|
|
Post by odm on Jan 29, 2017 19:00:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jan 29, 2017 20:07:07 GMT
I understand your concerns. But I prefer hard game exactly because it is hard, where mistakes and poor judgements could be costly, where there is no way back. It is very like a real life in some way... But of course it is a game after all, and it is not a game's purpose to be that realistic. But there is always remedy for a disease. You can always find a lot of mods (those make a life a lot easier, but I personaly think they kill the interest), if you have nothig against them... You didn't understand the idea. The idea is: I won't be able to upgrade Atilla, Blucher or Suleiman as I can't even upgrade my nowadays team. So in order to try all the content I need to spend 6 more month - and it is not playing - just stupid waiting. No thanks  It is not about difficulty, who said it is about difficulty. All easytech games are quite challenging, that's what we like it for. I think we should differentiate between tactical and strategical difficulty. I don't even dare to think, that anyone here could complain about tactical difficulty of the game :0) But what you have said, I think, is also about difficulty (but a strategic one). We all made some difficult choices, and we don't know, what could be, if we took another path. It is exciting to know, I agree, but the fact, that we could not do that (at least not easy enough) I personaly do not evaluate as a weakness. In some sense a player is more responsible for choices he makes as never before in ET games |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jan 29, 2017 20:24:02 GMT
It's just a game. Interesting, challenging but only a game, not life simulator There is nothing really difficult in it. And there is nothing difficult to make a strategic (as You call it) choice being a community forum member. What is really strange is that such a choice makes almost unavailable other quite interesting possibilities the game could propose. That's really sad. It is challenging game and of course it is interesting to test it all the way... In case I would like to start with new generals my progress will be much slower, as there is no more reward for campaigns. WC3 for example was proposing 3 times reward for each campaign mission. That would be great for EW5 - someone could use that medals for new generals, someone for further upgrade of the existing team (that would not make them OP anyway), so I think that there is something wrong with the system of medal earning when You need to wait for many month without even playing... |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jan 29, 2017 20:29:53 GMT
It's just a game. Interesting, challenging but only a game, not life simulator There is nothing really difficult in it. And there is nothing difficult to make a strategic (as You call it) choice being a community forum member. What is really strange is that such a choice makes almost unavailable other quite interesting possibilities the game could propose. That's really sad. It is challenging game and of course it is interesting to test it all the way... You can compare it to chess. You have made a move, and dozens other moves are left behind. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jan 29, 2017 20:32:16 GMT
It's just a game. Interesting, challenging but only a game, not life simulator There is nothing really difficult in it. And there is nothing difficult to make a strategic (as You call it) choice being a community forum member. What is really strange is that such a choice makes almost unavailable other quite interesting possibilities the game could propose. That's really sad. It is challenging game and of course it is interesting to test it all the way... You can compare it to chess. You have made a move, and dozens other moves are left behind. Yeah, and You can play it 5 times a day, without waiting half a year. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jan 29, 2017 20:38:02 GMT
You can compare it to chess. You have made a move, and dozens other moves are left behind. Yeah, and You can play it 5 times a day, without waiting half a year. Ok. That was cool :0) But as I said you can download a mod with unlimited amount of medals and enjoy it without waiting half a year :0) |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Feb 17, 2017 20:54:41 GMT
Singlemalt, if I may suggest an addition: the level needed to unlock a city would be great to have (spoken from Empire Age Jean-Luc Picard, looking for Lincoln)
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Feb 20, 2017 1:00:16 GMT
For the record, Ivory gets Lincoln 5%
|
|
|
|
Post by cardbattler on Mar 8, 2017 17:17:28 GMT
Just dropping info here.
Ivory gets Ayla 3% and Perfume 5%.
|
|
|
|
Post by cardbattler on Mar 13, 2017 9:12:07 GMT
Dropping some more info.
Ivory gets Jenny 50% and Diamond gets Xochitl 4%
|
|
|
|
Post by TK421 on Mar 27, 2017 19:19:00 GMT
We should add the mission medal gaps into this. Just a slight detail that fits this topic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Singlemalt on Mar 27, 2017 19:26:00 GMT
We should add the mission medal gaps into this. Just a slight detail that fits this topic. Just give the info |
|
|
|
Post by TK421 on Mar 27, 2017 19:30:05 GMT
We should add the mission medal gaps into this. Just a slight detail that fits this topic. Just give the info I've been noting it down, but I restarted a bit ago and am at the start of the empire age, again. lol. Give me another month or two  |
|
kingct
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 7 
|
Post by kingct on Apr 12, 2017 21:50:00 GMT
At what lvl do you get Bismarck?
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Apr 12, 2017 23:03:23 GMT
At what lvl do you get Bismarck? Lv70 |
|
