|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Feb 8, 2017 19:03:19 GMT
We had about 0 expectation for EW5, but I think it came out to be pretty good. Rate it 1-10
1 being Parking Stars, 10 being a chocolate sundae (best)
|
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Feb 9, 2017 1:44:48 GMT
This is a smart poll, a very important question.
I gave a 9.
I think it did very well. Consider that GOG 2 and, I'm sorry to say, 3 kingdoms did so bad. EW5 could have very well continued this tradition, killing the brand.
Instead, I would rank it as one of the better Easy-Tech games.
While it departs in some respect from tradition, and is not perfect, I think it is a very good omen for the next game. That, is a very important question in deciding its worth.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Feb 9, 2017 1:48:29 GMT
I think we can only truly measure EW5 once WC4 comes out
If WC4 is successful, then EW5 fulfilled its duty as a test vehicle.
For now, it's a good game but imperfect. Which is fine, because ET are trying some new things
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Feb 9, 2017 3:22:02 GMT
Very good a 9
I would not have have played it as far if I did not enjoy playing EW5
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Feb 9, 2017 4:43:55 GMT
Is there a zero anywhere by chance? Because that's what I would rate it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Feb 9, 2017 10:31:03 GMT
Is there a zero anywhere by chance? Because that's what I would rate it. Why? |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Feb 9, 2017 10:45:33 GMT
Is there a zero anywhere by chance? Because that's what I would rate it. Why? well it's because I don't like it at all |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Feb 9, 2017 12:35:43 GMT
well it's because I don't like it at all Yes I know that I'm asking why don't you like it? The graphics aren't good but everybody gets used to them. The gameplay is alright. The only problem I have is the ridiculous literature grind. I highly doubt I'll ever get into Gunpowder age much less Industrial. |
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Feb 9, 2017 12:38:27 GMT
well it's because I don't like it at all I assume you actually played it? (Not for very long, if you don't like it, obviously) |
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Feb 9, 2017 12:40:01 GMT
well it's because I don't like it at all Yes I know that I'm asking why don't you like it? The graphics aren't good but everybody gets used to them. The gameplay is alright. The only problem I have is the ridiculous literature grind. I highly doubt I'll ever get into Gunpowder age much less Industrial. Take your time, my friend. I made it into gunpowder. Now I have 250 Literature...need over 900. Taking it slow now, just collecting medals. Try the campaign from time to time. Oh, and I'm working on a conquest. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Feb 9, 2017 12:44:12 GMT
well it's because I don't like it at all I assume you actually played it? (Not for very long, if you don't like it, obviously) 4 or 5 days, it was more of a disappointment to me. I think everyone has their own opinion. Some might say 10 some might say 0 and they could be the minority. |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Feb 9, 2017 13:57:50 GMT
I assume you actually played it? (Not for very long, if you don't like it, obviously) 4 or 5 days, it was more of a disappointment to me. I think everyone has their own opinion. Some might say 10 some might say 0 and they could be the minority. Theres nothing wrong with having a different opinion. The game is boring af when tou first start out but it gets fun after Empire |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Feb 9, 2017 14:10:07 GMT
Yes I know that I'm asking why don't you like it? The graphics aren't good but everybody gets used to them. The gameplay is alright. The only problem I have is the ridiculous literature grind. I highly doubt I'll ever get into Gunpowder age much less Industrial. Take your time, my friend. I made it into gunpowder. Now I have 250 Literature...need over 900. Taking it slow now, just collecting medals. Try the campaign from time to time. Oh, and I'm working on a conquest. Nah I've already gotten burned out from the game due to the amount of repeating conquests over and over. So when I say it's unlikely I'll ever progress, I mean it's almost a certainty. I've beaten all of the Discovery campaigns with three stars so there isn't much to play for besides the satisfaction of winning. But how can I be happy when I get 600 literature when I know I need 900 more after that? It's silly. |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Feb 9, 2017 14:27:45 GMT
Take your time, my friend. I made it into gunpowder. Now I have 250 Literature...need over 900. Taking it slow now, just collecting medals. Try the campaign from time to time. Oh, and I'm working on a conquest. Nah I've already gotten burned out from the game due to the amount of repeating conquests over and over. So when I say it's unlikely I'll ever progress, I mean it's almost a certainty. I've beaten all of the Discovery campaigns with three stars so there isn't much to play for besides the satisfaction of winning. But how can I be happy when I get 600 literature when I know I need 900 more after that? It's silly. Two words Time Machine |
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Feb 9, 2017 14:51:47 GMT
Take your time, my friend. I made it into gunpowder. Now I have 250 Literature...need over 900. Taking it slow now, just collecting medals. Try the campaign from time to time. Oh, and I'm working on a conquest. Nah I've already gotten burned out from the game due to the amount of repeating conquests over and over. So when I say it's unlikely I'll ever progress, I mean it's almost a certainty. I've beaten all of the Discovery campaigns with three stars so there isn't much to play for besides the satisfaction of winning. But how can I be happy when I get 600 literature when I know I need 900 more after that? It's silly. The Daily missions give 1 literature (7 total At where I am) but of course that takes a long time. (so does medal grinding though  , not as bad as other ET games TBF) |
|
, not as bad as other ET games TBF) 
