|
Post by ondercm on Mar 26, 2017 16:18:04 GMT
Can someone share a photo of general ranking without items ?
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Mar 26, 2017 16:33:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ondercm on Mar 26, 2017 16:38:25 GMT
Yeah I know but I want to know who is the best general without items and if we don't care about skills
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Mar 26, 2017 16:43:24 GMT
That's an interesting question.
Just stopped using my paladin set on Alexander lol. Wonder what his contribution will be now.
|
|
|
Post by ondercm on Mar 26, 2017 16:52:08 GMT
I just want to see which general's stats are really better at the same level.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2017 17:32:14 GMT
Depends what General max generals are in the thread info on all generals lv6.
|
|
|
Post by ondercm on Mar 26, 2017 18:01:27 GMT
.org/image/yompdzqmf/] [/url] I guess I found it. Is it true ? Caesar - Suleiman - - Attila - Alexander - Saladin - Barbarossa - Li Shimin - Charlemagne
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Mar 26, 2017 18:04:13 GMT
I'm supposed to believe Barbarossa beats Li Shimin?
I wonder if all of their generals have no items equipped, or if they are switching them around so its not accurate. Probably no items.
Well, Suleiman at 2nd rank just goes to show the circle ranking is not always accurate.
|
|
|
Post by ondercm on Mar 26, 2017 18:14:39 GMT
Who is 3rd?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2017 18:16:34 GMT
Blucher
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2017 18:17:45 GMT
Blucher
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Mar 26, 2017 18:18:32 GMT
If you are speaking to me, I mean the top generals in the circle ranking you just posted.
Blucher is third on the ranking you have there. I don't think he is as good as Atilla, but whatever.
Thats actually kinda interesting. In that line-up most of the top generals are Cavalry. I wonder if thats actually true.
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Mar 26, 2017 18:19:59 GMT
I guess I found it. Is it true ? Caesar - Suleiman - - Attila - Alexander - Saladin - Barbarossa - Li Shimin - Charlemagne Yes... That is. But AI's ranking is a strange thing. Obvious example - Nobunaga. He is between Kath and Robin :-):-):-) I think it is enough to understand how unreliable those rankins are.
|
|
|
Post by TK421 on Mar 26, 2017 18:29:12 GMT
I guess I found it. Is it true ? Caesar - Suleiman - - Attila - Alexander - Saladin - Barbarossa - Li Shimin - Charlemagne Yes... That is. But AI's ranking is a strange thing. Obvious example - Nobunaga. He is between Kath and Robin :-):-):-) I think it is enough to understand how unreliable those rankins are. No to mention that it really depends on your line-up...For a cav line-up, Caesar is obviously not #1, at all.
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Mar 26, 2017 18:45:51 GMT
AI's ranking is like an "average temperature of patients in the hospital" :-) That is not informative at all...
|
|