|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Oct 4, 2016 15:36:13 GMT
VlF: End of War BoE: Jutland
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Oct 4, 2016 16:33:39 GMT
VlF: End of War BoE: Jutland Jutland is a pain,I always feel that Battleship > Iron Clad
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Oct 4, 2016 17:14:21 GMT
VlF: End of War BoE: Jutland Jutland is a pain,I always feel that Battleship > Iron Clad No, it's because I don't have Kate. Or any navy, for that matter.
|
|
|
Post by Stonewall Jackson on Oct 4, 2016 17:19:15 GMT
Jutland is a pain,I always feel that Battleship > Iron Clad No, it's because I don't have Kate. Or any navy, for that matter. You could always buy the variant of Nelson
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Oct 4, 2016 17:45:56 GMT
What I did on Jutland.
Put all my generals on ships, prayed I win. I eventually do win
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Oct 4, 2016 18:04:37 GMT
Jutland? Put your best generals on a ship, afterwards surround and destroy.
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Oct 4, 2016 18:09:01 GMT
What I did on Jutland. Put all my generals on ships, prayed I win. I eventually do win RNG praying?
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Oct 4, 2016 18:12:55 GMT
VlF: End of War BoE: Jutland Jutland is a pain,I always feel that Battleship > Iron Clad Actually they do. GB Battleships have better output than German Ironclad. Prussian and Austrian navies are just crap(in original EW4).
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Oct 4, 2016 18:16:01 GMT
Jutland is a pain,I always feel that Battleship > Iron Clad Actually they do. GB Battleships have better output than German Ironclad. Prussian and Austrian navies are just crap(in original EW4). I always prefered Battleships, Ironclads are EXPENSIVE and I think they take more damage from forts
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Oct 4, 2016 18:17:44 GMT
Jutland is a pain,I always feel that Battleship > Iron Clad No, it's because I don't have Kate. Or any navy, for that matter. I did it without a navy gen , I just put gens with navy stars or " navy " skills and used a kot of med kits
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Oct 4, 2016 18:27:08 GMT
Actually they do. GB Battleships have better output than German Ironclad. Prussian and Austrian navies are just crap(in original EW4). I always prefered Battleships, Ironclads are EXPENSIVE and I think they take more damage from forts I don't even like Battleships. Frigates are my favorite.
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Oct 4, 2016 18:27:33 GMT
I had (have) tirpitz
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Oct 4, 2016 19:14:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Oct 4, 2016 19:15:06 GMT
I always prefered Battleships, Ironclads are EXPENSIVE and I think they take more damage from forts I don't even like Battleships. Frigates are my favorite. They are more manouvarable,I used like 7 of them in 1855 Russia. For the Baltic Sea ,against the sweeds and they were very effective and I even had Economic problems I couldnt sustain that many fronts
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Oct 5, 2016 12:10:22 GMT
Update status: Now on HRE, Confed mission.
|
|