|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Oct 25, 2016 17:47:49 GMT
Playing as Glorious Han China.
In stalemate with Huns, Hannibal died to Huns, Leonidas didn't even get a hit in before he died by some cav, and warring with the Japanese (tavern gens vs Yoshitsune) for Taiwan and Tokyo (we backdoored each other).
Atilla and Alexander got Rekt, Mocteczuma is peaced out with me as I don't want him entering Sapporo while I kill Japan, and I might go kill Xerxes as soon as I get another Tavern gen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Oct 25, 2016 19:04:47 GMT
I will be honest: Fog of War annoys me, and the graphics are childish. Still worthwhile
|
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Oct 25, 2016 19:16:28 GMT
My Emperor, British 1st Amry is defeated while attacking Brussels, but England is still isnt invadable easy, they have 2 more guardians of the Isle.
We have been demolished at the antlantic even dough we had superior numbers.
NOW We have an Amry that has Reconquered The Altantic and Washigton is captured.
Our Ally is defeated, May Alexanders Sacrifice be not in vain.
We have advanced to the Medival Age.
We are prepairing on a invasion of Africa, but we have to defeat the Hun first.
Iberia is doing well but they have lost 2 cities but Carthage protects them from any of oir attacks, if we advance, Carthage Navy will capture our city.
Porto has changed hands 2 Times , their counterattack made of 5 Rams and a Chariot was Weakenee heavily but still we were outnumbered and oir army was defeated.
We have done a counterattack and we have Porto,Iberia lost 5 Rams they have 2 Rams left, we are just waiting for them to attack so their army is massacred
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Oct 25, 2016 20:01:12 GMT
Is there any regen/healing items?
|
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Oct 25, 2016 21:35:14 GMT
On page 12, last comment, one said that it's not realistic that a general can win outnumbered 50-1. I believe that Wellington once defeated an enemy outnumbered 20 to 1. And no doubt there have been much grander achievements. Of course, the weakest tier of generals cannot hope to match Wellesley. Also, while timeframe is wrong, Inca WERE an empire, and is there anyone in south america other than them, to put in a game set in olden times? Also, while they could use the Mali Empire, it was a saharan country, which as far as I know never did much in places popular in writen history. Also having carthage allows a classic enemy for rome, which some sub-saharan nation (other than Ethiopia) would not. I dont want fog of war, I know it was in GOG, but I dont really feel like its the easy tech way. And I did not particularly like it in GOG. The biggest tragedy however, is leonidas being weak. If they had put Quintus Fabius, in charge of history, and casted Desophaeus as Leonidas, all these problems could have been avoided. |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Oct 25, 2016 21:57:28 GMT
On page 12, last comment, one said that it's not realistic that a general can win outnumbered 50-1. I believe that Wellington once defeated an enemy outnumbered 20 to 1. And no doubt there have been much grander achievements. Of course, the weakest tier of generals cannot hope to match Wellesley. Also, while timeframe is wrong, Inca WERE an empire, and is there anyone in south america other than them, to put in a game set in olden times? Also, while they could use the Mali Empire, it was a saharan country, which as far as I know never did much in places popular in writen history. Also having carthage allows a classic enemy for rome, which some sub-saharan nation (other than Ethiopia) would not. I dont want fog of war, I know it was in GOG, but I dont really feel like its the easy tech way. And I did not particularly like it in GOG. The biggest tragedy however, is leonidas being weak. If they had put Quintus Fabius , in charge of history, and casted Desophaeus as Leonidas, all these problems could have been avoided. Tack! 1. It's still not realistic unless if said gen built a fort from the maginot line in 19th century Africa. 2. Moche, Chimu, etc. FOr aztecs, there were the Maya. 3. I think they are going Civ and AoE way--replace nations with similar ones (e.g. ROme for Italy, Carthage for any NA/WA nation) 4. FoW is good IMO. |
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Oct 25, 2016 22:10:53 GMT
Huh. I know the Portuguese attacked Brazilian tribes, but was not aware there were any serious contenders for sun lord of south america. I avoided mentioning Aztecs, as of course there are the maya, and Tlaxcalans among many others.
Is egypt in game, or did Cleopara escape capture? I still dont see any perfect sub-saharan replacement for Carthage. Ethiopia is good, as it had relations with rome and was considered very strong, but of course its in east Africa/ maybe im underestimating Mali, but probably not.
