|
|
Post by Yi Sun Sin on Apr 29, 2017 14:58:02 GMT
Any one doing Great Britain soon? Why? Wellesley sucks, navy generals that aren't named Kate aren't used. All Great Britain's good generals are navy generals. Horatio Nelson could be decent for artillery, but I wouldn't recommend buying British gerneals unless you have A LOT of money to throw around. Wellesley sucks? That could be debated. |
|
|
|
Post by Louis-Alexandre Berthier on Apr 29, 2017 14:59:36 GMT
Why? Wellesley sucks, navy generals that aren't named Kate aren't used. All Great Britain's good generals are navy generals. Horatio Nelson could be decent for artillery, but I wouldn't recommend buying British gerneals unless you have A LOT of money to throw around. Wellesley sucks? That could be debated. In this game, as an IAP, Wellesley isn't worth getting. There are too many other good choices if you are going to buy IAP's. |
|
|
|
Post by Yi Sun Sin on Apr 29, 2017 15:04:23 GMT
Wellesley sucks? That could be debated. In this game, as an IAP, Wellesley isn't worth getting. There are too many other good choices if you are going to buy IAP's. True, but if you only look at infantry Wellesley is quite a good choice. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Apr 29, 2017 16:02:13 GMT
Any one doing Great Britain soon? Why? Wellesley sucks, navy generals that aren't named Kate aren't used. All Great Britain's good generals are navy generals. Horatio Nelson could be decent for artillery, but I wouldn't recommend buying British gerneals unless you have A LOT of money to throw around. Wellesley is not bad at all, he is one of the five best infantry generals in the game, but just doesn't worth getting. Nelson is not just "could be decent", he is one of the three best artillery generals in this game that can be compared with Moreau and Isabela. Nelson certainly worth it if you are getting him. |
|
|
|
Post by Louis-Alexandre Berthier on Apr 30, 2017 20:27:45 GMT
Why? Wellesley sucks, navy generals that aren't named Kate aren't used. All Great Britain's good generals are navy generals. Horatio Nelson could be decent for artillery, but I wouldn't recommend buying British gerneals unless you have A LOT of money to throw around. Wellesley is not bad at all, he is one of the five best infantry generals in the game, but just doesn't worth getting. Nelson is not just "could be decent", he is one of the three best artillery generals in this game that can be compared with Moreau and Isabela. Nelson certainly worth it if you are getting him. If you just look at output, it's true that Great Britain has some of the best generals in the game. But if you factor in the cost, they're just not worth it. Although Wellesley is one of the best infantry generals, you really don't need an infantry general. Nelson won't be worth getting in front of Moreau or Davout. Plus, you get Isabella and Sophia for free. So unless you spend a lot of money or play a hacked version, I wouldn't bother getting Wellesley or Nelson. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Apr 30, 2017 21:08:45 GMT
Wellesley is not bad at all, he is one of the five best infantry generals in the game, but just doesn't worth getting. Nelson is not just "could be decent", he is one of the three best artillery generals in this game that can be compared with Moreau and Isabela. Nelson certainly worth it if you are getting him. If you just look at output, it's true that Great Britain has some of the best generals in the game. But if you factor in the cost, they're just not worth it. Although Wellesley is one of the best infantry generals, you really don't need an infantry general. Nelson won't be worth getting in front of Moreau or Davout. Plus, you get Isabella and Sophia for free. So unless you spend a lot of money or play a hacked version, I wouldn't bother getting Wellesley or Nelson. I agree on Wellesley since we have Victoria. But Nelson is in fact worth the consideration, he is a special kind of artillery, unlike Moreau and Isabela(I call them the ordinary ones), he is a front line guy, who is the best damage dealer on artillery in ai's turn, his counterattack towards enemy can make a big amount of damage without getting frozen. His ability on artillery is the same special as Davout, it's just a matter of preference. |
|
|
|
Post by Thrawn on May 1, 2017 8:38:47 GMT
Infantry general to recruit? Get Dobeln, settled.
