|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Sept 15, 2016 15:16:42 GMT
The 2 worst 5 Star artillery general. Who do you think sucks less? Ill give my opinion later
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Sept 15, 2016 15:43:58 GMT
The 2 worst 5 Star artillery general. Who do you think sucks less? Ill give my opinion later Lin B hands down is the worst, as he has NO SERIOUS ARTY SKILLS, and still a nuke will cripple him so Leeb is much much better |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Sept 15, 2016 16:19:24 GMT
Stats
Wilhelm Josef Franz Ritter von Leeb
Colonel
Health: 140
Infantry: **
Tank: ***
Artillery: *****
Air Force: N/A
Navy: N/A
Movement: *
Artillery Leader: ***
Explosives: ***
Defense Tactc: **
Shelter Expert: **
Price: 2060
Lin Biao
L General
Health: 200
Infantry: ***
Tank: N/A
Artillery: *****
Air Force: *
Navy: N/A
Movement: *
Bayonet Charge: *
Ace Forces: *
Explosives: *
Shelter Expert: ****
Price: 2030
Avarage Output/damage
Trolling Govorov: 28+15+1,28=44
Lin B: 28
Leeb: 28+1,92= 30
Damage below 50
Trolling Govorov: 21+15+0,8+24=61
Lin B: 21
Leeb: 21+1,92=23
Damage against cities
Trolling Govorov: 28+15+0,8+16=60
Leeb: 28+1,2+24=53
Lin B: 28+8=36
Damage conclusion:
The avarage damage and below 50 doesn't differ much. but Leeb is simply better at cracking cities.
Survivability:
Leeb: Defense, 4% non-air damage reduction
Anti-Nuke, 10& air damage reduction
140 lives
Lin B: Ace forces lvl1
Anti-nuke, 20% air damage reduction
200 lives
Clear victory for Lin B.
Movement:
Both only 1 star --> 2 hexes on field artillery
Medals:
2060 = Leeb
2030 = Lin B.
i don't spot the difference...
Other:
Lin B. can be used as crappy infantry as well...
Conclusion
When you're drunk and willing to buy one of these...
leeb is the better city cracker.
Lin B has better survivability.
I would go for Lin B since i think City cracking<Surviving
or just buy him to save yourself wasting 30 medals...
|
|
|
|
Post by Stonewall Jackson on Sept 17, 2016 2:09:45 GMT
As Washington stated, Lin B is FAR worse due to absolutely no artillery skills what so ever... Those shiny gold stars don't seem good anymore, do they? |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Sept 17, 2016 6:51:47 GMT
As Washington stated, Lin B is FAR worse due to absolutely no artillery skills what so ever... Those shiny gold stars don't seem good anymore, do they? And leeb has? |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Sept 17, 2016 7:57:42 GMT
As Washington stated, Lin B is FAR worse due to absolutely no artillery skills what so ever... Those shiny gold stars don't seem good anymore, do they? And leeb has? Well art leader and explosives can be counted as crappy ones |
|
|
|
Post by Stonewall Jackson on Sept 17, 2016 15:05:04 GMT
As Washington stated, Lin B is FAR worse due to absolutely no artillery skills what so ever... Those shiny gold stars don't seem good anymore, do they? And leeb has? Not saying Leeb has anything special, he is still crap. But Leeb at least has explosives which makes him FAR superior in cracking cities. In average damage output they are both neck and neck for the most part. The only thing Lin B has that Leeb does not is survivability, but what good is that when you don't have decent output? |
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on Sept 17, 2016 16:31:36 GMT
IMHO Leeb is better. Because arty general in most cases have to be kept away from receiving damage, so those 60 hp are not so critical, but Leeb can crack cities faster this way saving hp by shortening battles and also help you proceed quicker, which can be critical in campaigns. However, as we have already discussed in one other theme, Leeb is not recommended. And the same is Lin.
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Sept 17, 2016 22:58:16 GMT
Cracking cities looks more attractive to me than extra health.
|
|