I dont get your first point. Wouldn't a fort from the maginot line be unrealistic? You may hate forts being a gameplay characteristic, but what does that have to do with my points? And the general in easy tech is only ever outnumbered by a few times, the enemy soldiers being leaderless (well, no big names)
I can live with FOW. Besides, the game is more than just battle.
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Oct 25, 2016 23:04:11 GMT
Is there a purchase price tag on it? Like, do I have to pay before I can download? nay Leonidas, you don't have to pay anything. Plus you're continuously dying in my game. I think you really need some items. Yaeh Leonidas is crap. Leave him behind and don't upgrade him |
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Oct 25, 2016 23:34:40 GMT
In any case it would be cool to have aliens faithful to the war of the worlds design. and not the american knock off. Alliens done right if you ask me.
have any of you heard of the strategy game based on the musical version (jeff wayne) of war of the worlds? Looks pretty good. Is from 1998.
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Oct 26, 2016 2:03:38 GMT
For the new players I highly recommend chosing either Roman or China in your first conquest.
Those 2 are the biggest countries.
|
|
|
|
Post by delinard on Oct 26, 2016 6:52:29 GMT
REMOVED save the day,thx for android version,so far the campaigns were fun i completed entire ancient age,and allies weren't complete crap,fog of war dosen't fit for easytech games but owell,hopefully we will be able to use the code in shop section to load on offical android version of playstore.Haven't played much of conquest so far only conquered London with Scottish lads.
Hopefully there will be ability to get revenue becose my upgrade choices were horrible.
Moderated:
Please refrain from naming ethnic groups unnecessarily.
|
|
|
|
Post by Philip II of Macedon on Oct 26, 2016 11:16:28 GMT
Hmm I avoid this forum to avoid ew5 jealousy but I also miss the apk for a few days... I can't win!
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Oct 26, 2016 12:40:04 GMT
Huh. I know the Portuguese attacked Brazilian tribes, but was not aware there were any serious contenders for sun lord of south america. I avoided mentioning Aztecs, as of course there are the maya, and Tlaxcalans among many others. Is egypt in game, or did Cleopara escape capture? I still dont see any perfect sub-saharan replacement for Carthage. Ethiopia is good, as it had relations with rome and was considered very strong, but of course its in east Africa/ maybe im underestimating Mali, but probably not. I dont get your first point. Wouldn't a fort from the maginot line be unrealistic? You may hate forts being a gameplay characteristic, but what does that have to do with my points? And the general in easy tech is only ever outnumbered by a few times, the enemy soldiers being leaderless (well, no big names) I can live with FOW. Besides, the game is more than just battle. I am saying, unless if the 50 is hopelessly tech disadvantaged and the 1 is not, 50-1 wins by the '1' is unrealistic. |
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Oct 28, 2016 2:19:02 GMT
hmm, when the swedes totally massacred Russian armies, what was the difference in tech? True, though like I said, a general and their unit is never so outnumbered in easy tech games, if I remember correctly. (european war 3 can get pretty bad, in terms of a general being outnumbered more than 4-1 regularly)
Just got it working through the android link on first page, though like I think someone said, having trouble getting it to load. though I just played long enough to unlock conquest.
First impression is that yes, it is childish in appearance, but I think its cute how the greek navy ships look greek (you know, the googly eyes) I also have not yet comprehended what differentiates the Generals.
I think I will start with rome as suggested, but part of my heritage demands I play as Scotland eventually.
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Oct 28, 2016 14:38:28 GMT
hmm, when the swedes totally massacred Russian armies, what was the difference in tech? True, though like I said, a general and their unit is never so outnumbered in easy tech games, if I remember correctly. (european war 3 can get pretty bad, in terms of a general being outnumbered more than 4-1 regularly) Just got it working through the android link on first page, though like I think someone said, having trouble getting it to load. though I just played long enough to unlock conquest. First impression is that yes, it is childish in appearance, but I think its cute how the greek navy ships look greek (you know, the googly eyes) I also have not yet comprehended what differentiates the Generals. I think I will start with rome as suggested, but part of my heritage demands I play as Scotland eventually. Rome/China IMO. |
|
