|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Feb 9, 2017 19:32:26 GMT
Nah I've already gotten burned out from the game due to the amount of repeating conquests over and over. So when I say it's unlikely I'll ever progress, I mean it's almost a certainty. I've beaten all of the Discovery campaigns with three stars so there isn't much to play for besides the satisfaction of winning. But how can I be happy when I get 600 literature when I know I need 900 more after that? It's silly. The Daily missions give 1 literature (7 total At where I am) but of course that takes a long time. (so does medal grinding though  , not as bad as other ET games TBF) I think the medal grind is easiest in WC3. Generals are more expensive than the ones in EW4 though. |
|
|
|
Post by wilbur2016 on Feb 16, 2017 4:50:11 GMT
I rated a 9, pro: love the gameplay, like LOVE it (if I had a girlfriend, I would dump her to marry it, jk, depends on the girl, but that's a whole different topic), I like the traveling through different eras thing, and I like city sieges. Con: the conquest, I hate the city to city thing vs the territory style of WC3 and EW4 (which is really the only thing I like about EW4, I hated it, sorry to say, it never sucked me into it like the other Easytech games), and I don't like I literature grinding, workable, but a pain in the @$#...
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Feb 16, 2017 5:28:24 GMT
7 points.
According to Easytech, Goths, Poland, Magyars, NA tribes, and Thailand didn't exist, Vikings and Scandinavians are interchangeable, and the Huns existed until late medieval. Carthage existing as a space-filling empire was the last straw.
At least add the Volkswanderung!
The maps were smart though; notice faint outlines of continents in campaign scenarios?
Edit: Easytech nerf archers plox
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Feb 16, 2017 15:48:52 GMT
I can give 9
Obvious strength:
Conection between strategy and tactics like never before in ET games. 3 Skills and 2 unit's abilities of each general and theirs interrelation are of high importance. It makes player more responsible for strategic choice he makes. Different tactical approaches are possible and valid.
Weakness or let me say some weak points:
1. The gap between good and bad generals is big again. I think it could be narrow for the sake of interest.
2. If we upgrade generals, I do not understand why we could not determine their skills like in wc3.
3. It is a long game without any doubt. Collecting such amount of literatures is very annoying indeed. All autoconquests to recive another minor portion are a waste of time, that not anyone could tolerate.
|
|
, not as bad as other ET games TBF) 
