|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Sept 6, 2016 18:26:56 GMT
wut fangirl? ahh I wont bother bout it now Just a dumb joke, belay what I said. Sorry lol.  |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Sept 6, 2016 18:36:01 GMT
Changed to Jean-Luc Picard . Anyway: I say neither Lannes nor Suvorov. Victoria will suffice You can argue for Lannes that Minxiepoo, might use it for your France 1798 challenge |
|
|
|
Post by Minxiepoo on Sept 6, 2016 18:38:10 GMT
the tarven gen but you can buy him on round 35 and that is a waste when he gets to the front line it will be too late
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Sept 6, 2016 18:45:16 GMT
the tarven gen but you can buy him on round 35 and that is a waste when he gets to the front line it will be too late Do one thing then Play as Russia 1798. That way you have suvorov and you can test Lannes in Paris  |
|
|
|
Post by Minxiepoo on Sept 6, 2016 18:47:29 GMT
suvorov has higher rank than lannes in the tavern
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Sept 6, 2016 18:48:56 GMT
suvorov has higher rank than lannes in the tavern That does not matter, Just test the outputs of the generals and you decides |
|
|
|
Post by Minxiepoo on Sept 6, 2016 18:51:36 GMT
it matters bigger health bigger damage
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Sept 6, 2016 19:01:34 GMT
it matters bigger health bigger damage No... That is not true To make it fair, just try a few times |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Sept 6, 2016 19:45:44 GMT
Minx, in every Easytech game so far, the relative percentage of the unit health is a factor toward damage output, not the absolute value of how much health the unit has.
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Sept 6, 2016 19:54:59 GMT
Minx, in every Easytech game so far, the relative percentage of the unit health is a factor toward damage output, not the absolute value of how much health the unit has. Otherwise Gamelin and Graziani would be OP  |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Sept 6, 2016 19:56:49 GMT
Minx, in every Easytech game so far, the relative percentage of the unit health is a factor toward damage output, not the absolute value of how much health the unit has. Otherwise Gamelin and Graziani would be OP would be even more OP than before. |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Sept 6, 2016 20:01:57 GMT
Otherwise Gamelin and Graziani would be OP would be even more OP than before. And EW4 generals would be only strong on guards stuff and naval, giving the French and Ottoman systems an advantage and the US system entirely rubbish. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Sept 7, 2016 1:12:00 GMT
And EW4 generals would be only strong on guards stuff and naval, giving the French and Ottoman systems an advantage and the US system entirely rubbish. Dearborn: Gentlemen, time for using our Machine Guns and Ironclads to tell those Europeans who's the new overlord! |
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on Sept 7, 2016 2:59:28 GMT
IMO, it's depend on how you eager to pay ^^! (don't count Victoria)
If you want the best Inf and Hybrid and eager to pay / grind: Go for Suvorov and Poniatowski, best Inf and Hybrid Gens.
If you want the best sole Inf: Suvorov
If you want very good Inf and also can be used for other unit well: go for Lannes.
|
|
|
|
Post by granny's terror on Sept 8, 2016 12:24:37 GMT
For me Lannes is the best cuz he's a hybrid and has skills that can be used in any situation.
|
|