|
|
|
|
Post by Louis-Alexandre Berthier on May 1, 2017 23:19:18 GMT
If you just look at output, it's true that Great Britain has some of the best generals in the game. But if you factor in the cost, they're just not worth it. Although Wellesley is one of the best infantry generals, you really don't need an infantry general. Nelson won't be worth getting in front of Moreau or Davout. Plus, you get Isabella and Sophia for free. So unless you spend a lot of money or play a hacked version, I wouldn't bother getting Wellesley or Nelson. I agree on Wellesley since we have Victoria. But Nelson is in fact worth the consideration, he is a special kind of artillery, unlike Moreau and Isabela(I call them the ordinary ones), he is a front line guy, who is the best damage dealer on artillery in ai's turn, his counterattack towards enemy can make a big amount of damage without getting frozen. His ability on artillery is the same special as Davout, it's just a matter of preference. True, but Nelson isn't what you would call a standard pick for an IAP. Although Nelson is around the same level on artillery with Davout, if you are getting an IAP, remember that Davout is a great for cavalry too, which is better than navy. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 2, 2017 0:39:56 GMT
I agree on Wellesley since we have Victoria. But Nelson is in fact worth the consideration, he is a special kind of artillery, unlike Moreau and Isabela(I call them the ordinary ones), he is a front line guy, who is the best damage dealer on artillery in ai's turn, his counterattack towards enemy can make a big amount of damage without getting frozen. His ability on artillery is the same special as Davout, it's just a matter of preference. True, but Nelson isn't what you would call a standard pick for an IAP. Although Nelson is around the same level on artillery with Davout, if you are getting an IAP, remember that Davout is a great for cavalry too, which is better than navy. Around the same? What are you talking about? For people don't s/l Davout is just another Marmont on artillery and a faster Dumouriez on cavalry, while Nelson is equal to Sakurako if you always get your artillery heavily protected. Also, in SNS and RoA, you don't usually get 2 cavalry units at the beginning, and you will have Lan, then Davout's is just an artillery, while Nelson can fully release his navy potential in SNS. Again, Davout is designed for people who s/l ONLY, recommending Davout to someone don't like s/ling is just wasting their precious emblems. |
|
|
|
Post by Louis-Alexandre Berthier on May 2, 2017 23:38:18 GMT
True, but Nelson isn't what you would call a standard pick for an IAP. Although Nelson is around the same level on artillery with Davout, if you are getting an IAP, remember that Davout is a great for cavalry too, which is better than navy. Around the same? What are you talking about? For people don't s/l Davout is just another Marmont on artillery and a faster Dumouriez on cavalry, while Nelson is equal to Sakurako if you always get your artillery heavily protected. Also, in SNS and RoA, you don't usually get 2 cavalry units at the beginning, and you will have Lan, then Davout's is just an artillery, while Nelson can fully release his navy potential in SNS. Again, Davout is designed for people who s/l ONLY, recommending Davout to someone don't like s/ling is just wasting their precious emblems. Explosive is one of the better artillery skills, while surprise is one of the better cavalry skills. Geography is a great skill for both cavalry and artillery, saving you a warhorse. People who spend money on emblems usually do so because they have trouble rushing for princesses. For HRE, you need one good cavalry, one good artillery, and then another good cavalry or artillery. Davout will do both fine. S/l is such a big part of this game if you want to do well. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 3, 2017 2:06:17 GMT
Around the same? What are you talking about? For people don't s/l Davout is just another Marmont on artillery and a faster Dumouriez on cavalry, while Nelson is equal to Sakurako if you always get your artillery heavily protected. Also, in SNS and RoA, you don't usually get 2 cavalry units at the beginning, and you will have Lan, then Davout's is just an artillery, while Nelson can fully release his navy potential in SNS. Again, Davout is designed for people who s/l ONLY, recommending Davout to someone don't like s/ling is just wasting their precious emblems. Explosive is one of the better artillery skills, while surprise is one of the better cavalry skills. Geography is a great skill for both cavalry and artillery, saving you a warhorse. People who spend money on emblems usually do so because they have trouble rushing for princesses. For HRE, you need one good cavalry, one good artillery, and then another good cavalry or artillery. Davout will do both fine. S/l is such a big part of this game if you want to do well. S/l helps your performance, but not many people like heavy s/l, which Davout requires. For HRE rushing, Don't you have Sophia Dumouriez or Diez or someone for that? |
|
|
|
Post by Louis-Alexandre Berthier on May 3, 2017 20:51:51 GMT
Explosive is one of the better artillery skills, while surprise is one of the better cavalry skills. Geography is a great skill for both cavalry and artillery, saving you a warhorse. People who spend money on emblems usually do so because they have trouble rushing for princesses. For HRE, you need one good cavalry, one good artillery, and then another good cavalry or artillery. Davout will do both fine. S/l is such a big part of this game if you want to do well. S/l helps your performance, but not many people like heavy s/l, which Davout requires. For HRE rushing, Don't you have Sophia Dumouriez or Diez or someone for that? Most people buy IAP's early, getting a rusher, or they buy them late, as a filler. Davout as your cavalry is not a bad choice- he's faster than Dumoriez and only worse (oputput-wise) in terrain. If you use Davout, you won't need warhorse. S/l is tedious; I hate it. But it's also necessary. |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Jul 4, 2017 21:48:48 GMT
I have a complaint.
Suvorov is not higher on the list.
This a joke being?
|
|
|
|
Post by Marshal Ney on Jul 5, 2017 8:06:33 GMT
Victoria is better than Suvorov in infantry, Lannes can command equally well cavalry, Oudinot costs 950 medals. Then, cavalry and artillery are more useful
|
|
|
|
Post by Yi Sun Sin on Jul 5, 2017 9:46:14 GMT
I have a complaint. Suvorov is not higher on the list. This a joke being? I guess he's just not worth the emblems? |
|
