|
|
Post by Louis-Alexandre Berthier on Aug 10, 2017 1:25:06 GMT
Am I alone in my love of artillery?
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 10, 2017 1:44:46 GMT
Am I alone in my love of artillery? Arty is cool, but I'm always a cavalry-lover, as judged from my overuse of horsemen and cavalrymen when playing Loys in Wesnoth XD |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Aug 10, 2017 2:38:28 GMT
Am I alone in my love of artillery? I did vote for light arty first, does that count? |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Aug 10, 2017 10:41:25 GMT
I like light artillery. It looks good, it moves fast, and I swear Isabella does more damage on it than heavy artillery.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Aug 10, 2017 10:44:54 GMT
I like light artillery. It looks good, it moves fast, and I swear Isabella does more damage on it than heavy artillery. Heavy arty is some sense feels like a tank. Slow and steady but packs a punch, until it gets blown up. Light arty is like armoured cars, good for hit-&-run actions but easily destroyed. Still, maybe it's terrain or luck? Terrain somwhow decrease dmg dealt and bad luck can drop a low-end double digit dmg to low-end single digit dmg. |
|
|
|
Post by Leon the Napoleon on Aug 10, 2017 10:50:25 GMT
When I went to vote I was divided between light arty and guards cav. Then I remembered every I put Golitsyn on cav and then voted immidiately
|
|
Big Mac
First Lieutenant
Sometimes I Haiku. It Gets Very Extremely Hard. I do it Anyway
Posts: 22 
|
Post by Big Mac on Aug 11, 2017 3:37:12 GMT
Armoured Car!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It murders the competition.
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 11, 2017 3:46:28 GMT
Armoured Car!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It murders the competition. Quoting Budyonny: "Cav > Tanks and Cars" |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 14, 2017 10:20:29 GMT
My Favourite units are The Heavy Artillery unit and the Guards Unit. Especially as Prussia or the Ottomans. Prussia has a high dammage rate for Heavy Artillery and the ottomans have it both for Heavy (and siege) Artillery and Guards
|
|
|
|
Post by Leonid Govorov on Aug 26, 2017 2:23:53 GMT
U forgot mgun which makes any inf gen look good
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Aug 26, 2017 2:46:22 GMT
U forgot mgun which makes any inf gen look good Yeah but it's slow. You NEED a good inf gen that has stars in movement. |
|
|
|
Post by Leonid Govorov on Aug 26, 2017 3:11:09 GMT
U forgot mgun which makes any inf gen look good Yeah but it's slow. You NEED a good inf gen that has stars in movement. dont think an mgun will live enough to march a long way... |
|
|
|
Post by Louis-Alexandre Berthier on Aug 26, 2017 12:26:11 GMT
Yeah but it's slow. You NEED a good inf gen that has stars in movement. dont think an mgun will live enough to march a long way... It's real worth is found in a small campaign map- impossible for rushing in conquest with it. |
|
|
|
Post by Conrad von Hotzendorf on Aug 30, 2017 13:50:17 GMT
Unless I need an effective unit to defend a city from weak infantry I will always take guards over a machine gun. I prefer the movement and health over the higher damage cause with a good general the damage is roughly the same
|
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Luna on Sept 8, 2017 10:20:58 GMT
Armored car for me, because an assault art empowered hail of bullets from a mobile mounted machine gun being used by Lan with two pistols is just awesome.
|
|
.jpg)
