|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Nov 19, 2016 23:56:34 GMT
Rant incoming:
WTO is short for the World Trade Organization. That organization is a part of the UN, unaffiliated with the USSR and Communism, and utterly lacking any military forces.
The USSR and Communist allies were members of the Comintern, a non-military organization, and the Warsaw Pact, a NATO-like treaty.
Rant finished
|
|
|
|
WTO
Nov 20, 2016 5:59:41 GMT
via mobile
Post by Tito on Nov 20, 2016 5:59:41 GMT
Rant incoming: WTO is short for the World Trade Organization. That organization is a part of the UN, unaffiliated with the USSR and Communism, and utterly lacking any military forces. The USSR and Communist allies were members of the Comintern, a non-military organization, and the Warsaw Pact, a NATO-like treaty. Rant finished They probably usee it because NATO and WTO is short while Comintern and Warsaw-Pact couldnt fit over the country bubble |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Nov 20, 2016 6:06:10 GMT
Rant incoming: WTO is short for the World Trade Organization. That organization is a part of the UN, unaffiliated with the USSR and Communism, and utterly lacking any military forces. The USSR and Communist allies were members of the Comintern, a non-military organization, and the Warsaw Pact, a NATO-like treaty. Rant finished They probably usee it because NATO and WTO is short while Comintern and Warsaw-Pact couldnt fit over the country bubble It still makes zero sense to use WTO. They might as well use FBI and it would make no less sense |
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Nov 20, 2016 6:27:07 GMT
I didn't know what WTO was so I searched it in google and result that came up was World Trade Organization
I was like "what?"
|
|
|
|
WTO
Nov 20, 2016 7:17:03 GMT
Post by Tito on Nov 20, 2016 7:17:03 GMT
I didn't know what WTO was so I searched it in google and result that came up was World Trade Organization I was like "what?" same, I just thought it was Communist NATO until I researched Cold War |
|
|
|
WTO
Nov 20, 2016 7:38:47 GMT
Post by kanue on Nov 20, 2016 7:38:47 GMT
I have been wondering about that too but did not dare to look into it too much.
|
|
cweesy
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 10 
|
WTO
Nov 20, 2016 8:05:48 GMT
via mobile
NotU likes this
Post by cweesy on Nov 20, 2016 8:05:48 GMT
Warsaw Threaty Organisation = WTO
|
|
|
|
WTO
Nov 20, 2016 17:11:49 GMT
Tito likes this
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Nov 20, 2016 17:11:49 GMT
Warsaw Threaty Organisation = WTO Not actually, though. Maybe that's what Easytech thought, given their lack of historical knowledge. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 20, 2016 17:53:31 GMT
In China, Warsaw Pact is called 华沙条约组织. 华沙=Warsaw, 条约=Treaty/Pact, 组织=Organization. Therefore, Warsaw Treaty Organization=WTO.
BTW, both Warsaw Pact and Warsaw Treaty Organization work, but obviously Warsaw Pact is more widely used.
|
|
|
|
Post by Der Kaiserreich on Nov 21, 2016 1:43:01 GMT
They probably usee it because NATO and WTO is short while Comintern and Warsaw-Pact couldnt fit over the country bubble It still makes zero sense to use WTO. They might as well use FBI and it would make no less sense Thanks to Erich von Manstein, we know that it makes more sense to use WTO than FBI, or at least, to a Chinese. Maybe they could have used WP instead? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Nov 21, 2016 1:55:38 GMT
It still makes zero sense to use WTO. They might as well use FBI and it would make no less sense Thanks to Erich von Manstein, we know that it makes more sense to use WTO than FBI, or at least, to a Chinese. Maybe they could have used WP instead? Apparently WarPac was used by NATO to describe them. Maybe that? |
|
|
|
WTO
Nov 22, 2016 18:41:40 GMT
via mobile
Tito likes this
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2016 18:41:40 GMT
I learn about it in grade 12 last year
Cold war two sides Nato the western allies and WTO communist east
|
|
