|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Sept 15, 2016 11:46:52 GMT
I should have been more clear, what I meant to say was that countries far from the front like Liechtenstein can go through for example Bavaria or Austria to attack the North Germans, so instead of sitting around doing nothing why not just let them do something? If Liechtenstein gets to be involved in the wars with soldiers, etc then it should lose the +5 turn bonus because it's so weak anyway. I don't plan to give it a bonus as of now, I don't want another Switzerland (#tw1) meddling around and then going all defensive. Though I will see this Liechtenstein thing. |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Sept 15, 2016 11:49:24 GMT
If Liechtenstein gets to be involved in the wars with soldiers, etc then it should lose the +5 turn bonus because it's so weak anyway. I don't plan to give it a bonus as of now, I don't want another Switzerland (#tw1) meddling around and then going all defensive. Though I will see this Liechtenstein thing. Yay Liechtenstein (its like my 6th favourite country or something). |
|
|
|
Post by Laurent de Gouvion on Sept 15, 2016 12:38:06 GMT
But I mean if Liechtenstein gets +5 turns per phase but can't build or move military units, it's going to be just pure research and then blank turns for the rest of the game. A single enemy army would just walk into Liechtenstein, lol. I should have been more clear, what I meant to say was that countries far from the front like Liechtenstein can go through for example Bavaria or Austria to attack the North Germans, so instead of sitting around doing nothing why not just let them do something? Or they could send their troops to be under Bavarian/Austrian command. I don't agree with the idea of troops crossing allied teritorries willy-nilly, there should be some cost to it. |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Sept 15, 2016 12:47:29 GMT
I should have been more clear, what I meant to say was that countries far from the front like Liechtenstein can go through for example Bavaria or Austria to attack the North Germans, so instead of sitting around doing nothing why not just let them do something? Or they could send their troops to be under Bavarian/Austrian command. I don't agree with the idea of troops crossing allied teritorries willy-nilly, there should be some cost to it. The von Liechtenstein are Austrians, so they would be allied to Austria. In fact, most of the family effectively forgot they had Liechtenstein. |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Sept 15, 2016 21:37:18 GMT
I should have been more clear, what I meant to say was that countries far from the front like Liechtenstein can go through for example Bavaria or Austria to attack the North Germans, so instead of sitting around doing nothing why not just let them do something? Or they could send their troops to be under Bavarian/Austrian command. I don't agree with the idea of troops crossing allied teritorries willy-nilly, there should be some cost to it. That feature would leads to abuse. Austria throws his troops on Prussia, Liech spam troops, send them to Austria, Austria throws more troops away, Prussia drown under the swarm. |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Sept 15, 2016 21:43:08 GMT
Or they could send their troops to be under Bavarian/Austrian command. I don't agree with the idea of troops crossing allied teritorries willy-nilly, there should be some cost to it. That feature would leads to abuse. Austria throws his troops on Prussia, Liech spam troops, send them to Austria, Austria throws more troops away, Prussia drown under the swarm. Agreed. Troops should be transported with a price per province that is not theirs. And Liech should be Austrian-allied, but cannot build more than 3 armies (Liech cannot support more than that unless if invade another nation) |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Sept 15, 2016 21:45:38 GMT
That feature would leads to abuse. Austria throws his troops on Prussia, Liech spam troops, send them to Austria, Austria throws more troops away, Prussia drown under the swarm. Agreed. Troops should be transported with a price per province that is not theirs. And Liech should be Austrian-allied, but cannot build more than 3 armies (Liech cannot support more than that unless if invade another nation) I'm pretty sure Napoleon Bonaparte would make sure that a turn is required for each province crossed (whether if your own or ally's) before you can actually touch an enemy. We will have to see what the map looks like before speculating further on this. *shurgs* |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Oct 4, 2016 13:06:47 GMT
When I said Liechtenstein should have +5 turns and no army I was referencing that it has a very good GDP for its size and no Millitary today. I was joking, I know it's silly to not be able to have troops and just tech up because you wouldn't be able to bpacrully put the techs into use.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Oct 6, 2016 15:03:21 GMT
Luxembourg?
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Oct 6, 2016 15:13:55 GMT
War ded, I left the TW format for an indefinite period of time (yet I still view the board)
|
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Oct 7, 2016 4:10:17 GMT
War ded, I left the TW format for an indefinite period of time (yet I still view the board) Why did you leave? |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Oct 7, 2016 14:48:25 GMT
War ded, I left the TW format for an indefinite period of time (yet I still view the board) Why did you leave? /\ Same Fred is doing what he can do to develop his TW and then revive the TWs with his TW14. Yours don't have to be the very next one. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Oct 7, 2016 16:59:21 GMT
Basically I don't have the energy I had with which I used to play the TWs, its a phase I think when you just get tired and eventually the craze fades away
|
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Oct 9, 2016 3:25:29 GMT
/\ Same Fred is doing what he can do to develop his TW and then revive the TWs with his TW14. Yours don't have to be the very next one. I thought your TW was next? |
|
