|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Oct 3, 2016 23:24:03 GMT
By the whole of the allies, your friendly CPU is useless while the enemies get buffed times ten. That will happen no matter who you play as, but Japan has the advantage of having few intimidating enemy generals around and being able to seize all lvl 2 airports with ease. Germany has to face Zhukov, Vatutin, Montgomery (not THAT weak in '39 because Air), Timoshenko (still intimidating), Govorov, and the Great Mountbatten. Japan has Halsey, MacArthur, and Peng D.H. to face off against |
|
|
|
Post by Paradoxstrategy on Oct 3, 2016 23:25:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Oct 3, 2016 23:30:55 GMT
The same could be said of any other country. |
|
|
|
Post by Paradoxstrategy on Oct 3, 2016 23:51:08 GMT
The same could be said of any other country. Especially japan |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Oct 3, 2016 23:53:49 GMT
The same could be said of any other country. Especially japan Not as much so as the Germans. Without Generals, the British and Russian spawns can push you back in early-mid game. Same for Japan by the American and Chinese spawns, except that China's big cities are much faster taken than London is. After the spawns are done and most are weakened, dying generals are no longer a big issue |
|
steven
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 6 
|
Post by steven on Oct 6, 2016 17:17:10 GMT
Hi guys, i would need help. Which country is easiest for conquest 1939? I'm new here, have lv12, 3 unnamed generals, crerar, hq lv - inf 3, art 3, tank 3, airplane 1, supply 3, others 0. I need save medals for badoglio and need 450 more, campaign is little bit hard, or maybe is easy but i don't understand properly technic of game yet, so i don't want always repeat what I've done for 10 steel and gold or whatever it is. Thanks for tips Thailand for 1*, Romania for 2* and USA for 3*. |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Oct 6, 2016 17:26:19 GMT
Hi guys, i would need help. Which country is easiest for conquest 1939? I'm new here, have lv12, 3 unnamed generals, crerar, hq lv - inf 3, art 3, tank 3, airplane 1, supply 3, others 0. I need save medals for badoglio and need 450 more, campaign is little bit hard, or maybe is easy but i don't understand properly technic of game yet, so i don't want always repeat what I've done for 10 steel and gold or whatever it is. Thanks for tips Thailand for 1*, Romania for 2* and USA for 3*. Japan is EASY in 1939, I had bad tech and still finished in 65 rounds. Finland is easy I only needed Bado to get Leningrad and Riga |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Oct 6, 2016 22:38:06 GMT
Paradoxstrategy , What Jean-Luc Picard has been saying is very much true. I can testify that Japan 1939 is extremely easy by comparison to every other choice or era. I can say it's number 1 easiest conquest to play in WC3 with a checklist. It's in the easiest era: 1939, check. It's on the advantaged side for the particular conquest: Axis, check. It starts with a larger country: has 3 stars, check. It starts with tons of generals available to you regardless of how many you have in your HQ: check check. It has a great group of starting generals for both water and land: Yamamoto, Yashimta, others, check check check. It starts with a relatively isolated position not so surrounded by enemies: check. It does have access to a large area readily available for conquest: China and SE Asia (including Phillipines), check. It faces the weak side of USSR instead of the strong side: Far East not Moscow, check. Same idea with other global powers on the enemy side: UK & France, check check. It has to fight less powerful generals spawned from USA in comparison to Europe: check. It does have easy access to set aside an aircraft carrier specifically to eventually kill Blamey in Brisbane: CHECK! So even going against Blamey is easiest for Japan than other Axis powers (which means the argument that Allies doesn't have to fight Blamey in 1939 is pointless, Axis is still easier). I should even add this checklist to my guide as an introduction... My short guide on this country and year: european-war-4.boards.net/thread/3907/guide-japan-1939
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Oct 6, 2016 23:01:24 GMT
The same could be said of any other country. Especially japan 1. Yamashita with some MIs can bring you an empty Moscow for European expansion. 2. Air kill Bai(sometimes he will have a duel with Yamaguchi in the ocean) and rest of ROC is easy, use Hata well so you can save Okamura, Umezu and Kuribayashi's health. 3. Itagaki and Koiso with naval support can land on America without threat, and Washington with no general in it is a piece of cake. 4. Taking American ports can keep yourself away from Spruance and Halsey. 5. MacArthur will leave Manila, take that city, MacArthur alone can do nothing. 6. Okamura should be capable of taking any city for African expansion, grab some MIs or Kuribayashi(Kuribayashi is really powerful here with his L General rank) if necessary. 7. With Nagano and Yamamoto, Brisbane is not that hard. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Oct 6, 2016 23:32:58 GMT
Hi guys, i would need help. Which country is easiest for conquest 1939? I'm new here, have lv12, 3 unnamed generals, crerar, hq lv - inf 3, art 3, tank 3, airplane 1, supply 3, others 0. I need save medals for badoglio and need 450 more, campaign is little bit hard, or maybe is easy but i don't understand properly technic of game yet, so i don't want always repeat what I've done for 10 steel and gold or whatever it is. Thanks for tips Thailand for 1*, Romania for 2* and USA for 3*. I disagree. USA needs to cross Oceans to reach enemies, and is on the weak side. Thailand has a weaker general, poorer econ, and less near allies than Finland Romania has to deal with Govorov, Spain does not |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Oct 7, 2016 17:55:03 GMT
Thailand for 1*, Romania for 2* and USA for 3*. I disagree. USA needs to cross Oceans to reach enemies, and is on the weak side. Thailand has a weaker general, poorer econ, and less near allies than Finland Romania has to deal with Govorov, Spain does not 1939 Japan *** / USSR Spain ** Finland * |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Oct 7, 2016 18:03:08 GMT
I disagree. USA needs to cross Oceans to reach enemies, and is on the weak side. Thailand has a weaker general, poorer econ, and less near allies than Finland Romania has to deal with Govorov, Spain does not 1939 Japan *** / USSR Spain ** Finland * USSR?! All their good gens (bar Govorov) are spawns, and they face Guderian and later Goring & Manstein |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Oct 7, 2016 18:32:30 GMT
1939 Japan *** / USSR Spain ** Finland * USSR?! All their good gens (bar Govorov) are spawns, and they face Guderian and later Goring & Manstein It was easy for me, and I wanted to point out easy 1939 Axis and Allies countries but cant think of any easy **and *. But USSR ia easier than UK or USA. But if anybody wants a speedrun its 1939 Japan |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Oct 7, 2016 18:43:27 GMT
USSR?! All their good gens (bar Govorov) are spawns, and they face Guderian and later Goring & Manstein It was easy for me, and I wanted to point out easy 1939 Axis and Allies countries but cant think of any easy **and *. But USSR ia easier than UK or USA. But if anybody wants a speedrun its 1939 Japan He asked for easy. Easy is Germany or Japan, rather than USSR |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Oct 7, 2016 18:57:19 GMT
1939 Japan *** / USSR Spain ** Finland * USSR?! All their good gens (bar Govorov) are spawns, and they face Guderian and later Goring & Manstein UK needs to face Erich von Manstein and Rommel though, but they have Montgomery. |
|
