|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Oct 7, 2017 17:55:18 GMT
 AIM,AOL first instant messages service is shutting on December 25th down after like 20 years. Like so many other internet stars of the past it shined bright in its prime and was a giant of its time but is now eclipsed by the new comers like Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ECT.. Actually it came to windows by 1997 and it already existed for some time before that, I think it was originally released beta for dos in 1994beta, but I neither remember, nor can find. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 7, 2017 18:08:51 GMT
AIM,AOL first instant messages service is shutting on December 25th down after like 20 years. Like so many other internet stars of the past it shined bright in its prime and was a giant of it's time but is now eclipsed by the new comers like Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ECT.. Actually it came to windows by 1997 and it already existed for some time before that, I think it was originally released beta for dos in 1994beta, but I neither remember, nor can find. Have you seen or heard of the show Adam Ruins Everything? |
|
|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Oct 7, 2017 20:11:48 GMT
Actually it came to windows by 1997 and it already existed for some time before that, I think it was originally released beta for dos in 1994beta, but I neither remember, nor can find. Have you seen or heard of the show Adam Ruins Everything? Yeah know that one |
|
|
|
Post by Saltin on Oct 7, 2017 22:41:19 GMT
Mountbatten you must have an insider knowledge with the folks at dictionary.com , I just checked them out and made this amazing Nobel prize contender discovery:  So then it must mean the word [like] is not meant to be expertly precise and therefore wouldn't need a formal correction or a "let's ruin a post" drive by shooting as the case maybe? This is great, let's spread this amazing scientific breakthrough! Ahh ...the hilarity, thanks for that  Speaking of spreading knowledge: does everyone know that if you search in Google for the expression : [ruins everything] you would be flooded with lots of entries with [Adam ruins everything] ? but say you wanted results other than the flood of Adam results? The solution to this is the - sign to eliminate "Adam" from the results. So in this case the better search typed in the Google bar would be: Ruins everything -adam This would return everything Google has on ruining everything that does not involve Adam. Pretty neat hey? The other side of the coin: the reverse procedure works too, for example if you wanted to force the search engine to include the keyword money as in [money ruins everything ] you would search for: ruins everything +money
|
|
|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Oct 7, 2017 23:38:20 GMT
Mountbatten you must have an insider knowledge with the folks at dictionary.com , I just checked them out and made this amazing Nobel prize contender discovery: So then it must mean the word [like] is not meant to be expertly precise and therefore wouldn't need a formal correction or a "let's ruin a post" drive by shooting as the case maybe? This is great, let's spread this amazing scientific breakthrough! Ahh ...the hilarity, thanks for that Speaking of spreading knowledge: does everyone know that if you search in Google for the expression : [ruins everything] you would be flooded with lots of entries with [Adam ruins everything] ? but say you wanted results other than the flood of Adam results? The solution to this is the - sign to eliminate "Adam" from the results. So in this case the better search typed in the Google bar would be: Ruins everything -adam This would return everything Google has on ruining everything that does not involve Adam. Pretty neat hey? The other side of the coin: the reverse procedure works too, for example if you wanted to force the search engine to include the keyword money as in [money ruins everything ] you would search for: ruins everything +money Eh basic googling skills huh, people actually should learn those things as it gives you much higher possibility to find what you need |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 8, 2017 0:02:55 GMT
Mountbatten you must have an insider knowledge with the folks at dictionary.com , I just checked them out and made this amazing Nobel prize contender discovery: So then it must mean the word [like] is not meant to be expertly precise and therefore wouldn't need a formal correction or a "let's ruin a post" drive by shooting as the case maybe? This is great, let's spread this amazing scientific breakthrough! Ahh ...the hilarity, thanks for that Speaking of spreading knowledge: does everyone know that if you search in Google for the expression : [ruins everything] you would be flooded with lots of entries with [Adam ruins everything] ? but say you wanted results other than the flood of Adam results? The solution to this is the - sign to eliminate "Adam" from the results. So in this case the better search typed in the Google bar would be: Ruins everything -adam This would return everything Google has on ruining everything that does not involve Adam. Pretty neat hey? The other side of the coin: the reverse procedure works too, for example if you wanted to force the search engine to include the keyword money as in [money ruins everything ] you would search for: ruins everything +money Lol I don't understand half of what you are saying but I feel like we are on the same wavelength  |
|
|
|
Post by lassalle on Oct 8, 2017 3:58:52 GMT
 Pic originally posted on Reddit.That's the Netherlands in Tulip season. Beats factory smoke stacks. |
|
|
|
Post by Hobo Joe on Oct 8, 2017 20:54:12 GMT
The Light Bringer any clue what the tencent_stub file in WC4 is? I think the tamper protection it has is signature based I'm trying to find the scanner
|
|
|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Oct 8, 2017 21:01:45 GMT
The Light Bringer any clue what the tencent_stub file in WC4 is? I think the tamper protection it has is signature based I'm trying to find the scanner It looks like a decription key, but I have no idea what decription method they use, so I can't try decrypting the ciphred(and don't have the rig) files without method as there are thousands of them😬 |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2017 0:07:43 GMT
The Light Bringer any clue what the tencent_stub file in WC4 is? I think the tamper protection it has is signature based I'm trying to find the scanner i wanna crack it to make it so we can mod it but i have no idea how. |
|
|
|
Post by lassalle on Oct 9, 2017 0:20:07 GMT
Blade Runner 2049 looking terrific but apparently a "disappointment" at the box office because it only made over $50 million over the weekend, specifically a low $31 million in the US market. Greedy bastages is what I think Great movie making a fortune in just a couple days of screening but nope ...try again, not good enough. Source: Blade Runner 2049
|
|
|
|
Post by Hobo Joe on Oct 9, 2017 1:16:56 GMT
The Light Bringer any clue what the tencent_stub file in WC4 is? I think the tamper protection it has is signature based I'm trying to find the scanner It looks like a decription key, but I have no idea what decription method they use, so I can't try decrypting the ciphred(and don't have the rig) files without method as there are thousands of them😬 I could always just use a brute force program |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2017 2:43:14 GMT
It looks like a decription key, but I have no idea what decription method they use, so I can't try decrypting the ciphred(and don't have the rig) files without method as there are thousands of them😬 I could always just use a brute force program My version (hockey version) take my helmet off, roll up my sleves take my gloves off and you know what happen next🏒 Any tool i can use to crack the decrypting? |
|
|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Oct 9, 2017 3:54:33 GMT
It looks like a decription key, but I have no idea what decription method they use, so I can't try decrypting the ciphred(and don't have the rig) files without method as there are thousands of them😬 I could always just use a brute force program Yeah sure you can, but it is going to take 3-5 months on good rig by my estimate and on my current PC it would take more than a year lol |
|
|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Oct 9, 2017 3:59:58 GMT
I could always just use a brute force program My version (hockey version) take my helmet off, roll up my sleves take my gloves off and you know what happen next🏒 Any tool i can use to crack the decrypting? Actually you have to check around in forums like alpha gamers to find latest cracking applications, when you find one try to decipher, if this app can't do that search for next also btw trying to do it on phone is nearly waste of time, while phone would take 10-20words per minute(because of limited power access), PC would take 150-1500 words per minute depending on RAM, cpu and mobo speeds and win or Linux OS(let's face it don't try to do it with Mac). |
|
