|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on May 29, 2017 22:20:59 GMT
Wilhuff Tarkin have my points been added or is the leaderboard only the top three? Top 3 Well I understand that the top 3 are the ones who win... I assume you are at least keeping track in case Polen gets up into the ranking? BTW I'm trying the USSR challenge in 1960 with Bai lol. Using same strategy as before, wonder if the danger of attacking Brazil is the Americans gaining the nukes (missiles mostly) in Dominican, as I believe air power is taking a toll on my troops. If I don't succeed, perhaps instead my strategy should be directly attacking Europe from turn 1 with all my generals. Bagramyan is currently resting in Arabia while the rest march on Brazil. Polenbal , your team sounds dangerous. I was planning Bai who I have (good) Zhu D. (bad choice, though I'm thinking 230 health -1200 medals INF general might be good for challenges) and Devers. (fast and plainy but low health and not super developed) Should at least swap Devers for Vatutin if your generals are so good. Might beat my challenge score  |
|
|
|
Post by Polenbal on May 30, 2017 8:54:15 GMT
Still working for them doing a 1939 Italy conquest already at England and have taken Africa and arabia
|
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on May 30, 2017 16:33:34 GMT
Still working for them doing a 1939 Italy conquest already at England and have taken Africa and arabia I find doing 1960 as a...NATO country is a easy way to get hundreds of medals. (note-those against the USSR) Would be nice if you got 3rd in rank, because then his mod would have Polandball and ByzantineBall as generals. Of course then Harambe is beaten out. Edit: I better do the Canadian challenges when I'm not busy. |
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Santa Anna on May 30, 2017 17:12:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Wilhuff Tarkin on May 30, 2017 17:20:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Polenbal on May 30, 2017 17:22:26 GMT
looks great! will you add Communist china and a civil war scenario? |
|
|
|
Post by Wilhuff Tarkin on May 30, 2017 17:34:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Polenbal on May 30, 2017 18:08:00 GMT
also is there an eta of the public V4.0 of CSA? |
|
|
|
Post by Wilhuff Tarkin on May 30, 2017 18:09:41 GMT
also is there an eta of the public V4.0 of CSA? You mean 1.9? I have most of it done, just a few things to still work out. |
|
|
|
Post by Polenbal on May 30, 2017 18:12:11 GMT
also is there an eta of the public V4.0 of CSA? You mean 1.9? I have most of it done, just a few things to still work out. I thought... Oh wait thats the enterprise mod I have too many mods on my kindle |
|
|
|
Post by Wilhuff Tarkin on May 30, 2017 18:15:19 GMT
You mean 1.9? I have most of it done, just a few things to still work out. I thought... Oh wait thats the enterprise mod I have too many mods on my kindle Well, lets just say you might wanna free up spaceon your kindle in 2 weeks.... |
|
|
|
Post by Polenbal on May 30, 2017 18:17:41 GMT
.org/image/3tdn6j9mr/]  [/url] The spain one can't remember also would an Italian one of the same challenge work .org/image/kdy0yvblr/]  [/url] |
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Santa Anna on May 30, 2017 21:07:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Polenbal on May 30, 2017 21:09:24 GMT
I can see three generals that aren't American gens in the 60 scenario |
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Santa Anna on May 30, 2017 21:12:10 GMT
I can see three generals that aren't American gens in the 60 scenario They were already under my control. America controls most of Russia and Scandinavia in this conquest, so I had a few Russian generals to begin with (and the Norwegian general and Swedish commander, too). |
|
