|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2017 5:05:34 GMT
Will it also include moon conquest as ww2 nation like another reality. Like This-
.org/image/u98rzavkl/]  [/url] |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2017 5:22:25 GMT
GoG Two had Antarctica being occupied by the Germans. I guess in the next one they can add the moon (maybe even Mars?)
|
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Mar 22, 2017 5:22:42 GMT
What WOULD you like? BTW, EW3 was about world war 1. WC2 is about world war 2 and cold war. I have it on my laptop, can confirm. Hmm... WC2-world war 2/cold war WC3-World war 2/cold war aliensI hated the aliens and I hope they don't do them again. I wish they made in EW5 aliens like war of the worlds (original British version, not crap American reboot) Can China into copyright? Well, other than that your opinion is very reasonable. Aliens are very controversial. |
|
|
|
Post by Yi Sun Sin on Mar 22, 2017 5:31:01 GMT
GoG Two had Antarctica being occupied by the Germans. I guess in the next one they can add the moon (maybe even Mars?) Gog original too actually. .org/image/8l0hl5y8h/]  [/url] |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 22, 2017 5:39:53 GMT
I wait WC4's campaign is based on 17th century or 16th century because I don't want modern units , unrealsitic maps and modern generals. I want WC4 have a map like Ew4. These are I wants to in WC4. (I don't know sure WC4 is come out, I need more info for existence of WC4) A game titled World Conqueror 4 will come out regardless if it's soon or not. Even if it's not coming out this year, if it comes out in 2019, it will be coming out long as Easytech doesn't goes out of business. The only thing we are wondering is... Is it soon? |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 22, 2017 5:46:26 GMT
Why is Gregorian Calendar a thing? All it does is confuse. 17th century = 1600s, why though? I first thought that it was because the Gregorian calendar, which gave birth to the secularly termed version (identical math) reckons years by the traditional date of the birth of Jesus, and 1 BC is followed by 1 AD-there is no 0. Apparently thats not the reason. Huh. Actually it is (for a couple of years at each century's beginning/end) lol. I jest, I jest... But yeah, you're right... it's about numbering each century incrementally from a point of origin (regardless if it's at 0 or 1 or anywhere else).
To others, basically 001 to 100 is 1st century, 101 to 200 is 2nd century, so the years in the 100s are mostly in 2nd century. Even if the start is at 0 instead of 1... 000 to 099 is 100 years, thus the 1st century, and so then 100 to 199 is 2nd century, SO... all of the years in the 100s are in the 2nd century which sounds confusing at first. |
|
|
|
Post by Orion Pax on Mar 22, 2017 8:22:59 GMT
I saw a post on baidu which stated (by g translate) conqueror of world 4 to be next project of easy
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2017 9:16:18 GMT
I saw a post on baidu which stated (by g translate) conqueror of world 4 to be next project of easy Conquerer of world 4 (wow, name changed eh?  ) To be next project of easy (yeah, we gonna wreck history even more). Easytech is at its finest! |
|
|
|
Post by Thrawn on Mar 22, 2017 9:35:16 GMT
This is too good news but any source?
|
|
|
|
Post by saltin on Mar 22, 2017 9:38:02 GMT
What ever theme they want to do with WC4.
What ever era they want to cover with WC4.
Just....
No more cartoons!
Seriously we are good, same gfx as WC3 or EW4 or any of the GoG would be just fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thrawn on Mar 22, 2017 9:42:16 GMT
What ever theme they want to do with WC4. What ever era they want to cover with WC4. Just.... No more cartoons!
Seriously we are good, same gfx as WC3 or EW4 or any of the GoG would be just fine. Admin, I agree with you. |
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Mar 22, 2017 9:43:08 GMT
EW5 was great, for both cartoon and stupid mobile friendly map. (The generals come alive!)
But yeah. Let that be their mobile cash grab/cartoon peak.
Be nice if "conqueror of world 4" was just an upgraded WC3 IMO. No aliens preferably, Victorian tripods aren't realistic anyway (for 1940 or higher)
|
|
|
|
Post by Thrawn on Mar 22, 2017 9:48:28 GMT
EW5 was great, for both cartoon and stupid mobile friendly map. (The generals come alive!) But yeah. Let that be their mobile cash grab/cartoon peak. Be nice if "conqueror of world 4" was just an upgraded WC3 IMO. No aliens preferably, Victorian tripods aren't realistic anyway (for 1940 or higher) In EW5, seeing the generals in the unit they command themselves is actually kinda cool, I admit. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2017 10:01:42 GMT
What ever theme they want to do with WC4. What ever era they want to cover with WC4. Just.... No more cartoons!
Seriously we are good, same gfx as WC3 or EW4 or any of the GoG would be just fine. agreed 100% |
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Mar 22, 2017 10:06:22 GMT
EW5 was great, for both cartoon and stupid mobile friendly map. (The generals come alive!) But yeah. Let that be their mobile cash grab/cartoon peak. Be nice if "conqueror of world 4" was just an upgraded WC3 IMO. No aliens preferably, Victorian tripods aren't realistic anyway (for 1940 or higher) In EW5, seeing the generals in the unit they command themselves is actually kinda cool, I admit. I believe the units themselves have unparalleled actions. the riflemen in Catherine's unit all good boys. Clean rifle, be ready fight for Tzar-Queen of Russia (forget the Russian term) I can kinda see one complaint, that realistically there would be tens of thousands of riflemen per Catherine. But if that is your problem, well Easy-Tech has always shown few troops. |
|
) To be next project of easy (yeah, we gonna wreck history even more).
