|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Feb 12, 2017 17:30:44 GMT
As per the incredingly long title,
If you were able/had the time to mod. Which easytech game would you pick, would you want to make a mod of wc3, ew4, or any other title of easytech.
I, most likely, wouldve chosen for either ew4 or ew3.
I personally like wc3 more, but i think ew4 has a broader potention when it comes to modding.
Or i would go for ew3(/wc2) because i would love to see a new province based game for easytech and this is not so commonly mod, so you make something more unique
|
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Feb 12, 2017 19:05:52 GMT
I would definitely choose EW5, though I don't know if it will ever be possible.
I would add Sweden and make the Viking/Denmark conquests go:
Viking/Denmark/Sweden/Denmark/Denmark. Sweden would have Riga in addition to the normal 2 cities, and would be at war with Russia and Poland. General is Carolus Rex.
I would add Poland. I've given a bit of thought to it.
Conquest: Medieval 1 star, 4 cities. Empire 2 star, 6 cities. In gunpowder, 1 star, 3 cities, at war with Germany, Austria, Russia, Allied with France.
Add Generals: Vytautas the Great, Lithuanian Arty general, medieval.
Sobeski, Cavalry general, empire.
Kosciuzko, Infantry General, Discovery, appears in Gunpowder conquest.
Polish Campaign would be a mix of three eras. In Medieval, Vytautas the Great would fight the Teutonic order.
In Empire, Jan III Sobeski fights the Ottomans with the help of Barbarossa (based on battle of Vienna, have to protect the city)
In Discovery, Kosciuszko tries to defend Poland from partition. Enemy generals are Catherine, Blucher, Barbarossa, maybe Conrad.
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Feb 13, 2017 3:52:10 GMT
I would add one more era to the EW5 campaign mode
This era would be set WW2 and cold war
New era means new units and upgrade for generals.
Campaigns would be
British WW2 campaign lead by Montgomery
German WW2 campaign lead by Manstein
Communist China Pre-WW2 to cold war campaign led by Peng Dehuai
USA cold war campaign led by Eisenhower
Soviet Union Cold war campaign led by Khrushchev
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 23:00:34 GMT
EW4 since you can change the mod into a different era.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Feb 13, 2017 23:38:34 GMT
EW4 since you can change the mod into a different era. You can do that with any game you mod, in theory |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2017 0:39:09 GMT
EW4 since you can change the mod into a different era. You can do that with any game you mod, in theory But EW4 is more easy plus Europe map is bigger that why we pick EW4 |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Feb 14, 2017 0:40:26 GMT
You can do that with any game you mod, in theory But EW4 is more easy plus Europe map is bigger that why we pick EW4 This poll isn't about easy, it's about what the non-modders wish they could learn and do |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Feb 15, 2017 3:27:43 GMT
EW4. Thirty years war+English Civil War + Deluge, 18th century, Mediaeval...
|
|
|
|
Post by Der Kaiserreich on Feb 15, 2017 13:01:09 GMT
EW5, simply because it needs modding.
Otherwise EW4.
|
|
|
|
Post by Der Kaiserreich on Feb 15, 2017 13:14:34 GMT
EW5, simply because it needs modding. Otherwise EW4. To go in to more detail; I'd edit the ages, so it's more accurate. E.g. Classical-Medieval-Empire(I can't think of anything better)-Gunpowder-Enlightenment-Industrial I'll also add some generals and edit general stats and unit commanding. E.g. Add Vercingteriox, make Leonidas better and change Alexander to calvary. Then edit the conquest map, of course. E.g. add Gauls and Rus in classical. |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Feb 15, 2017 13:18:07 GMT
EW5, simply because it needs modding. Otherwise EW4. To go in to more detail; I'd edit the ages, so it's more accurate. E.g. Classical-Medieval-Empire(I can't think of anything better)-Gunpowder-Enlightenment-Industrial I'll also add some generals and edit general stats and unit commanding. E.g. Add Vercingteriox, make Leonidas better and change Alexander to calvary. Then edit the conquest map, of course. E.g. add Gauls and Rus in classical. The nords founded Rus in the Medieval ages... |
|
|
|
Post by Der Kaiserreich on Feb 16, 2017 4:08:26 GMT
To go in to more detail; I'd edit the ages, so it's more accurate. E.g. Classical-Medieval-Empire(I can't think of anything better)-Gunpowder-Enlightenment-Industrial I'll also add some generals and edit general stats and unit commanding. E.g. Add Vercingteriox, make Leonidas better and change Alexander to calvary. Then edit the conquest map, of course. E.g. add Gauls and Rus in classical. The nords founded Rus in the Medieval ages... So... what do I call them Classical Age Russians? |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Feb 16, 2017 5:36:05 GMT
The nords founded Rus in the Medieval ages... So... what do I call them Classical Age Russians? ... Veneti (tribe in Eastern Europe that have been suggested to be a branch of what may be the slavs)? I don't know, and the Goths would fit the era more *cough*Alaric*cough* Edit: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vistula_Veneti |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Feb 16, 2017 10:02:38 GMT
The nords founded Rus in the Medieval ages... So... what do I call them Classical Age Russians? Scythians, Dacians, Or even just Slavs. There were alot of proto-russian tribes |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Feb 16, 2017 10:44:02 GMT
Scythians and Dacians have little to do with Slavs, I’m afraid. Scythians were Iranian speaking people disappeared largely by the 1st century. They could have some ethnic relation to certain Caucasian tribes, Ossetians for example. Dacians could be ancestors of modern Romanians, but also could be well exterminated by Romans and replaced totally by roman colonists. The problem is not solved until now. Russian ancestors are a combination of Nordic and Slavonic tribes alongside trade route from the Varangians to the Greeks (again two main theories 1. with significant Varangians influence 2. predominantly Slavonic Ethnogenesis).
|
|
