: Is the only reason that you're complaining about it, because you weren't nominated? No, I'm nominated, but I'm talking about those nominations, that aren't possible for high rank members, as it is wrong to do it that way when we have members that would had been better fit for that Like I said, offer suggestions... |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 20:00:44 GMT
Im talking about proper way to make it, not canceling it.. . Well if you think the other is so bad, don't complain. Start offering suggestions. I am saying that people fit for nomination should be selected publicly |
|
