World Conqueror 4 video is out!
Aug 16, 2017 11:51:09 GMT
via mobile
Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb likes this
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Aug 16, 2017 11:51:09 GMT
If allies can give resources to enemies and cause defection, what if Nazi Germany give resources and seduces 1 of your few remaining allies.
If USA in CWE seduces PRC &/or Poland in Mid-Game, how would you feel if you were USSR in such a scenario?
I don't think this system of giving enemies resources to cause a defection should be in place. However, a surrender diplomacy option sounds good.
If anyone played EW5 & Samurai Warriors 2: Empires, you know how smoothly how my suggested diplomacy system works.
You can force enemies into unconditional surrender, ONLY if they are surrounded, lacking the ability to make much resistance and weaker than you.
In EW5, this surrender system applies when taking CAPITALS. This allows easy end-game mop ups: Just march into their capital(s) and force a surrender.
Surrendering is a realistic option and would be very good if ONLY used this way cuz you don't want your USSRs and USAs just forcing surrenders on turn 1 to 10.
If USA in CWE seduces PRC &/or Poland in Mid-Game, how would you feel if you were USSR in such a scenario?
I don't think this system of giving enemies resources to cause a defection should be in place. However, a surrender diplomacy option sounds good.
If anyone played EW5 & Samurai Warriors 2: Empires, you know how smoothly how my suggested diplomacy system works.
You can force enemies into unconditional surrender, ONLY if they are surrounded, lacking the ability to make much resistance and weaker than you.
In EW5, this surrender system applies when taking CAPITALS. This allows easy end-game mop ups: Just march into their capital(s) and force a surrender.
Surrendering is a realistic option and would be very good if ONLY used this way cuz you don't want your USSRs and USAs just forcing surrenders on turn 1 to 10.
